From: Hal Abelson <hal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4f40771ee5d805e5a241d39e073c7d2190d2dd22ae4dd365aa5572927590c761
Message ID: <9407210232.AA08923@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-21 02:32:26 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Jul 94 19:32:26 PDT
From: Hal Abelson <hal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 94 19:32:26 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Clipper Chip retreat
Message-ID: <9407210232.AA08923@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From tomorrow's NYT:
type: NYT (Copyright 1994 The New York Times)
priority: Urgent
date: 07-20-94 2114EDT
category: Financial
subject: BC CLIPPER CHIP RETREAT
title: ADMINISTRATION REVERSES ITSLEF ON WIRETAPPING TECHNOLOGY
author: JOHN MARKOFF
text:
In an abrupt and significant reversal, the Clinton
administration indicated Wednesday that it was willing to consider
alternatives to its Clipper chip wiretapping technology, which has
been widely criticized by industry executives and privacy-rights
groups.
...
I'll leave it to someone else to post the entire article, but the gist
is that Gore sent a letter to Maria Cantwell saying that the
administration is willing to consider alternatives to Clipper that are
based upon nonclassified algrithms, and where the escrow agents are
not government agencies. They still insist on an escrow system,
however.
There's a quote from Marc Rotenberg saying that the escorw requirement
is still unacceptable.
Return to July 1994
Return to “solman@MIT.EDU”