1996-02-02 - No Subject
Header Data
From: anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 299d0689a35a2ec4e31cc0442ae385ec247703dd97dcb382dae099053c749709
Message ID: <199602010400.FAA16774@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-02 08:15:04 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:15:04 +0800
Raw message
From: anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:15:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199602010400.FAA16774@utopia.hacktic.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Are anon remailers the only way to send anon email without giving up the source eventhough an organization has a wealth of dough/technology and several class B addresses? Couldn't they just trick their mail servers or would a nslookup/whois defeat that?
And are nym accounts the only way to receive email without giving up who the intended recipient of tha mail/news post actually is?
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to “anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)”
Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
- 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 16:15:04 +0800) - No Subject - anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
- 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 15:07:22 +0800) - Re: email anonymity alternatives - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)