1994-05-03 - RE: The American money capture

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Wayne Q Jones <qjones@infi.net>
Message Hash: 576e8897c2ddbdd11250d1b00bd4961fa2588c6e8669fa7aa78dd88c609b51d2
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9405030806.A8518-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9405022329.A25680-0100000@larry>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-03 16:19:01 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 May 94 09:19:01 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 94 09:19:01 PDT
To: Wayne Q Jones <qjones@infi.net>
Subject: RE: The American money capture
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9405022329.A25680-0100000@larry>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9405030806.A8518-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


C'punks,

On Mon, 2 May 1994, Wayne Q Jones wrote:

> The money supply dwindled 1: by the accumulation of capital in the hands 
> of a few 2: the immediate fiscal policy of the govt which also sucked money
> out of the economy....

Wrong.  Wayne's "1:" explanation is pure Scrooge McDuck thinking.  The
"few" do not "accumulate" capital in the sense Wayne fears (i.e., in
Scrooge McDuck's undergroung vault).  They collect it, spend it, invest
it, deposit it in the bank, whatever;  but it still keeps circulating.  If
anything, such activity expands the money supply. 

I'm not sure I (nor Wayne) know what he actually meant by his #"2:" 
assertion.  Perhaps he will elucidate.


 S a n d y









Thread