1994-07-23 - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal

Header Data

From: Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
To: N/A
Message Hash: dc49381d7c562f55a7e5c6255e031e1a0bafb89f85168d2218540ad485956774
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9407222201.A14911-0100000@xmission>
Reply To: <9407222348.AA18125@nyx10.cs.du.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-23 04:37:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 21:37:07 PDT

Raw message

From: Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 21:37:07 PDT
Subject: Re: Gore's "new and improved" key escrow proposal
In-Reply-To: <9407222348.AA18125@nyx10.cs.du.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9407222201.A14911-0100000@xmission>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Fri, 22 Jul 1994, Michael Johnson wrote:
> all the offices in one wing of a building, or something like that.  That could
> be good in some business uses, provided you could pick your own trusted master
> key holder.  I don't think that is what Al Gore has in mind.
So lets deliver this before he can deliver his.

What we need to do is use the concepts of fair key escrow.  This can be 
done using the pgp as a framework, just as you said.


Berzerk





Thread