solman@MIT.EDU (65 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

How broad are PKP’s patents?

• 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 05:22:17 PDT) - How broad are PKP’s patents? - solman@MIT.EDU

Probabilistic Encryption

• 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 05:22:19 PDT) - Probabilistic Encryption - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 06:44:47 PDT) - Re: Probabilistic Encryption - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 10:58:02 PDT) - Re: Probabilistic Encryption - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?

• 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 05:22:20 PDT) - Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 06:44:20 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1994-07-15 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 23:45:54 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 07:50:05 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
    • 1994-07-15 (Fri, 15 Jul 94 00:27:06 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - solman@MIT.EDU

Key length security (calculations!)

• 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 10:40:18 PDT) - Key length security (calculations!) - doug@OpenMind.com (Doug Cutrell)
  • 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 12:10:14 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1994-07-15 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 22:44:14 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
      • 1994-07-15 (Fri, 15 Jul 94 13:51:13 PDT) - Key length security (calculations!) - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
    • 1994-07-15 (Fri, 15 Jul 94 00:29:01 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-07-17 (Sun, 17 Jul 94 09:38:53 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - rarachel@prism.poly.edu (Arsen Ray Arachelian)
      • 1994-07-17 (Sun, 17 Jul 94 10:19:47 PDT) - Can NSA and PKP Suppress Breakthroughs? - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
      • 1994-07-17 (Sun, 17 Jul 94 11:58:52 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Probabilistic Encryption

• 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 09:21:20 PDT) - Re: Probabilistic Encryption - gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
  • 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 09:31:41 PDT) - Re: Probabilistic Encryption - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1994-07-15 (Fri, 15 Jul 94 00:29:12 PDT) - Re: Probabilistic Encryption - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1994-07-14 (Thu, 14 Jul 94 12:07:09 PDT) - Probabilistic Encryption - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)

Re: Card Playing Protocol?

• 1994-07-16 (Fri, 15 Jul 94 19:28:23 PDT) - Re: Card Playing Protocol? - kentborg@world.std.com (Kent Borg)
  • 1994-07-16 (Fri, 15 Jul 94 20:15:59 PDT) - Re: Card Playing Protocol? - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
  • 1994-07-16 (Sat, 16 Jul 94 10:45:44 PDT) - Card Playing Protocol? - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
    • 1994-07-16 (Sat, 16 Jul 94 11:15:02 PDT) - Re: Card Playing Protocol? - solman@MIT.EDU
      • 1994-07-17 (Sat, 16 Jul 94 23:31:44 PDT) - Re: Card Playing Protocol? - joshua geller <joshua@cae.retix.com>
      • 1994-07-18 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 11:09:22 PDT) - Card Playing Protocol? - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)

Re: Key length security (calculations!)

• 1994-07-17 (Sun, 17 Jul 94 16:58:55 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1994-07-18 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 01:52:54 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-07-18 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 09:30:21 PDT) - Re: Key length security (calculations!) - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Probabilistic encryption works!

• 1994-07-18 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 05:24:34 PDT) - Probabilistic encryption works! - rishab@dxm.ernet.in
  • 1994-07-18 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 11:20:33 PDT) - Re: Probabilistic encryption works! - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?

• 1994-07-18 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 11:03:17 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - John Douceur <johndo@microsoft.com>
  • 1994-07-18 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 13:19:22 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?

• 1994-07-19 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 18:02:10 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - John Douceur <johndo@microsoft.com>
  • 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 05:37:39 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?

• 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 09:50:08 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - John Douceur <johndo@microsoft.com>
  • 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 11:32:40 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?

• 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 16:18:59 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - John Douceur <johndo@microsoft.com>
  • 1994-07-20 (Wed, 20 Jul 94 15:54:23 PDT) - Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt? - solman@MIT.EDU

Clipper Chip retreat

• 1994-07-21 (Wed, 20 Jul 94 19:32:26 PDT) - Clipper Chip retreat - Hal Abelson <hal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
  • 1994-07-21 (Wed, 20 Jul 94 20:58:35 PDT) - Re: Clipper Chip retreat - Ian Farquhar <ifarqhar@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
  • 1994-07-21 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 08:15:13 PDT) - No more Cantwell amendment? was Re: Clipper Chip retreat - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Voice/Fax Checks

• 1994-07-21 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 04:20:14 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
  • 1994-07-21 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 08:38:36 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-07-22 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 23:58:30 PDT) - Agorics, Digital Cash, and Protocol Ecologies - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
  • 1994-07-22 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 20:33:00 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)

