From: David Merriman <merriman@metronet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (cypherpunks)
Message Hash: f16b80f82f952de58c1f7f1a56d2e5c8a1784846bc48ed5dafeb7b07270cbfd2
Message ID: <199405140202.AA02751@metronet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-14 02:02:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 May 94 19:02:18 PDT
From: David Merriman <merriman@metronet.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 94 19:02:18 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (cypherpunks)
Subject: PGP 2.5 & Remailers
Message-ID: <199405140202.AA02751@metronet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I was just wondering if there was going to be any hacking done to the anon
remailers to allow PGP 2.5 usage, as well as PGP 2.3. If so, how would
the headers change (if any), other than the obvious version numbers? Can
we expect to see anouncements by various remailers advising as to whether
they'll be supporting v2.5?
Dave Merriman
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.3a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=8RGj
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Return to May 1994
Return to “Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>”