From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8dc6a48d872bd2c6a1e2d96f1f86ec382ba9ef653831ae0acda9447445fcae21
Message ID: <199406110406.AA21883@xtropia>
Reply To: <199406102134.QAA06628@zoom.bga.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-11 04:25:14 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 21:25:14 PDT
From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 21:25:14 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: back to programming projects...
In-Reply-To: <199406102134.QAA06628@zoom.bga.com>
Message-ID: <199406110406.AA21883@xtropia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
Subject: Re: back to programming projects...
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 1994 16:34:05 -0500 (CDT)
Why should I trust them at all?
I think that this is a very reasonable question. Clearly, you
shouldn't. If you let just anyone use it, your trust level is zilcho.
On a related note, should encrypting remailers have the keys changed
regularly? The RSA-IDEA combination isn't very suspectible to known
plaintext attacks, right?
Zeke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLfkHBRVg/9j67wWxAQEDEQQAsPWAPfzlDTwuARm6cJMAtp056KhP135X
RE4BVW3xAsuS3oXsWYuMWOortRJcdE0XdJCqAYFS+ULu842Cj6s/P+dKS/vmMptH
mrky+KPvWEKCnV0aD5L5nlj1KaiFJCn7ZtXZi5Zxn3+JpNxIIW2oASaHL9hk7Xnd
sqiHNzWgjw4=
=TMio
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to June 1994
Return to “Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>”