1995-11-04 - [noise] Re: censored with Perrymoose
Header Data
From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
To: Gary Jeffers <gjeffers@socketis.net>
Message Hash: 6bcc3a5998f131ea694fd6f0f923355d7e9ac33e345326dd98246328f9f5a083
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9511031008.C49857-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
Reply To: <199511031355.HAA16831@mail.socketis.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-04 17:02:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 01:02:06 +0800
Raw message
From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 01:02:06 +0800
To: Gary Jeffers <gjeffers@socketis.net>
Subject: [noise] Re: censored with Perrymoose
In-Reply-To: <199511031355.HAA16831@mail.socketis.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9511031008.C49857-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 3 Nov 1995, Gary Jeffers wrote:
> Perry is again narrowly defining allowable speech on Cypherpunks.
Killfiles exist. Judging by the amount of ranting, raving, paranoia and
please help!!! posts, isn't it inevitable that you'll get get some shut up
posts too? They make for entertaining flamewars (remember "my operating
system is better than yours!!"? groan ). The frequency of [noise] postings
might even be considered a decent PRNG.
Shut up shutting up ;->
Thread
Return to November 1995
- Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
- Return to “gjeffers@socketis.net (Gary Jeffers)”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
Return to “s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca”
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:06:04 +0800) - censored with Perry - gjeffers@socketis.net (Gary Jeffers)
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:58:16 +0800) - Re: censored with Perry - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 23:32:35 +0800) - Re: censored with Perry - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 01:02:06 +0800) - [noise] Re: censored with Perrymoose - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca