futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex) (187 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Mail2news Gates

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-07-30 (Sat, 29 Jul 95 18:33:03 PDT) - Re: Mail2news Gates - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: your mail

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-07-31 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 05:38:45 PDT) - Re: your mail - Andy Brown <asb@nexor.co.uk>
    • 1995-07-31 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 07:43:38 PDT) - Re: your mail - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
      • 1995-07-31 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 12:26:05 PDT) - Re: your mail - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
        • 1995-07-31 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 13:50:00 PDT) - Re: your mail - Syed Yusuf <yusuf921@uidaho.edu>
        • 1995-07-31 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 15:59:19 PDT) - a hole in PGP - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
          • 1995-07-31 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 16:40:47 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
            • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 17:56:16 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
              • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 01:21:38 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu (L. McCarthy)
                • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 05:19:42 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
                  • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 19:01:10 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
            • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 08:31:10 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - “Patrick J. LoPresti” <patl@skyclad.lcs.mit.edu>
              • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 08:42:52 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@panix.com>
                • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 09:34:31 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - “Patrick J. LoPresti” <patl@skyclad.lcs.mit.edu>
              • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 09:15:27 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
                • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 09:55:43 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - “Patrick J. LoPresti” <patl@skyclad.lcs.mit.edu>
            • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 08:29:20 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Ray Arachelian <sunder@escape.com>

Provably Correct Crypto?

• 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 11:23:03 PDT) - Provably Correct Crypto? - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 12:19:05 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 14:53:28 PDT) - Provably Correct Crypto? - Phil Fraering <pgf@tyrell.net>
      • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 19:13:40 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 15:59:57 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Matthew James Sheppard <Matthew.Sheppard@Comp.VUW.AC.NZ>
      • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 16:24:08 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 22:44:30 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
      • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 01:36:55 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
  • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 12:25:27 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
  • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 00:59:27 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>

Re: Provably Correct Crypto

• 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 07:43:08 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

anonymity review in law journal

• 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 20:36:37 PDT) - anonymity review in law journal - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
  • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 08:31:14 PDT) - Re: anonymity review in law journal - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

NYET–attempted formal specs (again)

• 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 06:53:05 PDT) - NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 11:53:49 PDT) - NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - pjm@ionia.engr.sgi.com (Patrick May)
    • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 16:43:14 PDT) - Re: NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 02:06:05 PDT) - Re: NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 11:33:59 PDT) - Re: NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

“Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown

• 1995-07-20 (Thu, 20 Jul 95 13:28:09 PDT) - “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-07-20 (Thu, 20 Jul 95 14:37:03 PDT) - Re: “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown - “Patrick J. LoPresti” <patl@catfish.lcs.mit.edu>
  • 1995-07-20 (Thu, 20 Jul 95 16:11:21 PDT) - Re: “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu (L. McCarthy)
  • 1995-07-21 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 03:00:40 PDT) - Re: “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-07-21 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 09:51:46 PDT) - Re: “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown - “Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin]” <erc@khijol.intele.net>
    • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 05:43:42 PDT) - Transport Layer Security (Was: Re: “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 08:10:59 PDT) - Re: Transport Layer Security (Was: Re: “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown) - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
      • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 08:17:06 PDT) - Re: Transport Layer Security (Was: Re: “Cypherpunks Write Code” as a Putdown) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@panix.com>

Re: There’s a hole in your crypto…

• 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 05:52:06 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - ab411@detroit.freenet.org (David R. Conrad)
  • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 06:39:52 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 10:10:16 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Loofbourrow <loofbour@cis.ohio-state.edu>
    • 1995-08-05 (Fri, 4 Aug 95 21:03:25 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
      • 1995-08-05 (Sat, 5 Aug 95 05:24:27 PDT) - There’s a hole in your reasonoing - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
      • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 02:18:29 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 05:54:43 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
        • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 22:12:59 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

www remailer interface

• 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 12:35:52 PDT) - www remailer interface - nobody@valhalla.phoenix.net (Anonymous)
  • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 13:31:16 PDT) - Re: www remailer interface - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

“S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)

• 1995-08-09 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 16:00:53 PDT) - “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1995-08-09 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 16:51:42 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
    • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:05:40 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - solman@MIT.EDU
      • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:08:53 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
    • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 23:19:09 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
      • 1995-08-10 (Thu, 10 Aug 95 01:45:34 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 17:59:48 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - “Josh M. Osborne” <stripes@va.pubnix.com>

If only Vxxxx Fxxxxx had used encryption….

• 1995-08-11 (Thu, 10 Aug 95 20:38:33 PDT) - If only Vxxxx Fxxxxx had used encryption…. - monty.harder@famend.com (MONTY HARDER)
  • 1995-08-11 (Thu, 10 Aug 95 23:18:41 PDT) - Key escrow granularity (Was: If only Vxxxx Fxxxxx had used encryption) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Australia, EU crypto ill news, crypto wars

• 1995-08-11 (Fri, 11 Aug 95 01:45:05 PDT) - Australia, EU crypto ill news, crypto wars - aba@dcs.exeter.ac.uk
  • 1995-08-11 (Fri, 11 Aug 95 02:38:42 PDT) - Re: Australia, EU crypto ill news, crypto wars - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-08-11 (Fri, 11 Aug 95 03:56:17 PDT) - Re: Australia, EU crypto ill news, crypto wars - Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>

Re: “Protect the children” as passphrase to Constitution

• 1995-08-11 (Fri, 11 Aug 95 01:16:57 PDT) - Re: “Protect the children” as passphrase to Constitution - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1995-08-11 (Fri, 11 Aug 95 03:07:13 PDT) - Re: “Protect the children” as passphrase to Constitution - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Nym server development….

• 1995-08-12 (Sat, 12 Aug 95 04:58:38 PDT) - Re: Nym server development…. - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

CoS Raid on “Copyright Terrorist”

• 1995-08-14 (Mon, 14 Aug 95 06:28:43 PDT) - CoS Raid on “Copyright Terrorist” - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Data Secrecy Rift

• 1995-08-14 (Mon, 14 Aug 95 06:29:58 PDT) - Data Secrecy Rift - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1995-08-14 (Mon, 14 Aug 95 06:47:09 PDT) - Re: Data Secrecy Rift - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

FBI Files on Clipper Releas

• 1995-08-16 (Wed, 16 Aug 95 12:59:15 PDT) - FBI Files on Clipper Releas - “Dave Banisar” <banisar@epic.org>
  • 1995-08-17 (Wed, 16 Aug 95 17:22:17 PDT) - Re: FBI Files on Clipper Release - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-08-17 (Thu, 17 Aug 95 00:53:42 PDT) - Re: FBI Files on Clipper Release - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
      • 1995-08-23 (Wed, 23 Aug 95 13:14:45 PDT) - Re: FBI Files on Clipper Release - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-08-25 (Fri, 25 Aug 95 02:08:56 PDT) - Re: FBI Files on Clipper Release - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Joel’s RSA-t’s

• 1995-08-29 (Tue, 29 Aug 95 10:20:21 PDT) - Joel’s RSA-t’s - WOOD@VAX2.ROCKHURST.EDU
  • 1995-08-29 (Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:33:19 PDT) - Joel’s RSA-t’s - A.Back@exeter.ac.uk
  • 1995-08-29 (Tue, 29 Aug 95 12:50:15 PDT) - Re: Joel’s RSA-t’s - Michael H. Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com>
    • 1995-09-04 (Sun, 3 Sep 95 17:35:43 PDT) - Re: Joel’s RSA-t’s - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-09-04 (Sun, 3 Sep 95 21:43:14 PDT) - Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: pseudonyms & list health

• 1995-09-04 (Sun, 3 Sep 95 21:52:26 PDT) - Re: pseudonyms & list health - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1995-09-04 (Sun, 3 Sep 95 22:06:16 PDT) - Re: pseudonyms & list health - Deranged Mutant <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
    • 1995-09-04 (Sun, 3 Sep 95 23:14:09 PDT) - Re: pseudonyms & list health - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-09-05 (Mon, 4 Sep 95 22:12:29 PDT) - article/author ratings/reputations (was Re: pseudonyms & list health) - Bryce Wilcox <wilcoxb@nag.cs.colorado.edu>
  • 1995-09-04 (Mon, 4 Sep 95 14:08:41 PDT) - Re: pseudonyms & list health - lwp@mail.msen.com (Lou Poppler)

Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)

• 1995-09-06 (Tue, 5 Sep 95 18:55:45 PDT) - Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment) - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
  • 1995-09-06 (Tue, 5 Sep 95 21:13:12 PDT) - Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

not a flame please read and think about this

• 1995-09-07 (Wed, 6 Sep 95 23:54:39 PDT) - not a flame please read and think about this - an116512@anon.penet.fi
  • 1995-09-07 (Thu, 7 Sep 95 03:27:43 PDT) - Re: not a flame please read and think about this - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-09-07 (Thu, 7 Sep 95 07:06:42 PDT) - Re: not a flame please read and think about this - Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
  • 1995-09-07 (Thu, 7 Sep 95 08:09:54 PDT) - Re: not a flame please read and think about this - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
    • 1995-09-07 (Thu, 7 Sep 95 09:34:06 PDT) - Re: not a flame please read and think about this - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Senate Bill 974?

• 1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 16:47:01 PDT) - Senate Bill 974? - David Neal <dneal@usis.com>
  • 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 17:58:13 PDT) - Re: Senate Bill 974? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

question about reputation

• 1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 15:32:12 PDT) - question about reputation - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
  • 1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 15:57:18 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - solman@MIT.EDU
  • 1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 16:10:30 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
    • 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 17:20:39 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
      • 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 19:07:44 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 18:55:45 PDT) - Re: question about reputation - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?

• 1995-09-12 (Tue, 12 Sep 95 13:51:22 PDT) - Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1995-09-13 (Tue, 12 Sep 95 23:11:19 PDT) - Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Whitehouse “dissident

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-09-13 (Wed, 13 Sep 95 04:58:40 PDT) - Whitehouse “dissident - damion.furi@the-matrix.com (DAMION FURI)
    • 1995-09-13 (Wed, 13 Sep 95 06:30:47 PDT) - (NOISE) Re: White House MONITORS Web Pages ! - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Corporate Use of Anon WWW Proxies

• 1995-09-13 (Wed, 13 Sep 95 12:53:13 PDT) - Corporate Use of Anon WWW Proxies - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Minor Risk to LSB Steganography

• 1995-09-13 (Wed, 13 Sep 95 13:08:02 PDT) - Minor Risk to LSB Steganography - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: An opportunity not to be missed

• 1995-09-14 (Thu, 14 Sep 95 07:51:56 PDT) - Re: An opportunity not to be missed - “Rev. Mark Grant” <mark@unicorn.com>
  • 1995-09-14 (Thu, 14 Sep 95 12:18:11 PDT) - Re: An opportunity not to be missed - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    • 1995-09-14 (Thu, 14 Sep 95 14:01:27 PDT) - Re: Crimestoppers anon tip mailbox - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

RE: Mixmaster status

• 1995-09-15 (Fri, 15 Sep 95 01:06:28 PDT) - RE: Mixmaster status - loki@obscura.com (Lance Cottrell)
  • 1995-09-15 (Fri, 15 Sep 95 05:59:09 PDT) - RE: Mixmaster status - nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
  • 1995-09-15 (Fri, 15 Sep 95 12:48:28 PDT) - Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-09-16 (Fri, 15 Sep 95 18:41:07 PDT) - Re: Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status) - nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)

“Attachments”

• 1995-09-17 (Sun, 17 Sep 95 14:40:32 PDT) - “Attachments” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-09-17 (Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:40:13 PDT) - Re: “Attachments” - shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)
  • 1995-09-17 (Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:46:06 PDT) - Re: “Attachments” - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net

• 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 07:40:46 PDT) - USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)

• 1995-09-19 (Tue, 19 Sep 95 12:29:35 PDT) - Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd) - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu (L. McCarthy)
  • 1995-09-20 (Tue, 19 Sep 95 20:34:28 PDT) - Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd) - iagoldbe@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ian Goldberg)
    • 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 10:21:40 PDT) - Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)

• 1995-09-22 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 23:12:30 PDT) - Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
  • 1995-09-22 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 23:52:42 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 00:15:47 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
      • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 01:14:47 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 01:30:13 PDT) - YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
          • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 01:37:09 PDT) - Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
          • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 01:50:22 PDT) - Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
            • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 02:46:54 PDT) - Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! - heesen@zpr.uni-koeln.de (Rainer Heesen)
          • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 02:29:06 PDT) - Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
            • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 02:36:12 PDT) - Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
          • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 05:48:01 PDT) - Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 05:58:03 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
      • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 05:36:15 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 07:39:36 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
        • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 10:14:04 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
          • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 11:28:44 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
        • 1995-09-25 (Mon, 25 Sep 95 13:47:57 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
          • 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 05:02:10 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 00:34:29 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 03:15:46 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 05:25:00 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)

• 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 00:24:28 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - goedel@tezcat.com (Dietrich J. Kappe)
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 00:53:01 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 01:01:26 PDT) - Mosaic Bug (same as Netscape bug) (was Re: Another Netscape Bug) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 02:22:41 PDT) - Re: Mosaic Bug (same as Netscape bug) (was Re: Another Netscape Bug) - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 05:43:45 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 07:13:45 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Scott M Fabbri <m1smf99@FRB.GOV>
      • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 12:27:31 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
        • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 12:47:17 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - dmandl@panix.com
          • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 13:19:43 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
          • 1995-09-23 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 17:53:21 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
            • 1995-09-23 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 22:16:31 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
          • 1995-09-25 (Mon, 25 Sep 95 12:02:32 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 13:04:54 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - frenchie@magus.dgsys.com (SysAdmin)
      • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 14:08:40 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 10:04:56 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Yih-Chun Hu <yihchun@u.washington.edu>
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 10:18:08 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>

Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft

• 1995-09-22 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 18:53:54 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft - David Van Wie <dvw@hamachi.epr.com>
  • 1995-09-22 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 22:19:47 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 01:27:11 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

The Next Hack

• 1995-09-21 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 11:37:06 PDT) - The Next Hack - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 02:01:29 PDT) - Re: The Next Hack - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-09-23 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 23:01:03 PDT) - Re: The Next Hack - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
    • 1995-09-23 (Sat, 23 Sep 95 04:47:45 PDT) - Re: The Next Hack - “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@warwick.com>
    • 1995-09-23 (Sat, 23 Sep 95 12:24:16 PDT) - Re: The Next Hack - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    • 1995-09-23 (Sat, 23 Sep 95 12:35:32 PDT) - Why I haven’t begun to be nasty to Netscape (was Re: The Next Hack) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-09-23 (Sat, 23 Sep 95 13:57:18 PDT) - Re: The Next Hack - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)

Project: a standard cell random number generator

• 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 14:50:21 PDT) - Project: a standard cell random number generator - John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
  • 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 15:27:51 PDT) - Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-09-21 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 20:49:14 PDT) - /dev/random for Linux - Jeff Simmons <jsimmons@goblin.punk.net>
      • 1995-09-21 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 20:49:58 PDT) - Re: /dev/random for Linux - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 13:40:17 PDT) - Re: /dev/random for Linux - Theodore Ts’o <tytso@MIT.EDU>
  • 1995-09-21 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 20:38:49 PDT) - Random Number State - Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>
  • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 03:38:00 PDT) - Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 04:10:47 PDT) - Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator - Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
      • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 05:57:45 PDT) - Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

“random” number seeds vs. Netscape

• 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 13:15:25 PDT) - “random” number seeds vs. Netscape - karlton@netscape.com (Phil Karlton)
  • 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 14:02:02 PDT) - Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 15:28:22 PDT) - Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape - Phil Karlton <karlton@netscape.com>
      • 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 15:41:55 PDT) - Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 03:43:58 PDT) - RNG Resource FAQ (was Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-09-20 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 14:26:10 PDT) - Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-09-21 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 16:02:11 PDT) - Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape - Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>

Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft

• 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 13:19:55 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft - David Van Wie <dvw@hamachi.epr.com>
  • 1995-09-25 (Sun, 24 Sep 95 20:57:27 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-09-25 (Mon, 25 Sep 95 10:04:05 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Net KiddiePorn Hype on TV

• 1995-09-25 (Sun, 24 Sep 95 21:28:51 PDT) - Net KiddiePorn Hype on TV - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

getting netscape to support the remailers

• 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 06:17:02 PDT) - getting netscape to support the remailers - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:06:56 PDT) - Re: getting netscape to support the remailers - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-09-27 (Wed, 27 Sep 95 02:37:36 PDT) - Re: getting netscape to support the remailers - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>

Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)

• 1995-09-27 (Wed, 27 Sep 95 10:23:54 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - donlonm@ccmail.mcclellan.af.mil
  • 1995-09-28 (Wed, 27 Sep 95 20:44:36 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-09-28 (Wed, 27 Sep 95 22:49:54 PDT) - Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole) - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)

Re: NetScape’s dependence upon RSA down for the count!

• 1995-10-01 (Sun, 1 Oct 95 13:44:42 PDT) - Re: NetScape’s dependence upon RSA down for the count! - William.Soley@Eng.Sun.COM (William Soley)
  • 1995-10-02 (Sun, 1 Oct 95 22:16:19 PDT) - User-Specified Trusted CAs in Netscape (Was: Re: NetScape’s dependence upon RSA down for the count!) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-10-03 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 23:20:12 PDT) - Re: User-Specified Trusted CAs in Netscape (Was: Re: NetScape’s dependence upon RSA down for the count!) - jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)

Hack Microsoft?

• 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 06:10:22 PDT) - Hack Microsoft? - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
  • 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 07:45:11 PDT) - Re: Hack Microsoft? - Tim Scanlon <tfs@vampire.science.gmu.edu>
  • 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 13:46:55 PDT) - Re: Hack Microsoft? - hallam@w3.org
  • 1995-10-02 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 01:11:28 PDT) - Re: C2 Evaluation of Win NT (was: Hack Microsoft?) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: `Hack Microsoft’ challenge is NYT Computer News Daily’s top story

• 1995-10-03 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 18:38:32 PDT) - Re: `Hack Microsoft’ challenge is NYT Computer News Daily’s top story - MIGUELDIAZ@megaweb.com ()
  • 1995-10-03 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 20:06:38 PDT) - Re: `Hack Microsoft’ challenge is NYT Computer News Daily’s top story - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-03 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 23:12:37 PDT) - Re: `Hack Microsoft’ challenge is NYT Computer News Daily’s top story - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>

NYT: WWW Usage Monitoring for Marketing

• 1995-10-04 (Tue, 3 Oct 95 20:30:54 PDT) - NYT: WWW Usage Monitoring for Marketing - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

David Chaum testimony

• 1995-10-04 (Wed, 4 Oct 95 12:27:30 PDT) - David Chaum testimony - Jerry_Ellig@jec.senate.gov
  • 1995-10-04 (Wed, 4 Oct 95 15:09:14 PDT) - Re: David Chaum testimony - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Crypto APIs

• 1995-10-05 (Wed, 4 Oct 95 22:33:04 PDT) - Re: Crypto APIs - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1995-10-05 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 00:55:26 PDT) - NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-05 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 13:37:46 PDT) - Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Graphic encryption

• 1995-10-06 (Fri, 6 Oct 95 08:17:23 PDT) - Graphic encryption - privsoft@ix.netcom.com (Steve )
  • 1995-10-06 (Fri, 6 Oct 95 12:38:54 PDT) - Re: Graphic encryption - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Graphic encryption

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-10-11 (Tue, 10 Oct 95 19:27:00 PDT) - Re: Graphic encryption - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: spam detector algorithm?

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-10-11 (Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:03:59 PDT) - Re: spam detector algorithm? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 07:20:27 PDT) - Re: spam detector algorithm? - Jonathan Litt <littlitt@MIT.EDU>

Re: Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time)

• 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 07:44:35 PDT) - Re: Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time) - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 08:21:08 PDT) - Re: Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

CoCom and Crypto Export

• 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:36:23 PDT) - CoCom and Crypto Export - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?

• 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:51:43 PDT) - Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Certificate proposal

• 1995-10-02 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 08:57:01 PDT) - Certificate proposal - Carl Ellison <cme@TIS.COM>
  • 1995-10-02 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 10:13:58 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
    • 1995-10-02 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 15:03:37 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Carl Ellison <cme@TIS.COM>
  • 1995-10-05 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 12:25:49 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-10-05 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 16:02:51 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Bob Smart <smart@mel.dit.csiro.au>
    • 1995-10-06 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 17:56:42 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
  • 1995-10-05 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 16:07:56 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
    • 1995-10-06 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 17:32:26 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
  • 1995-10-06 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 17:41:02 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1995-10-06 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 20:59:01 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - tomw@orac.engr.sgi.com (Tom Weinstein)
    • 1995-10-06 (Fri, 6 Oct 95 00:04:44 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1995-10-06 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 21:20:34 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-10-12 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 18:47:53 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
      • 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 00:08:31 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-10-06 (Thu, 5 Oct 95 23:59:32 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1995-10-06 (Fri, 6 Oct 95 00:08:18 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1995-10-06 (Fri, 6 Oct 95 12:12:42 PDT) - Re: Certificate proposal - tomw@orac.engr.sgi.com (Tom Weinstein)

Banque des Cypherpunks

• 1995-10-11 (Tue, 10 Oct 95 22:59:59 PDT) - Banque des Cypherpunks - sdavidm@iconz.co.nz (David Murray)
  • 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 10:51:56 PDT) - Re: Banque des Cypherpunks - aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
    • 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:43:53 PDT) - Re: Banque des Cypherpunks - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
      • 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 00:30:13 PDT) - Re: Judicial Access to Keys (Was: Re: Banque des Cypherpunks) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-10-13 (Fri, 13 Oct 95 07:39:35 PDT) - Re: Judicial Access to Keys (Was: Re: Banque des Cypherpunks) - Brian Davis <bdavis@dg.thepoint.net>
  • 1995-10-11 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 11:01:18 PDT) - Re: Banque des Cypherpunks - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>

Aquaria wars ?

• 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 10:09:37 PDT) - Aquaria wars ? - danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)
  • 1995-10-13 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 20:24:39 PDT) - [NOISE] Re: Aquaria wars ? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

responce to graphic encryption replies

• 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 10:33:52 PDT) - responce to graphic encryption replies - privsoft@ix.netcom.com (Steve )Steve Orrin@ix.netcom.com, Mgr.Tech.Services@ix.netcom.com, PrivaSoft@ix.netcom.com
  • 1995-10-13 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 21:33:02 PDT) - Re: responce to graphic encryption replies - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-13 (Fri, 13 Oct 95 08:35:08 PDT) - Re: responce to graphic encryption replies - Ron McCoy <rmccoy@mercury.interpath.com>

Re: PA Remailer Concerns

• 1995-10-15 (Sat, 14 Oct 95 23:48:32 PDT) - Re: PA Remailer Concerns - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
  • 1995-10-15 (Sun, 15 Oct 95 12:58:22 PDT) - Re: PA Remailer Concerns - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>
    • 1995-10-16 (Sun, 15 Oct 95 18:42:30 PDT) - Re: PA Remailer Concerns - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
      • 1995-10-16 (Sun, 15 Oct 95 19:13:48 PDT) - Re: PA Remailer Concerns - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-10-16 (Sun, 15 Oct 95 19:33:27 PDT) - Re: PA Remailer Concerns - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
      • 1995-10-16 (Sun, 15 Oct 95 19:32:40 PDT) - Re: PA Remailer Concerns (and one very stupid joke) - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca

Anonymity: A Modest Proposal

• 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 04:59:35 PDT) - Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Modemac <modemac@netcom.com>
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 06:55:06 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 08:54:46 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Eli Brandt <eli@UX3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>
      • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 09:38:06 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
        • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 11:19:42 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Eli Brandt <eli@UX3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>
        • 1995-10-19 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 18:21:36 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
      • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 09:39:41 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 08:18:52 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 09:13:22 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 09:52:37 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>

Oh to be a mouse in the corner…

• 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 11:31:30 PDT) - Oh to be a mouse in the corner… - Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 12:31:22 PDT) - Brief Rant (Re: Oh to be a mouse in the corner…) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 13:16:37 PDT) - Re: Brief Rant (Re: Oh to be a mouse in the corner…) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: Netscape rewards are an insult

• 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 11:41:00 PDT) - Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 12:46:03 PDT) - Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 13:28:47 PDT) - [NOISE] Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-10-18 (Wed, 18 Oct 95 14:51:43 PDT) - [NOISE] Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - Dan Marner <dmarner@mis.nu.edu>

airport security

• 1995-10-14 (Sat, 14 Oct 95 04:18:49 PDT) - airport security - “Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>
  • 1995-10-15 (Sun, 15 Oct 95 14:31:19 PDT) - Re: airport security - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
    • 1995-10-15 (Sun, 15 Oct 95 15:34:03 PDT) - Re: airport security - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
    • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 02:25:47 PDT) - Re: airport security - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 07:41:40 PDT) - Re: airport security - Philip R. Moyer <prm@rome.isl.sri.com>

Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 01:48:30 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - tomw@orac.engr.sgi.com (Tom Weinstein)
    • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 02:30:47 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: MKE Threat Assessments

• 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 03:41:46 PDT) - Re: MKE Threat Assessments - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape

• 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 07:40:27 PDT) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape - pdlamb@iquest.com (Patrick Lamb)
  • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 08:00:57 PDT) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 09:57:42 PDT) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
      • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 10:21:18 PDT) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
        • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 11:30:49 PDT) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 11:43:55 PDT) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape - rthomas@pamd.cig.mot.com (Robert Owen Thomas)
        • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 13:07:42 PDT) - Re: Postscript and 50 ways [MAJOR NOISE] [long] - Michael H. Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com>
        • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 16:18:43 PDT) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>

Re: Netscape rewards are an insult

• 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 10:23:54 PDT) - Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
  • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 12:10:42 PDT) - Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 15:04:19 PDT) - [NOISE] Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 16:25:55 PDT) - Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
  • 1995-10-20 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 22:20:20 PDT) - Re: Netscape rewards are an insult - djw@pdcorp.com (Dan Weinstein)
  • 1995-10-20 (Fri, 20 Oct 95 03:13:54 PDT) - Re: [META-NOISE] W3 - Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>

[reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?

• 1995-10-20 (Fri, 20 Oct 95 13:40:36 PDT) - [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be? - anonymous@freezone.remailer
  • 1995-10-21 (Fri, 20 Oct 95 21:01:16 PDT) - Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-24 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:39:28 PDT) - Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be? - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>

Java power

• 1995-10-19 (Thu, 19 Oct 95 15:02:37 PDT) - Java power - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
  • 1995-10-21 (Fri, 20 Oct 95 21:23:58 PDT) - Re: Java power - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-21 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 13:54:52 PDT) - Re: Java power - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>

Re: require for new remailer list tag?

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 00:07:48 PDT) - Re: require for new remailer list tag? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 07:14:48 PDT) - Re: require for new remailer list tag? - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>

CSP

• 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 01:06:28 PDT) - CSP - Frosty <sotmesc@datasync.com>
  • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 08:43:43 PDT) - Re: CSP - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 12:07:01 PDT) - [NOISE] Re: CSP - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF

• 1995-10-22 (Sun, 22 Oct 95 14:10:05 PDT) - Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
  • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 06:44:11 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 07:16:40 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
      • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 08:01:02 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - “Josh M. Osborne” <stripes@va.pubnix.com>
        • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 02:32:25 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
          • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 06:50:39 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
            • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 08:52:20 PDT) - Does your software? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
              • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 10:10:53 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
                • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 10:50:17 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
                  • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 06:33:11 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Andy Brown <asb@nexor.co.uk>
                    • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 10:25:00 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
                • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 16:01:55 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Jon Mittelhauser <jonm@netscape.com>
                  • 1995-10-25 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 21:40:12 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
                    • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 03:52:48 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
                • 1995-10-25 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 17:24:50 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
                  • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 04:22:42 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
                    • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 06:55:27 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
                      • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 07:09:01 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
                      • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 09:05:14 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
              • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 15:39:02 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
                • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 15:54:11 PDT) - Re: Does your software? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
        • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 07:29:09 PDT) - MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
          • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 07:46:20 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
            • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 09:32:07 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - Andy Brown <asb@nexor.co.uk>
            • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 10:15:03 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - hallam@w3.org
              • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 12:02:35 PDT) - Hash collisions [was Re: MD5 weakness ? …] - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
            • 1995-10-25 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 17:16:29 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
          • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 08:54:39 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
            • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 13:04:15 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
            • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 16:38:31 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
          • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 10:46:44 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
        • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 08:27:53 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
          • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 09:28:18 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
      • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 08:32:06 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 12:13:18 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-10-25 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 20:02:23 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - Nesta Stubbs <nesta@cynico.com>
  • 1995-10-24 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 17:31:07 PDT) - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF - roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)

Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal

• 1995-10-22 (Sun, 22 Oct 95 09:55:24 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - loki@obscura.com (Lance Cottrell)
  • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:45:03 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-10-24 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 17:25:54 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
      • 1995-10-24 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:04:04 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - Alex de Joode <usura@replay.com>
  • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:58:22 PDT) - Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Verification of Registration

• 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 05:24:02 PDT) - Re: Verification of Registration - “Lynne L. Harrison” <lharrison@mhv.net>
  • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 05:56:16 PDT) - Re: Verification of Registration - rthomas@pamd.cig.mot.com (Robert Owen Thomas)
  • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 08:08:38 PDT) - Re: Verification of Registration - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Hacking commercial systems.

• 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 07:17:43 PDT) - Hacking commercial systems. - hallam@w3.org
  • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 08:39:49 PDT) - Re: Hacking commercial systems. - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

USA Today Against ITAR & GAK

• 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 13:51:45 PDT) - USA Today Against ITAR & GAK - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

BlackNet Meets Stanford Law School

• 1995-10-25 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 18:10:23 PDT) - BlackNet Meets Stanford Law School - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 00:25:33 PDT) - Froomkin papers (Was: BlackNet Meets Stanford Law School) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act

• 1995-10-30 (Mon, 30 Oct 1995 10:51:10 +0800) - Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act - msprague@owens.ridgecrest.ca.us (M. F. (Pat) Sprague)
  • 1995-10-30 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 02:16:34 +0800) - Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG

• 1995-10-30 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 02:46:42 +0800) - Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  • 1995-10-30 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 03:40:01 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - James Black <black@sunflash.eng.usf.edu>
    • 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:14:59 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes@Eng.Auburn.EDU>
      • 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 10:17:33 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        • 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 10:30:26 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - James Black <black@eng.usf.edu>
      • 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 15:05:54 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Kevin L Prigge <klp@gold.tc.umn.edu>
        • 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 07:48:45 +0800) - PGP On shared machines (was Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  • 1995-10-30 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 05:27:28 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:28:57 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - hallam@w3.org
    • 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 10:21:14 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
    • 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 02:12:43 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
    • 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 04:42:06 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 05:45:06 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - hallam@w3.org
        • 1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 22:25:17 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

ecash remailer

• 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 02:17:21 +0800) - ecash remailer - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 03:33:11 +0800) - Re: ecash remailer - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 05:33:03 +0800) - Re: ecash remailer - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 09:22:23 +0800) - Re: ecash remailer - “Don M. Kitchen” <don@cs.byu.edu>
      • 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 12:17:49 +0800) - Re: ecash remailer - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
      • 1995-11-03 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 04:02:55 +0800) - Re: ecash remailer - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>

Re: ecash remailer

• 1995-11-01 (Tue, 31 Oct 95 19:21:19 PST) - Re: ecash remailer - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 13:58:05 +0800) - Re: ecash remailer - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

W3 Self-Regulation?

• 1995-11-01 (Tue, 31 Oct 95 19:23:43 PST) - W3 Self-Regulation? - Dave Del Torto <ddt@digicash.com>
  • 1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 13:34:48 +0800) - Re: W3 Self-Regulation? - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
    • 1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 14:31:50 +0800) - Re: W3 Self-Regulation? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

“Dr.” Fred

• 1995-11-01 (Tue, 31 Oct 95 18:35:18 PST) - “Dr.” Fred - anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
  • 1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 18:35:42 +0800) - Re: “Dr.” Fred - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:44:50 +0800) - Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:38:22 +0800) - Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
        • 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 22:15:34 +0800) - Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
          • 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 19:41:54 +0800) - Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
            • 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 05:15:10 +0800) - Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
              • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 10:49:28 +0800) - Anonymity and integrity - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
      • 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:59:04 +0800) - Re: [FRED] Anonymity and Integrity - cjs@netcom.com (cjs)
  • 1995-11-01 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 07:42:17 +0800) - Re: “Dr.” Fred - shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)

alt.anonymous.messages considered harmful

• 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 01:29:39 +0800) - alt.anonymous.messages considered harmful - nobody@replay.com (Name Withheld by Request)
  • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 09:54:36 +0800) - Re: alt.anonymous.messages considered harmful - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Radiation Detectors from Aware Electronics

• 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 14:41:31 +0800) - Re: Radiation Detectors from Aware Electronics - sharborth@hai-net.com
  • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:34:38 +0800) - Re: Radiation Detectors from Aware Electronics - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 23:32:32 +0800) - Re: Radiation Detectors from Aware Electronics - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 22:36:37 +0800) - Re: Radiation Detectors from Aware Electronics - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

censored with Perry

• 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:06:04 +0800) - censored with Perry - gjeffers@socketis.net (Gary Jeffers)
  • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:58:16 +0800) - Re: censored with Perry - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 23:32:35 +0800) - Re: censored with Perry - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 01:02:06 +0800) - [noise] Re: censored with Perrymoose - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca

Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here

• 1995-11-03 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 04:49:03 +0800) - Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-11-03 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 04:35:49 +0800) - Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 10:08:55 +0800) - Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 16:02:30 +0800) - Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-11-06 (Mon, 6 Nov 1995 13:31:54 +0800) - Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>
      • 1995-11-06 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 02:02:18 +0800) - Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - hallam@w3.org
  • 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 09:40:02 +0800) - Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - hallam@w3.org
    • 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 17:40:02 +0800) - Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Kallstrom Calls All Calls Tappable

• 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 23:29:56 +0800) - Kallstrom Calls All Calls Tappable - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 23:32:45 +0800) - Re: Kallstrom Calls All Calls Tappable - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 12:03:34 +0800) - Re: Kallstrom Calls All Calls Tappable - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas

• 1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 02:53:55 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - clarkm@cnct.com
  • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 14:38:20 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 16:00:38 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 19:29:05 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - Rob L <robl@on-ramp.ior.com>

Re: alt.anonymous.messages considered harmful

• 1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 02:16:09 +0800) - Re: alt.anonymous.messages considered harmful - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

FBI seeks huge wiretapping system

• 1995-11-05 (Mon, 6 Nov 1995 02:03:07 +0800) - FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - Jay Campbell <edge@got.net>
  • 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 02:10:11 +0800) - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - hallam@w3.org
    • 1995-11-03 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 05:43:58 +0800) - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
  • 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 04:32:49 +0800) - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1995-11-06 (Mon, 6 Nov 1995 08:06:51 +0800) - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 09:38:32 +0800) - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - hallam@w3.org
        • 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 10:40:14 +0800) - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 20:06:04 +0800) - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it!

• 1995-11-17 (Sat, 18 Nov 1995 03:09:56 +0800) - Re: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it! - jimbell@pacifier.com (jim bell)
  • 1995-11-17 (Sat, 18 Nov 1995 06:47:46 +0800) - Re: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it! - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Proving I’m not Bob.

• 1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 02:51:44 +0800) - Proving I’m not Bob. - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
  • 1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 03:56:32 +0800) - Re: Proving I’m not Bob. - David Scheidt <david@math.earlham.edu>
    • 1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 06:53:16 +0800) - Re: Proving I’m not Bob. - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-11-22 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 08:42:52 +0800) - Re: Proving I’m not Bob. - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
  • 1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 04:24:28 +0800) - Re: Proving I’m not Bob. - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  • 1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 07:07:41 +0800) - Re: Proving I’m not Bob. - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

GOST for sale

• 1995-11-24 (Fri, 24 Nov 1995 11:30:11 +0800) - GOST for sale - Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
  • 1995-11-29 (Wed, 29 Nov 1995 15:46:58 +0800) - Re: GOST for sale - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Netscape gives in to key escrow

• 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:59:05 +0800) - Netscape gives in to key escrow - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 16:20:41 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:09:03 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
  • 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 95 01:00:08 PST) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
    • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:53:51 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
      • 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 12:30:29 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Matt Miszewski <crypto@midex.com>
      • 1995-12-01 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 02:56:54 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
        • 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 16:48:32 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>
          • 1995-12-03 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 13:57:24 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
        • 1995-12-04 (Sun, 3 Dec 95 17:34:36 PST) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
    • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 02:49:07 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-12-01 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 01:41:46 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Charles Lewton <clewton@netcom.com>
  • 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 09:11:10 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
  • 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 16:49:11 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)

Re: The future will be easy to use

• 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 09:26:32 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 21:02:47 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 21:09:31 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
      • 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:40:49 +0800) - Credit card theft Re: The future will be easy to use - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
        • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:54:27 +0800) - Re: Credit card theft Re: The future will be easy to use - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
          • 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 95 08:55:17 PST) - “Got a subpoena?” - David Mandl <dmandl@bear.com>
            • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 01:42:15 +0800) - Re: “Got a subpoena?” - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
              • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 03:45:15 +0800) - Re: “Got a subpoena?” - attila <attila@primenet.com>
  • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 02:38:46 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
    • 1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 03:23:50 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - Carl Ellison <cme@TIS.COM>

Applied Cryptography Questions

• 1995-11-30 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:32:34 +0800) - Applied Cryptography Questions - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 09:12:40 +0800) - Re: Applied Cryptography Questions - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

nsa and netscape

• 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 20:49:43 +0800) - nsa and netscape - “Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>
  • 1995-12-01 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 02:06:39 +0800) - Re: nsa and netscape - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 14:59:30 +0800) - Re: nsa and netscape - zuhn@sctc.com (david d `zoo’ zuhn)
    • 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 09:04:44 +0800) - Re: nsa and netscape - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 15:53:30 +0800) - Re: nsa and netscape - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

Info on Netscape’s key escrow position

• 1995-12-02 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 01:41:14 +0800) - Info on Netscape’s key escrow position - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 21:30:58 +0800) - Re: Info on Netscape’s key escrow position - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-12-02 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 03:25:10 +0800) - Re: Info on Netscape’s key escrow position - Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>
    • 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 95 15:41:56 PST) - Re: Info on Netscape’s key escrow position - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
      • 1995-12-03 (Sat, 2 Dec 95 16:09:49 PST) - Re: Info on Netscape’s key escrow position - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
  • 1995-12-03 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 17:54:01 +0800) - French crypto restrictions - update ? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-12-05 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 13:47:13 PST) - Re: French crypto restrictions - update ? - Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>

NIST GAK export meeting, short version

• 1995-12-05 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 14:48:32 PST) - NIST GAK export meeting, short version - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
  • 1995-12-06 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 16:36:45 PST) - Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1995-12-06 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 20:18:13 PST) - Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
  • 1995-12-06 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 20:26:05 PST) - Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 10:22:47 PST) - Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
  • 1995-12-06 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 20:31:56 PST) - Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>

Untraceability in Mobile Networks

• 1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 00:54:33 PST) - Untraceability in Mobile Networks - Loren James Rittle <rittle@comm.mot.com>
  • 1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 15:08:38 PST) - Re: Untraceability in Mobile Networks - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Inherent Insecurity of Internet Commerce! (was RE: Secret

• 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 12:34:49 PST) - Re: Inherent Insecurity of Internet Commerce! (was RE: Secret - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?

• 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 15:11:28 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 17:48:04 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
  • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 18:16:24 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 18:31:50 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
      • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 18:49:03 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 20:54:05 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
        • 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 00:54:29 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
          • 1995-12-10 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 22:27:59 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
            • 1995-12-10 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 22:53:53 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
              • 1995-12-10 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 23:32:53 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
                • 1995-12-10 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 23:47:40 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
            • 1995-12-10 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 23:29:07 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
    • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 21:53:04 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 00:58:15 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      • 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 07:47:50 PST) - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Python Cryptography Toolkit v1.0.0

• 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 13:58:51 PST) - Python Cryptography Toolkit v1.0.0 - Andrew Kuchling <andrewk@dexotek.ca>
  • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 23:46:19 PST) - Re: Python Cryptography Toolkit v1.0.0 - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 11:25:55 PST) - Re: Python Cryptography Toolkit v1.0.0 - Andrew Kuchling <andrewk@dexotek.ca>

(no subject)

• 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 23:26:38 PST) - (no subject) - Nicholas Philp <lumisign@c031.aone.net.au>
  • 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 23:59:31 PST) - Re: [NOISE] WE WANT SOME PUSSY PICTURES - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

digital receipts and cash

• 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 15:31:15 +0800) - digital receipts and cash - David A Wagner <daw@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
  • 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 01:46:38 PST) - Re: digital receipts and cash - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol

• 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 08:09:15 PST) - Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol - Mark Twain Ecash Support <support@marktwain.com>
  • 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 03:45:23 PST) - Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol

• 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 14:34:17 PST) - Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 23:37:36 PST) - Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus

• 1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 21:46:21 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - dan@milliways.org (Dan Bailey)
  • 1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 22:15:44 PST) - NT v. Win95 Passwords (was Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 00:14:32 PST) - Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-12-11 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 05:54:54 +0800) - Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker…) - Andy Brown <a.brown@nexor.co.uk>
  • 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:14:35 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:53:45 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
      • 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:56:29 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Netscape announces position against GAK

• 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 01:20:12 PST) - Netscape announces position against GAK - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 01:59:39 PST) - Re: Netscape announces position against GAK - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

anti-copy

• 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 07:37:35 PST) - anti-copy - aq068@detroit.freenet.org (Troy M. Walsh)
  • 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:35:26 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] anti-copy - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-12-12 (Wed, 13 Dec 1995 05:53:57 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] anti-copy - turner@TeleCheck.com
      • 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 95 03:52:55 PST) - Re: anti-copy - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>

Re: More elveator problem

• 1995-12-11 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 22:18:25 PST) - Re: More elveator problem - wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
  • 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:35:27 +0800) - Re: More elveator problem - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Is it possible?

• 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 08:45:37 PST) - Is it possible? - Laszlo Vecsey <master@internexus.net>
  • 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:35:46 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Is it possible? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

DES Cryptanalysis

• 1995-12-11 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 05:23:52 +0800) - DES Cryptanalysis - Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@cis.umn.edu>
  • 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 14:06:28 +0800) - Re: DES Cryptanalysis - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: The Elevator Problem

• 1995-12-11 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 04:41:18 +0800) - Re: The Elevator Problem - Daniel Miskell <DMiskell@envirolink.org>
  • 1995-12-12 (Wed, 13 Dec 1995 05:54:07 +0800) - Re: The Elevator Problem - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it?

• 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:35:32 +0800) - Re: Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 95 14:34:43 PST) - Re: Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: GAK and self-incrimination?

• 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:54:15 PST) - Re: GAK and self-incrimination? - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
  • 1995-12-12 (Wed, 13 Dec 1995 06:44:09 +0800) - Re: GAK and self-incrimination? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

The Elevator Problem (a.k.a. build a private key in public)

• 1995-12-13 (Wed, 13 Dec 1995 15:17:37 +0800) - The Elevator Problem (a.k.a. build a private key in public) - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
  • 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 95 00:29:00 PST) - Re: The Elevator Problem (a.k.a. build a private key in public) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: The Elevator Problem

• 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 95 07:14:58 PST) - Re: The Elevator Problem - “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>
  • 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 17:06:49 +0800) - Re: The Elevator Problem - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: The Elevator Problem

• 1995-12-13 (Tue, 12 Dec 95 20:14:06 PST) - Re: The Elevator Problem - tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
  • 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 18:46:29 +0800) - Re: The Elevator Problem - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

PGP Interoperability?

• 1995-12-14 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 02:10:13 +0800) - PGP Interoperability? - marina kats <marina@commtouch.co.il>
  • 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:37:32 +0800) - Re: PGP Interoperability? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Secured RM ? (source) (bounce-fwd)

• 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:01:11 +0800) - Re: Secured RM ? (source) (bounce-fwd) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: kocher’s timing attack

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-12-14 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 01:35:21 +0800) - Re: kocher’s timing attack - dreschs@austnsc.tandem.com (Sten Drescher)
    • 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 10:13:47 +0800) - Re: kocher’s timing attack - “Jonathan M. Bresler” <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG>
      • 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:01:57 +0800) - Re: kocher’s timing attack - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-12-17 (Sun, 17 Dec 1995 20:36:03 +0800) - Re: kocher’s timing attack - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>

Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3

• 1995-12-16 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 15:49:51 +0800) - Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:49:46 +0800) - Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3 - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?

