1994-05-15 - Re: PGP 2.5 & Remailers

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: David Merriman <merriman@metronet.com>
Message Hash: 74e5ac69661e1d087dfe73b5dddf86cf03de1e161a25c1f7433c8a8639a67856
Message ID: <9405151039.AA02078@bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <199405140202.AA02751@metronet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-15 10:39:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 May 94 03:39:45 PDT

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 15 May 94 03:39:45 PDT
To: David Merriman <merriman@metronet.com>
Subject: Re: PGP 2.5 & Remailers
In-Reply-To: <199405140202.AA02751@metronet.com>
Message-ID: <9405151039.AA02078@bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I was just wondering if there was going to be any hacking done to the anon
> remailers to allow PGP 2.5 usage, as well as PGP 2.3.  If so, how would
> the headers change (if any), other than the obvious version numbers?  Can
> we expect to see anouncements by various remailers advising as to whether
> they'll be supporting v2.5?

No hacking necessary.  Things should be totally compatible, so long
as servers are running at least 2.3a; although 2.5 is recommended. :-)

They are compatible.

-derek




Thread