1995-11-03 - Re: censored with Perry
Header Data
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 680f3aed0facab0a1de5963ff4f90fc300a0531f97f8b7439ec0b84fe128a602
Message ID: <199511031020.FAA24928@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <199511031355.HAA16831@mail.socketis.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-03 10:58:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:58:16 +0800
Raw message
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:58:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: censored with Perry
In-Reply-To: <199511031355.HAA16831@mail.socketis.net>
Message-ID: <199511031020.FAA24928@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Enzo Michelangeli writes:
> In any case, before Perry (rightly) send us stern reminders of the scarce
> crypto relevance of this thread, let's take it out of Cypherpunks
Gary Jeffers writes:
> Perry is again narrowly defining allowable speech on Cypherpunks.
Since Perry hasn't said a damn thing about this Hong Kong ISP thread on the
list, I suggest that you're wasting your time chasing around a hypothetical
situation.
-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com> Me speak for Perry ?
"It just couldn't be, and only a fool would say that" -Steely Dan, 1972
Thread
Return to November 1995
- Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
- Return to “gjeffers@socketis.net (Gary Jeffers)”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
Return to “s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca”
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:06:04 +0800) - censored with Perry - gjeffers@socketis.net (Gary Jeffers)
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:58:16 +0800) - Re: censored with Perry - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 23:32:35 +0800) - Re: censored with Perry - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 01:02:06 +0800) - [noise] Re: censored with Perrymoose - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca