From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 0556c01afd6912cd8d2c1642d15aff978ab5fd792a8047e66bc99aa50af99d59
Message ID: <199512072035.PAA04297@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-07 20:34:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Dec 95 12:34:49 PST
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 95 12:34:49 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Inherent Insecurity of Internet Commerce! (was RE: Secret
Message-ID: <199512072035.PAA04297@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
various people wrote:
> OK, I'll try again. First, as I recall, SECRET clearance
> is actually not very high: when I got it, I had to answer
> a bunch of questions (do you abuse illegal drugs? are
> you now or have you ever been a member of any
> organizations? have you ever been _arrested_ for anything?)
[and]
> I suspect I know what organizations they're interested in (CPUSA et
> al), but did they ask about any specific organizations?
I think this discussion of background checks for clearances has gone
rather far astray of cypherpunks relevance, folks....
-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
Return to December 1995
Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 12:34:49 PST) - Re: Inherent Insecurity of Internet Commerce! (was RE: Secret - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)