From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Message Hash: 1506de3283f4c6a1798f9b1c3a16031a1b95e4ec33004c1abae75b0651681b87
Message ID: <9406021344.AA01960@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.87.9406020932.A17462-0100000@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-02 13:44:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 06:44:25 PDT
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 06:44:25 PDT
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Subject: Re: News Flash: Clipper Bug?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9406020932.A17462-0100000@panix.com>
Message-ID: <9406021344.AA01960@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Duncan Frissell says:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 1994, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> >
> > No, it doesn't require so much compute power as to need such
> > activity. I'm still examining Matt's paper -- I'll get him to explain,
> > or if he doesn't I'll post a summary.
>
> Is the generation of a fake LEAF something that has to be done using the
> "current" communications session or can you store them up in advance of
> need and just slap them into place during each session?
Information *will* be forthcoming. Hang on.
Perry
Return to June 1994
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”