Re: Voice/Fax Checks

• 1994-07-21 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 09:43:36 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
  • 1994-07-21 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 09:53:13 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 10:27:22 PDT) - Small transaction amounts - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)

Re: No more Cantwell amendment? was Re: Clipper Chip retreat

• Unknown thread root
  • 1994-07-21 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 13:46:58 PDT) - Re: No more Cantwell amendment? was Re: Clipper Chip retreat - solman@MIT.EDU

“Key Escrow” — the very idea

• 1994-07-21 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 16:49:59 PDT) - “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
  • 1994-07-22 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 18:00:33 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 07:50:28 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
  • 1994-07-22 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 18:56:26 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
    • 1994-07-22 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 21:35:56 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
  • 1994-07-22 (Thu, 21 Jul 94 19:37:26 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 08:29:06 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
      • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 08:38:08 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - solman@MIT.EDU
        • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 15:21:08 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - ebrandt@muddcs.cs.hmc.edu (Eli Brandt)
      • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 09:33:09 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 08:52:37 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
      • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 09:43:15 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 05:39:01 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
  • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 06:04:19 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 06:27:17 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - adwestro@ouray.Denver.Colorado.EDU (Alan Westrope)
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 06:52:53 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 13:16:03 PDT) - Stalling the crypto legislation for 2-3 more years - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
        • 1994-07-24 (Sun, 24 Jul 94 07:43:33 PDT) - Re: Stalling the crypto legislation for 2-3 more years - Dave Banisar <tc@phantom.com>
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 09:28:09 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
      • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 11:17:39 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
        • 1994-07-23 (Sat, 23 Jul 94 16:04:29 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
    • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 09:46:56 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Ben Goren <ben@Tux.Music.ASU.Edu>
    • 1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 22:17:14 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Peter Murphy <pkm@maths.uq.oz.au>
    • 1994-07-27 (Wed, 27 Jul 94 09:22:42 PDT) - Re: “Key Escrow” — the very idea - Aron Freed <s009amf@discover.wright.edu>

Re: Voice/Fax Checks

• 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 08:52:46 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - hfinney@shell.portal.com
  • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 10:09:44 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 20:47:07 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
      • 1994-07-23 (Sat, 23 Jul 94 09:47:51 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Voice/Fax Checks

• 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 12:13:21 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 13:04:47 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 20:06:00 PDT) - Voice/Fax Checks - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)

Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal

• 1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 16:49:15 PDT) - Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - mpjohnso@nyx10.cs.du.edu (Michael Johnson)
  • 1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 18:02:52 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 20:02:07 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - Bill & <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
    • 1994-07-26 (Mon, 25 Jul 94 19:47:50 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
      • 1994-07-26 (Mon, 25 Jul 94 23:52:30 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
        • 1994-07-26 (Tue, 26 Jul 94 10:44:02 PDT) - more forward secrecy - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
      • 1994-07-27 (Wed, 27 Jul 94 07:51:48 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - Michael Paul Johnson <mpj@netcom.com>
  • 1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 21:12:30 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
    • 1994-07-26 (Mon, 25 Jul 94 20:07:04 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
  • 1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 21:37:07 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>

Re: Voice/Fax Checks

• 1994-07-23 (Sat, 23 Jul 94 15:15:37 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1994-07-24 (Sat, 23 Jul 94 17:34:06 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - solman@MIT.EDU

Pantent archive?

• 1994-07-24 (Sun, 24 Jul 94 08:40:41 PDT) - Pantent archive? - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Voice/Fax Checks

• 1994-07-24 (Sun, 24 Jul 94 09:47:33 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1994-07-24 (Sun, 24 Jul 94 10:09:59 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: “Just say ‘No’ to key escrow.”

