From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
To: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Message Hash: 1c0943e7258867b7fa1bd53ba11dad3fec1110e5f7e99b4b52fdedb92807563d
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950810012027.18054B-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
Reply To: <199508100000.UAA07792@crypto.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-10 06:19:09 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 23:19:09 PDT
From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 23:19:09 PDT
To: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Subject: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
In-Reply-To: <199508100000.UAA07792@crypto.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950810012027.18054B-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Matt Blaze wrote:
> I don't know what to believe. If this is a real, classified cryptosystem,
> it would be a very unusual first. On the other hand, if this is a hoax,
> whoever did it appears to have gone to some trouble, and has included some
> interesting design features. A third possibility, if we are to believe
> the spook markings, is that it is a re-implementation of someone else's
> cryptosystem, created for the purpose of cryptanlysis.
Two other possibilities: (1) It's merely an independently produced
cryptosystem disguised as a "leak" to save its creator the trouble of
asking experts to analyze it for him/her. (2) It's a misleading /
intentionally "wrong" version of something, "leaked" by a government
official of whatever ilk to precipitate a legal investigation of
Cypherpunks, remailers, etc. (ie to show a judge to get wiretaps, etc.)
I'm skeptical of (2), but it occured to me, and one can't be too safe...
Jon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu> (410) 494-3253
Visit my home page at http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/
You have a friend at the NSA: Big Brother is watching. Finger for PGP key.
Return to August 1995
Return to “solman@MIT.EDU”