1994-06-02 - Re: News Flash: Clipper Bug?

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
Message Hash: 093bde3742250047c8201bfafc9193fe9b129a3f0110c00f00af7cd8561439be
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9406020932.A17462-0100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <9406021336.AA01931@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-02 13:39:38 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 06:39:38 PDT

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 06:39:38 PDT
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Subject: Re: News Flash: Clipper Bug?
In-Reply-To: <9406021336.AA01931@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9406020932.A17462-0100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Thu, 2 Jun 1994, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> 
> No, it doesn't require so much compute power as to need such
> activity. I'm still examining Matt's paper -- I'll get him to explain,
> or if he doesn't I'll post a summary.
> 
> Perry
> 

Is the generation of a fake LEAF something that has to be done using the 
"current" communications session or can you store them up in advance of 
need and just slap them into place during each session?

DCF






Thread