1994-06-11 - Re: back to programming projects…

Header Data

From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8dc6a48d872bd2c6a1e2d96f1f86ec382ba9ef653831ae0acda9447445fcae21
Message ID: <199406110406.AA21883@xtropia>
Reply To: <199406102134.QAA06628@zoom.bga.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-11 04:25:14 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 21:25:14 PDT

Raw message

From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 21:25:14 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: back to programming projects...
In-Reply-To: <199406102134.QAA06628@zoom.bga.com>
Message-ID: <199406110406.AA21883@xtropia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
    Subject: Re: back to programming projects...
    Date: Fri, 10 Jun 1994 16:34:05 -0500 (CDT)
    
    Why should I trust them at all?

I think that this is a very reasonable question.  Clearly, you
shouldn't.  If you let just anyone use it, your trust level is zilcho.

On a related note, should encrypting remailers have the keys changed
regularly?  The RSA-IDEA combination isn't very suspectible to known
plaintext attacks, right?

Zeke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLfkHBRVg/9j67wWxAQEDEQQAsPWAPfzlDTwuARm6cJMAtp056KhP135X
RE4BVW3xAsuS3oXsWYuMWOortRJcdE0XdJCqAYFS+ULu842Cj6s/P+dKS/vmMptH
mrky+KPvWEKCnV0aD5L5nlj1KaiFJCn7ZtXZi5Zxn3+JpNxIIW2oASaHL9hk7Xnd
sqiHNzWgjw4=
=TMio
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread