From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:44:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: When they came for the Jews...
In-Reply-To: <199601101633.IAA18047@infinity.c2.org>
Message-ID: <199601101722.MAA21848@thor.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> > Citing ``the rapidly expanding presence of organized hate groups on the
> > Internet,'' a leading Jewish human rights group [the Simon Wiesenthal
> > Center] on Tuesday began sending letters to hundreds of Internet access
> > providers and universities asking them to refuse to carry messages that
> > ``promote racism, anti-Semitism, mayhem and violence.''
> >
> > But Cooper said the ``unprecedented potential and scope of the Internet''
> > gives people ``incredible power to promote violence, threaten women,
> > denigrate minorities, promote homophobia and conspire against democracy.''

The SWC has a Web site http://www.wiesenthal.com, but there's no sign of the
letter on it right now. They do have a web-form survey on Hate on the
Internet, which I filled out for kicks. The CyberWatch section of their site
is the sort of place that says (and I quote) "Is there anything that can be
done?". <sigh>

Their "CyberWatch Perspective" http://www.wiesenthal.com/watch/wpers.htm
attacks anonymity on the net in a couple of places. Here are some relevant
excerpts:

- ----------------
"An incident in Texas highlights yet another advantage the information
superhighway gives bigots - anonymity and deniability. Witness the
recent equivalent of a hi-tech hate drive-by in Texas: Someone broke into
the electronic mail account of a professor and fired off a virulent
anti-black and anti-Semitic attack to 20,000 computer users in four states.
The attack was authored by the National Alliance, whose leader simply denied
sending the message. Its source was a convenient "anonymous I.D.""
[...]
"Hateful speech is, in general, "protected speech," but is there any reason
why, at a minimum, a recipient of any unsolicited and threatening message
from the superhighway should not have the right to know instantly the source
of the message?

Right now, the Internet, in effect, provides stealth technology for bigots,
child pornographers and the like. Accountability, not anonymity, should be
the operative principle."
- -----------------

No big surprise to see these folks come out against free speech in a new
medium. Too bad they're utterly blind to the lessons of the history they've
documented so well.

Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMPP1jSnaAKQPVHDZAQEl4Qf+JUnC0XFqFvpHZ9YGlb5fW+EnsQ8gTJ4C
0for1k8zbCiR0iCL39E1a1I/SSD1LidjAPPuaaDHqORsf4ixlTIP59+Uxi5LK6GH
P9mwMViehs/OflmJrpC087UfRGsrd/KTnYeLRX4g773zsPCcChEjpj7LxYmLfZYV
1jsZBNwY+JoWEriPL9Hx/hMiJ11xY2f5RkeBp9rP6nKHvYQab365cKOcVA3DYt82
jG15jEw9p7Ub96gown1aJasr9GEj4DYkUzL74I6/0ewxqHVC8KEmdg5PdpxAJUkI
Lx2GLneBSWUqN1eGvXS2oW2PZ3A2kQ7P8Eoi7w3l7M94jsktELrfmA==
=AsJw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----