• 1994-07-30 (Fri, 29 Jul 94 18:14:33 PDT) - Re: “Just say ‘No’ to key escrow.” - Graham Toal <gtoal@an-teallach.com>
  • 1994-07-30 (Fri, 29 Jul 94 19:33:03 PDT) - Re: “Just say ‘No’ to key escrow.” - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-08-01 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 08:11:24 PDT) - Re: “Just say ‘No’ to key escrow.” - Dave Otto <dave@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
      • 1994-08-01 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 12:35:56 PDT) - Re: “Just say ‘No’ to key escrow.” - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack

• 1994-08-01 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 09:10:21 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk (Jim Dixon)
  • 1994-08-01 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 11:00:53 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
  • 1994-08-01 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 12:52:03 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-08-01 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 15:09:42 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - Lyman Hazelton <lrh@crl.com>
  • 1994-08-01 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 14:50:02 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - Lyman Hazelton <lrh@crl.com>
  • 1994-08-02 (Mon, 1 Aug 94 19:55:11 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - rarachel@prism.poly.edu (Arsen Ray Arachelian)
    • 1994-08-02 (Tue, 2 Aug 94 05:28:27 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1994-08-02 (Tue, 2 Aug 94 05:50:40 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - Rolf Michelsen <Rolf.Michelsen@delab.sintef.no>
        • 1994-08-02 (Tue, 2 Aug 94 08:12:18 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
          • 1994-08-02 (Tue, 2 Aug 94 09:19:17 PDT) - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack - Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>

Truth, Justice, and the Waco Way

• 1994-08-02 (Tue, 2 Aug 94 12:42:47 PDT) - Truth, Justice, and the Waco Way - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
  • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 03:40:55 PDT) - Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
    • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 08:46:16 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
      • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 10:30:50 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
        • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 13:56:00 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
          • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 14:49:20 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
            • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 16:05:26 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
              • 1994-08-04 (Thu, 4 Aug 94 05:01:41 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
            • 1994-08-04 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 18:59:51 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - solman@MIT.EDU
              • 1994-08-04 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 19:44:51 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
          • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 16:22:07 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
        • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 15:32:20 PDT) - Re: Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
      • 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 13:39:01 PDT) - Egalitarianism vs. Strong Cryptography - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)

anonymous anonymous remailers?

• 1994-08-03 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 16:25:23 PDT) - anonymous anonymous remailers? - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
  • 1994-08-04 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 19:07:27 PDT) - Re: anonymous anonymous remailers? - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: anonymous anonymous remailers?

• 1994-08-04 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 20:15:54 PDT) - Re: anonymous anonymous remailers? - Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
  • 1994-08-04 (Wed, 3 Aug 94 20:32:26 PDT) - Re: anonymous anonymous remailers? - solman@MIT.EDU

Voluntary Governments?

• 1994-08-04 (Thu, 4 Aug 94 02:09:41 PDT) - Voluntary Governments? - tcmay@localhost.netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
  • 1994-08-04 (Thu, 4 Aug 94 06:30:37 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-08-04 (Thu, 4 Aug 94 07:18:07 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
    • 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 21:00:48 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: Voluntary Governments?

• Unknown thread root
  • 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 20:23:43 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
    • 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 20:23:55 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? - solman@mit.edu

Re: Voluntary Governments?

• 1994-08-04 (Thu, 4 Aug 94 08:16:09 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? - dance@cicero.spc.uchicago.edu (Squeal)
  • 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 21:02:58 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? - solman@MIT.EDU

No Subject

• 1994-08-08 (Sun, 7 Aug 94 23:06:14 PDT) - No Subject - <an118@vox.hacktic.nl> (Nobody)
  • 1994-08-08 (Mon, 8 Aug 94 05:00:38 PDT) - amateur ciphers - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1994-08-08 (Mon, 8 Aug 94 15:09:24 PDT) - Re: amateur ciphers - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-08-09 (Mon, 8 Aug 94 22:42:59 PDT) - Re: amateur ciphers - Justin Lister <ruf@osiris.cs.uow.edu.au>
      • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 05:56:05 PDT) - Re: amateur ciphers - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

Re: e$

• Unknown thread root
  • 1994-08-10 (Wed, 10 Aug 94 07:29:00 PDT) - Re: e$ - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1994-08-10 (Wed, 10 Aug 94 14:26:41 PDT) - Re: e$ - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
      • 1994-08-11 (Thu, 11 Aug 94 16:29:39 PDT) - Re: e$ & Reporting Cash Trans - binski@u.washington.edu
        • 1994-08-12 (Thu, 11 Aug 94 20:35:37 PDT) - Re: e$ & Reporting Cash Trans - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
          • 1994-08-12 (Fri, 12 Aug 94 09:29:37 PDT) - Re: e$ & Reporting Cash Trans - solman@MIT.EDU

ccc [alt.suicide.holiday #18856]

• 1994-08-20 (Fri, 19 Aug 94 23:33:56 PDT) - ccc [alt.suicide.holiday #18856] - solman@MIT.EDU

Force is not physical

• 1994-08-31 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 01:29:18 PDT) - Force is not physical - rishab@dxm.ernet.in
  • 1994-08-31 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 14:17:35 PDT) - Re: Force is not physical - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1994-08-31 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 16:28:11 PDT) - Re: Force is not physical - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-08-31 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 16:34:26 PDT) - Re: Force is not physical - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1994-09-01 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 17:38:49 PDT) - Re: Force is not physical - jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
    • 1994-09-01 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 20:37:31 PDT) - Force is not physical - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)

Re: Problems with anonymous escrow 2–response

• 1994-08-31 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 14:43:21 PDT) - Re: Problems with anonymous escrow 2–response - Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
  • 1994-09-01 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 17:08:09 PDT) - Re: Problems with anonymous escrow 2–response - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-09-01 (Wed, 31 Aug 94 18:38:05 PDT) - Re: Problems with anonymous escrow 2–response - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Is the following digicash protocol possible?

• 1994-09-01 (Thu, 1 Sep 94 14:15:13 PDT) - Is the following digicash protocol possible? - jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
  • 1994-09-01 (Thu, 1 Sep 94 16:29:46 PDT) - Re: Is the following digicash protocol possible? - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1994-09-02 (Thu, 1 Sep 94 20:08:53 PDT) - Re: Is the following digicash protocol possible? - solman@MIT.EDU

Cabel TV’s new specs require leaky encryption

• 1994-09-02 (Thu, 1 Sep 94 23:21:36 PDT) - Cabel TV’s new specs require leaky encryption - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
  • 1994-09-02 (Fri, 2 Sep 94 00:59:25 PDT) - More signs that key escrow is coming - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
  • 1994-09-02 (Fri, 2 Sep 94 06:38:45 PDT) - Re: Cabel TV’s new specs require leaky encryption - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread?

• 1994-09-29 (Thu, 29 Sep 94 05:41:13 PDT) - Re: Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread? - frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
  • 1994-09-29 (Thu, 29 Sep 94 06:57:26 PDT) - Re: Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread? - “Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>
    • 1994-09-29 (Thu, 29 Sep 94 10:58:16 PDT) - Will all codes and ciphers be broken? - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
  • 1994-10-03 (Mon, 3 Oct 94 01:17:09 PDT) - Re: Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread? - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-10-03 (Mon, 3 Oct 94 13:27:46 PDT) - Re: Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread? - “David A. Wagner” <dawagner@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
      • 1994-10-04 (Mon, 3 Oct 94 21:01:48 PDT) - Re: Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread? - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-10-03 (Mon, 3 Oct 94 14:23:47 PDT) - Re: Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread? - jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)

archives

• 1994-10-02 (Sun, 2 Oct 94 15:55:05 PDT) - archives - iqg1550@acf4.NYU.EDU (iqg1550)
  • 1994-10-04 (Tue, 4 Oct 94 12:35:55 PDT) - Re: archives - cactus@bb.com (L. Todd Masco)
    • 1994-10-05 (Tue, 4 Oct 94 22:18:08 PDT) - Re: archives - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1994-10-05 (Tue, 4 Oct 94 22:41:57 PDT) - Re: archives - “L. Todd Masco” <cactus@bb.com>
      • 1994-10-05 (Wed, 5 Oct 94 00:35:31 PDT) - Re: archives - solman@MIT.EDU

URGENT - MS hack of FFS

• 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 10:56:40 PST) - URGENT - MS hack of FFS - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel (NewsClip)

• 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 06:36:32 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel (NewsClip) - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 08:03:54 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel (NewsClip) - solman@MIT.EDU

Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel

• 1995-07-28 (Thu, 27 Jul 95 23:23:31 PDT) - Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 00:32:58 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
    • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 07:12:00 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 08:25:43 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - solman@MIT.EDU
        • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 08:30:53 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 09:16:00 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - solman@MIT.EDU
            • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 09:33:40 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 09:24:38 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
        • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 09:37:06 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 10:03:03 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
        • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 10:17:48 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
          • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 10:25:56 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 10:54:29 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
            • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 12:41:57 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
      • 1995-07-28 (Fri, 28 Jul 95 13:07:53 PDT) - Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Phil Fraering <pgf@tyrell.net>
        • 1995-07-30 (Sun, 30 Jul 95 15:05:37 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@panix.com>

Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel

• 1995-08-04 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 20:43:05 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
  • 1995-08-04 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 22:17:39 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
    • 1995-08-05 (Sat, 5 Aug 95 00:51:58 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - solman@MIT.EDU

RSA has been proved correct

• 1995-08-04 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 23:40:51 PDT) - RSA has been proved correct - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-08-05 (Sat, 5 Aug 95 01:06:54 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 18:51:07 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
      • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 20:29:50 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
        • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 22:50:13 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 10:41:53 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)

“S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)

• 1995-08-09 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 16:00:53 PDT) - “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1995-08-09 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 16:51:42 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
    • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:05:40 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - solman@MIT.EDU
      • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:08:53 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
    • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 23:19:09 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
      • 1995-08-10 (Thu, 10 Aug 95 01:45:34 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 17:59:48 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - “Josh M. Osborne” <stripes@va.pubnix.com>

Legality of suverting computational cycles via Microsoft

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-08-21 (Sun, 20 Aug 95 17:26:47 PDT) - Legality of suverting computational cycles via Microsoft - solman@MIT.EDU

Re: DES & RC4-48 Challenges

• 1995-08-22 (Mon, 21 Aug 95 21:12:15 PDT) - Re: DES & RC4-48 Challenges - dan@milliways.org (Dan Bailey)
  • 1995-08-22 (Mon, 21 Aug 95 21:43:33 PDT) - Re: DES & RC4-48 Challenges - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1995-08-22 (Mon, 21 Aug 95 22:30:28 PDT) - Re: DES & RC4-48 Challenges - hallam@w3.org

question about reputation

• 1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 15:32:12 PDT) - question about reputation - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
  • 1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 15:57:18 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 16:10:30 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
    • 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 17:20:39 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
      • 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 19:07:44 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 18:55:45 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary

• 1995-12-02 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 03:48:06 +0800) - Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1995-12-02 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 03:52:21 +0800) - Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1995-12-03 (Sun, 3 Dec 95 06:10:26 PST) - Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>

Secure versus ?

• 1995-12-05 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 08:51:33 PST) - Secure versus ? - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1995-12-06 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 16:03:36 PST) - Re: Secure versus ? - Robbie Gates <gates_r@maths.su.oz.au>

Executing Encrypted Code

• 1996-12-19 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:08:25 -0800 (PST)) - Executing Encrypted Code - ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
  • 1996-12-20 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 18:14:54 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Executing Encrypted Code - Ben Byer <root@bushing.plastic.crosslink.net>
  • 1996-12-20 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 21:48:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Executing Encrypted Code - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
  • 1996-12-22 (Sat, 21 Dec 1996 16:34:07 -0800 (PST)) - Running code on a machine you don’t trust (was Re: Executing Encrypted Code) - Nelson Minar <nelson@media.mit.edu>
    • 1996-12-22 (Sat, 21 Dec 1996 21:44:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Running code on a machine you don’t trust (was Re: Executing Encrypted Code) - solman@MIT.EDU

New crypto regulations

• 1996-12-30 (Sun, 29 Dec 1996 17:06:55 -0800 (PST)) - New crypto regulations - gt@kdn0.attnet.or.jp (Gemini Thunder)
  • 1996-12-30 (Sun, 29 Dec 1996 18:38:06 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1996-12-30 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 04:25:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
      • 1996-12-30 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 15:33:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1996-12-30 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 10:24:42 -0800 (PST)) - OCR and Machine Readable Text - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1996-12-31 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 20:17:28 -0800 (PST)) - Re: OCR and Machine Readable Text - Omegaman <omega@bigeasy.com>
  • 1996-12-30 (Sun, 29 Dec 1996 19:38:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - “David Lesher / hated by RBOC’s in 5 states” <wb8foz@wauug.erols.com>
  • 1996-12-30 (Sun, 29 Dec 1996 21:02:57 -0800 (PST)) - Export proposal - nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
    • 1996-12-30 (Sun, 29 Dec 1996 22:03:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Export proposal - sameer <sameer@c2.net>
  • 1996-12-30 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 00:00:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Export proposal - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1996-12-30 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 07:20:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
  • 1996-12-30 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 08:57:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Export proposal - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
  • 1996-12-31 (Tue, 31 Dec 1996 02:44:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - gt@kdn0.attnet.or.jp (Gemini Thunder)
  • 1996-12-31 (Tue, 31 Dec 1996 09:46:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
  • 1997-01-02 (Thu, 2 Jan 1997 13:42:28 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New crypto regulations - daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)