1994-07-26 - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal

Header Data

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
To: solman@MIT.EDU
Message Hash: f2bed02104440233e7f82f82f2d5420cf973da567c3ad81922e6655d419356f2
Message ID: <199407251802.LAA10432@servo.qualcomm.com>
Reply To: <9407230102.AA17231@ua.MIT.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-26 02:47:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Jul 94 19:47:50 PDT

Raw message

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 94 19:47:50 PDT
To: solman@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Gore's "new and improved" key escrow proposal
In-Reply-To: <9407230102.AA17231@ua.MIT.EDU>
Message-ID: <199407251802.LAA10432@servo.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I think we need to distinguish between encrypted *storage* and
encrypted *communications*.  Voluntary key escrow may make sense for
encrypted stored business files, but communications is a different
story. Since there should be nobody out there recording packets, there
is no need to back up or escrow the keys used to encrypt them.

Phil







Thread