From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: bb8248ca9da7eb2541f96664bef8482af21ff9b574afdcdf7a3bc7a4ded2e953
Message ID: <199601290804.DAA21491@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <01I0JULCV3Z4A0UMAT@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 11:54:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 19:54:12 +0800
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 19:54:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Multi-plaintext decryption (Was: Re: "Concryption" Prior Art)
In-Reply-To: <01I0JULCV3Z4A0UMAT@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <199601290804.DAA21491@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Allen writes:
> A section of data is placed at the beginning of the encrypted material.
> When it is decrypted or encrypted (depending on how one wants to work things)
> with a given passphrase, it turns out a series of bits, reiterated as needed.
> Each x bits is used to say how far along in the encrypted material the next
> piece of information making up one encrypted message (using the same
> passphrase) is. If you put in a different passphrase, you get a different
> series of bits, and thus use a different set of information for the encrypted
> material.
This general concept crops up periodically here. As near as I can make out,
the object of the exercise is to be able to demonstrate an innocuous
decryption of a piece of ciphertext which also has alternate corresponding
plaintext messages. Any scheme for this seems to depend upon the secrecy of
the algorithm, among other factors. If an adversary has some inkling that a
piece of ciphertext may represent multiple plaintexts, then she is unlikely to
be fooled by protestations to the contrary. So IMHO it is rather pointless to
debate possible designs for such a scheme. Those who remain interested would
do well to read the various previous discussions about this in the archives.
Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com> "Of course I'm celebrating!
Dallas only wins the Super Bowl once a year, you know...."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBMQx/QinaAKQPVHDZAQEjnQf/V2yiLJd8GewrywSZJrgrrUI4/IlW3pWU
5Az+rIEc0AIeGX9h3C5S8UzyLwbgLsOSvMEvtHchwGyjJf+JpROcr7OtvGjNp2Fz
WywxAuginz9YZ6+u0HTyHWPMYuCmXXcskEnuArhROVdD9ZIb1QvuOPoK9Nf7VMBs
4SaOyDphDtNa1vBqaKKr91ZPGu0Tv8sHLwBkzbJRkKRQNnSD6gEdp6JbElGAnl25
Od5BB9xdqizad5HI/1kQQjh9M65z92QHPVAH8UGyARXT+Xn+fF5Cq0Rs8WAWUELn
xIt8eAiQuExZzJB+96JP7m6TUBa/THrpmhEgEp4zMdT89q0HWosAWQ==
=lNCq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1996
Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”