From: Eric_Weaver@avtc.sel.sony.com (Eric Weaver)
To: ravage@bga.com
Message Hash: 4e78e9679e61b0c7a8efabf04b179fdb5c705a5bbde211b151016814fc02f2d2
Message ID: <9406110002.AA03441@sosfc.avtc.sel.sony.com>
Reply To: <199406102134.QAA06628@zoom.bga.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-11 00:02:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 17:02:30 PDT
From: Eric_Weaver@avtc.sel.sony.com (Eric Weaver)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 17:02:30 PDT
To: ravage@bga.com
Subject: back to programming projects...
In-Reply-To: <199406102134.QAA06628@zoom.bga.com>
Message-ID: <9406110002.AA03441@sosfc.avtc.sel.sony.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 1994 16:34:05 -0500 (CDT)
Why should I trust them at all? Why should I willingy become an
occomplice in any of their activities? I don't [want?] anyone,
including me, being able to figure out what is going on. But more
importantly you seem to assume that these pair of communicators are
not trying to determine something about me with their traffice.
So you're trying to prevent the users from finding something out about
you? What, exactly? Trying to understand the issue here.
By encrypting the outgoing the reciever is
shure that it came from my re-mailer and not somebody else.
If you encrypt it with the remailer's private key, yeah. I thought
you were saying earlier that you'd encrypt the outgoing messages with
the recipient's public key. Did I misunderstand?
Return to June 1994
Return to “Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>”