• 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 14:15:15 +0800) - Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info? - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
  • 1995-12-15 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 07:42:44 +0800) - Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

The Elevator Problem & Groucho’s Duck

• 1995-12-16 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 19:32:42 +0800) - The Elevator Problem & Groucho’s Duck - tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
  • 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:47:29 +0800) - Re: The Elevator Problem & Groucho’s Duck - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Java and timing info - second attempt

• 1995-12-19 (Mon, 18 Dec 95 20:02:48 PST) - Java and timing info - second attempt - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
  • 1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 15:39:38 +0800) - Re: Java and timing info - second attempt - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 16:43:51 +0800) - Re: Java and timing info - second attempt - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Bit Commitment Query

• 1995-12-20 (Tue, 19 Dec 95 22:10:10 PST) - Bit Commitment Query - Robbie Gates <gates_r@maths.su.oz.au>
  • 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 01:27:32 PST) - Re: Bit Commitment Query - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 11:37:37 PST) - Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available - Dan Harmon <harmon@tenet.edu>
    • 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 15:28:01 PST) - Re: [NOISE] revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-12-21 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 17:45:29 PST) - Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available - attila <attila@primenet.com>

The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein

• 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 12:16:19 PST) - The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein - cpunk@remail.ecafe.org (ECafe Anonymous Remailer)
  • 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 13:18:16 PST) - Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 15:37:18 PST) - Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-12-21 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 16:12:29 PST) - Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein - hallam@w3.org
    • 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 06:34:10 PST) - Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-12-21 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 19:15:28 PST) - Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein - attila <attila@primenet.com>
  • 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 01:54:28 PST) - Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

Encryption Rules Coming

• 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 08:05:48 PST) - Encryption Rules Coming - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 09:15:04 PST) - Encryption Rules Coming - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
  • 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 15:07:32 PST) - Re: Encryption Rules Coming - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Telcom bill report

• 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 15:14:28 PST) - Telcom bill report - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
  • 1995-12-22 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 16:12:06 PST) - Re: Telcom bill report - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Encryption Discrimination from Sun

• 1995-12-25 (Tue, 26 Dec 1995 07:49:12 +0800) - Encryption Discrimination from Sun - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
  • 1995-12-26 (Tue, 26 Dec 1995 17:18:59 +0800) - Re: Encryption Discrimination from Sun - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Telcom bill report

• 1995-12-28 (Thu, 28 Dec 1995 23:06:23 +0800) - Re: Telcom bill report - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
  • 1995-12-28 (Thu, 28 Dec 1995 22:23:43 +0800) - Re: Telcom bill report - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

blind validation

• 1995-12-29 (Fri, 29 Dec 1995 13:00:08 +0800) - blind validation - Alex Strasheim <alex@proust.suba.com>
  • 1995-12-30 (Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:23:09 +0800) - Re: blind validation - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-12-30 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 04:33:56 +0800) - Re: blind validation - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>

Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???

• 1995-12-30 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 02:22:47 +0800) - Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - Anonymous User <nobody@c2.org>
  • 1995-12-30 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 06:47:42 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - fc@all.net (Fred Cohen)
    • 1995-12-30 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 06:58:29 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
      • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 09:59:12 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
        • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 10:17:48 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
          • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 13:54:18 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
            • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 14:52:33 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
              • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 15:23:21 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
                • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 16:15:55 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - “Christopher J. Shaulis” <cjs@netcom.com>
                • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 19:20:07 +0800) - Re: anon.penet addresses in .sigs - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
                  • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 95 05:40:15 PST) - Re: anon.penet addresses in .sigs - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
    • 1995-12-30 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 07:37:48 +0800) - Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon??? - “Christopher J. Shaulis” <cjs@netcom.com>
      • 1995-12-31 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 08:41:41 +0800) - new years resolutions for cypherpunks - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

2047 bit keys in PGP

• 1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 13:04:20 +0800) - 2047 bit keys in PGP - “Douglas F. Elznic” <delznic@storm.net>
  • 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 02:29:08 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - Sten Drescher <stend@cris.com>
    • 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 02:58:47 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - Laszlo Vecsey <master@internexus.net>
      • 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 06:22:07 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - Sten Drescher <stend@cris.com>
      • 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 06:45:07 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - Sten Drescher <stend@cris.com>
        • 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 07:46:40 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 09:39:55 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - “Marc Martinez” <lastxit@alphachannel.com>
      • 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 11:34:58 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>

Kocher timing attack in RISKS

• 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 11:20:43 +0800) - Kocher timing attack in RISKS - stevenw@best.com (Steven Weller)
  • 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 08:55:13 +0800) - Re: Kocher timing attack in RISKS - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: [NOISE] Trying to init security channel

• 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 09:09:30 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Trying to init security channel - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Foiling Traffic Analysis

• 1996-01-04 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 02:44:36 +0800) - Re: Foiling Traffic Analysis - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 09:52:19 +0800) - Re: CryptoPessimism (Was: Foiling Traffic Analysis) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 08:54:30 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: get mix-installer. (fwd)

• 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 10:39:41 +0800) - Re: get mix-installer. (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
  • 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 11:05:58 +0800) - Re: get mix-installer. (fwd) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 20:10:21 +0800) - Re: get mix-installer. (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
      • 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 12:29:27 +0800) - Cypherpunk FAQ? - Patiwat Panurach <pati@ipied.tu.ac.th>
      • 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 03:13:57 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: get mix-installer. (fwd) - Sten Drescher <stend@cris.com>
        • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:46:34 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: get mix-installer. (fwd) - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy?

• 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 10:20:21 +0800) - Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
  • 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 16:10:31 +0800) - Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 21:11:38 +0800) - Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
  • 1996-01-06 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 03:02:06 +0800) - Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - iagoldbe@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ian Goldberg)
    • 1996-01-06 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 03:22:03 +0800) - Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - Laszlo Vecsey <master@internexus.net>

Re: Revoking Old Lost Keys

• 1996-01-06 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 02:00:22 +0800) - Re: Revoking Old Lost Keys - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-01-06 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 02:32:21 +0800) - Re: Revoking Old Lost Keys - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: please stop the Mitnick stuff

• 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 08:42:48 +0800) - Re: please stop the Mitnick stuff - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 09:00:02 +0800) - Re: please stop the Mitnick stuff - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 12:52:53 +0800) - Re: please stop the Mitnick stuff - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 14:03:16 +0800) - Re: please stop the Mitnick stuff - steve@aztech.com

RE: “trust management” vs. “certified identity”

• 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 09:07:26 +0800) - RE: “trust management” vs. “certified identity” - “Frank O’Dwyer” <fod@brd.ie>
  • 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 09:13:47 +0800) - Re: “trust management” vs. “certified identity” - Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
  • 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 13:36:01 +0800) - Re: “trust management” vs. “certified identity” - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:06:19 +0800) - Re: “trust management” vs. “certified identity” - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy?

• 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 14:44:17 +0800) - Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - loki@obscura.com (Lance Cottrell)
  • 1996-01-07 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 07:59:42 +0800) - Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: e$ payee anonymity (Was: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it!)

• 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 15:50:13 +0800) - Re: e$ payee anonymity (Was: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it!) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Certificates: limiting your liability with reuse limitations

• 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 06:39:02 +0800) - Certificates: limiting your liability with reuse limitations - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
  • 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 07:22:17 +0800) - Re: Certificates: limiting your liability with reuse limitations - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 07:42:46 +0800) - Re: Certificates: limiting your liability with reuse limitations - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
  • 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 10:24:16 +0800) - Re: Certificates: limiting your liability with reuse limitations - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

[Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]

• 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 01:51:10 +0800) - [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Shri <skc@huge.net.hk>
  • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 08:14:47 +0800) - Re: [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - greeeeaaaaat* <root@bushing.plastic.crosslink.net>
    • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:01:15 +0800) - Re: [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:00:53 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 10:04:37 +0800) - Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 01:37:35 +0800) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 96 12:28:25 PST) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 13:59:53 +0800) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
    • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 03:07:15 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>

Re: The LOGIC of Navigator 2.0 ?

• 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 03:50:18 +0800) - Re: The LOGIC of Navigator 2.0 ? - “James M. Cobb” <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
  • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 02:14:50 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] The LOGIC of Navigator 2.0 ? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

A little skepticism over $60 billion

• 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 22:47:13 +0800) - A little skepticism over $60 billion - tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
  • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 02:40:29 +0800) - Re: A little skepticism over $60 billion - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: DNow2> Re: DNow2 Re: Hammill 1987 speech

• 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 02:57:00 +0800) - Re: DNow2> Re: DNow2 Re: Hammill 1987 speech - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Can you break my encryption protocol ?

• 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:03:03 +0800) - Can you break my encryption protocol ? - “Mark Grant, M.A. (Oxon)” <mark@unicorn.com>
  • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 04:14:01 +0800) - Re: Can you break my encryption protocol ? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

When they came for the Jews…

• 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 23:53:08 +0800) - When they came for the Jews… - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:54:29 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:44:40 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 02:34:55 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:09:30 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@cis.umn.edu>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:33:20 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:49:54 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
      • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 06:04:42 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 17:13:47 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - attila <attila@primenet.com>
        • 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:18:16 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
  • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 09:13:34 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
  • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:56:40 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
    • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 04:41:44 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - grimm@MIT.EDU
  • 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 96 11:11:10 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
    • 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 16:58:00 +0800) - [Sarin?] Re: When they came for the Jews… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-01-11 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 06:01:18 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>

RC4 for HP48

• 1996-01-23 (Mon, 22 Jan 96 18:22:03 PST) - RC4 for HP48 - cpunk@remail.ecafe.org (ECafe Anonymous Remailer)
  • 1996-01-23 (Tue, 23 Jan 1996 22:06:30 +0800) - RC4 for HP48 - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 15:16:59 +0800) - Reporting ITAR Violations - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Articles re Crypto

• 1996-01-24 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 03:11:12 +0800) - Articles re Crypto - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
  • 1996-01-24 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 04:25:54 +0800) - DEC Digital Internet Tunnel test server - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Hack Lotus?

• 1996-01-25 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:10:56 +0800) - Hack Lotus? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 16:11:59 +0800) - Intl. Keysize Limit vs. U.S. Keysize Limit (Was: Re: Hack Lotus?) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts?

• 1996-01-25 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 05:09:28 +0800) - Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - rickt@psisa.com (Rick Tait)
  • 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:26:33 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 01:17:46 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - lull@acm.org (John Lull)

Re: Why is blowfish so slow? Other fast algorithms?

• 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 18:41:18 +0800) - Re: Why is blowfish so slow? Other fast algorithms? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 18:52:50 +0800) - Quick MACs (Re: Why is blowfish so slow? Other fast algorithms?) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

FWD: Internet e-mail

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:16:04 +0800) - FWD: Internet e-mail - “Lynne L. Harrison” <lharrison@mhv.net>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:35:25 +0800) - Why key escrow is good (was Re: FWD: Internet e-mail) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 15:56:49 +0800) - Re: USPS Secure Email - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Ann: NOISE.SYS v0.4.1 (should be) available…

• 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 11:02:52 +0800) - Ann: NOISE.SYS v0.4.1 (should be) available… - wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
  • 1996-01-17 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 02:16:42 +0800) - SHA-2 - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
    • 1996-01-21 (Mon, 22 Jan 1996 03:52:49 +0800) - Re: SHA-2 - wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
      • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 19:44:57 +0800) - Re: SHA-2 - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 15:17:13 +0800) - Re: SHA-2 - mmarkowi@interramp.com (Michael J. Markowitz)

Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts?

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:12:32 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 21:18:02 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Nym use in the real world

• 1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 03:50:19 +0800) - Nym use in the real world - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 09:14:54 +0800) - Re: Nym use in the real world - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 22:29:11 +0800) - Re: Nym use in the real world - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-27 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 03:59:28 +0800) - Re: Nym use in the real world - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
  • 1996-01-29 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 16:00:43 +0800) - No Subject - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)

Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts?

• 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 22:47:56 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 06:34:54 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Downsizing the NSA

• 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 16:58:16 +0800) - Downsizing the NSA - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 18:23:28 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    • 1996-01-29 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 15:51:28 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:35:33 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  • 1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 03:39:11 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>

RC2 source code

• 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 11:39:32 +0800) - RC2 source code - Anonymous User <nobody@c2.org>
  • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 17:17:26 +0800) - Re: RC2 source code - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 09:10:08 +0800) - Re: RC2 source code - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit

• 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:13:11 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Peter Trei” <ptrei@acm.org>
  • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 14:28:29 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Paul M. Cardon” <pmarc@fnbc.com>
  • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 17:25:16 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
    • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 09:14:15 +0800) - Re: Signature use and key trust (Was: Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      • 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:38:41 +0800) - Re: Signature use and key trust (Was: Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit) - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
        • 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 02:13:17 +0800) - Re: Signature use and key trust (Was: Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit) - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
    • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:53:28 +0800) - On the value of signatures (was: Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit) - roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
  • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:45:13 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
  • 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 02:13:48 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Paul M. Cardon” <pmarc@fnbc.com>
  • 1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 07:07:14 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
  • 1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 07:40:21 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Paul M. Cardon” <pmarc@fnbc.com>
  • 1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 22:26:59 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>

Reply Blocks and Nyms: newbie question

• 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 08:57:50 +0800) - Reply Blocks and Nyms: newbie question - bruce@aracnet.com (Bruce Baugh)
  • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:19:21 +0800) - Re: Reply Blocks and Nyms: newbie question - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit

• 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 17:12:29 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
  • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 19:42:59 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
    • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:22:49 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Paul Foley <paul@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz>
      • 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:16:17 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
        • 1996-02-04 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 02:34:33 +0800) - XMAS Exec - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
          • 1996-02-04 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 04:23:18 +0800) - Re: XMAS Exec - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
  • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 21:08:44 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Paul M. Cardon” <pmarc@fnbc.com>
  • 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 02:16:15 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
  • 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 02:19:42 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
    • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:45:13 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
      • 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 01:59:49 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:03:11 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
          • 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 01:48:05 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
          • 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 02:29:00 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
            • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:40:37 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
            • 1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 03:47:19 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
        • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:42:02 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - “Richard Martin” <rmartin@aw.sgi.com>
        • 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:49:47 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - Mike Fletcher <fletch@ain.bls.com>
        • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:55:46 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    • 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:10:58 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)

Re: Lotus Notes

• 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 16:31:27 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
  • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:49:31 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: “Concryption” Prior Art

• 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 06:34:18 +0800) - Re: “Concryption” Prior Art - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
  • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 19:54:12 +0800) - Multi-plaintext decryption (Was: Re: “Concryption” Prior Art) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: Lotus Notes

• 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:31:06 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
  • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:38:27 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - “Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
    • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:36:06 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

No Subject

• 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:15:04 +0800) - No Subject - anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
  • 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 15:07:22 +0800) - Re: email anonymity alternatives - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)