From: whitaker@dpair.csd.sgi.com (Russell Whitaker)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8e01f46b52baa69ddf5544422696452cb36c48c826cd82be3861a2664e14b67d
Message ID: <9405170741.ZM2328@dpair.csd.sgi.com>
Reply To: <gate.RsNFmc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-17 14:44:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 May 94 07:44:41 PDT
From: whitaker@dpair.csd.sgi.com (Russell Whitaker)
Date: Tue, 17 May 94 07:44:41 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Penet ID allocated
In-Reply-To: <gate.RsNFmc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <9405170741.ZM2328@dpair.csd.sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On May 16, 3:25pm, rishab@dxm.ernet.in wrote:
> Subject: Penet ID allocated
> daemon@anon.penet.fi Mon May 16 10:39:28 1994
>
> > You have sent a message using the anonymous contact service.
> > You have been allocated the code name an98437.
> > You can be reached anonymously using the address
> > an98437@anon.penet.fi.
>
> Obviously I'm not going to send anon mail through penet! I guess this is
> a response to my post to the list yesterday, so someone must have subscribed
> with their anXXXX address.
>
I got a similar mailing from penet, for no good reason. Anyone else seeing
this? Mail header shows that I was sent the message directly, with a different
anon id than the one Rishab was sent, which suggests to me these IDs are being
generated for individuals ad hoc.
> Rishab Aiyer Ghosh
> rishab@dxm.ernet.in
--
Russell Earl Whitaker whitaker@csd.sgi.com
Silicon Graphics Inc.
Technical Assistance Center / Centre D'Assistance Technique /
Tekunikaru Ashisutansu Sentaa
Mountain View CA (415) 390-2250
================================================================
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Return to May 1994
Return to “whitaker@dpair.csd.sgi.com (Russell Whitaker)”