Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu> (403 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole

Unknown thread root
- 1995-10-04 (Wed, 4 Oct 1995 16:57:57 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole - Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>

Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)

1995-10-04 (Wed, 4 Oct 1995 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>

Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)

1995-10-04 (Wed, 4 Oct 1995 16:59:03 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>

Voicemail Security

Unknown thread root
- 1995-10-20 (Fri, 20 Oct 95 15:57:19 PDT) - Voicemail Security - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

WinNews Special Issue (fwd)

1995-10-21 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 03:21:36 PDT) - WinNews Special Issue (fwd) - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
- 1995-10-23 (Sun, 22 Oct 95 21:42:41 PDT) - Re: WinNews Special Issue (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Pointer to article on ex parte search & sezure

1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 14:21:57 PDT) - Pointer to article on ex parte search & sezure - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

E-mail Spy

1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 15:41:38 PDT) - E-mail Spy - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1995-10-26 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 21:50:22 PDT) - Re: E-mail Spy - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Mandatory ID in California?

1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 09:20:01 PDT) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
- 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 13:54:51 PDT) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  - 1995-10-26 (Thu, 26 Oct 1995 16:34:02 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
    - 1995-10-26 (Thu, 26 Oct 1995 17:31:40 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1995-10-27 (Fri, 27 Oct 1995 12:11:24 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>

Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG

1995-10-30 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 02:46:42 +0800) - Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1995-10-30 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 03:40:01 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - James Black <black@sunflash.eng.usf.edu>
  - 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:14:59 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes@Eng.Auburn.EDU>
    - 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 10:17:33 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 10:30:26 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - James Black <black@eng.usf.edu>
    - 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 15:05:54 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Kevin L Prigge <klp@gold.tc.umn.edu>
      - 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 07:48:45 +0800) - PGP On shared machines (was Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1995-10-30 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 05:27:28 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
- 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:28:57 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - hallam@w3.org
  - 1995-10-31 (Tue, 31 Oct 1995 10:21:14 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  - 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 02:12:43 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
  - 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 04:42:06 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    - 1995-10-31 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 05:45:06 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - hallam@w3.org
      - 1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 22:25:17 +0800) - Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare

1995-11-01 (Wed, 1 Nov 1995 13:18:18 +0800) - Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare - anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
- 1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 18:33:19 +0800) - Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

censored? corrected

1995-11-05 (Mon, 6 Nov 1995 02:03:06 +0800) - censored? corrected - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 01:45:01 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
  - 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 04:40:13 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  - 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 07:54:16 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
    - 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 06:19:20 +0800) - Surviving DNS disruption - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    - 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:23:49 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)
    - 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 21:17:46 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
    - 1995-11-06 (Mon, 6 Nov 1995 22:35:06 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
  - 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 08:49:35 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 05:19:44 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 12:13:39 +0800) - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
    - 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 14:36:15 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
      - 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 16:34:17 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight] - Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>

Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas

1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 02:53:55 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - clarkm@cnct.com
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 14:38:20 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 16:00:38 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
- 1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 19:29:05 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - Rob L <robl@on-ramp.ior.com>

Clinton Administration Plans 1.5 MILLION WIRETAPS

1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 13:33:13 +0800) - Clinton Administration Plans 1.5 MILLION WIRETAPS - clarkm@cnct.com
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 15:50:12 +0800) - [NOISY] Re: Clinton Administration Plans 1.5 MILLION WIRETAPS - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas

1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 15:37:43 +0800) - Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas - clarkm@cnct.com
- 1995-11-03 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 17:32:54 +0800) - [NOISE, NOTE HEADERS] Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 , Phones in Urban Areas - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Telephone switch capacity -Reply

1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 10:35:04 +0800) - Re: Telephone switch capacity -Reply - Noah Brodbeck <nbrodbeck@hollandhart.com>
- 1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 01:14:14 +0800) - Re: Telephone switch capacity -Reply - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

800_ape

1995-11-04 (Sat, 4 Nov 1995 21:37:51 +0800) - [800ape](/archive/1995/11/080a68e7728f69401d6f73583f7c3ed54284a4cf8771739a1534e998e399b016) - _John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1995-11-04 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 02:07:32 +0800) - [[NOISE] Re: 800ape](/archive/1995/11/4f4afde6abab738877a4df7f767665df713a9e9ea0592907c72407f712d3a89d) - _Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: using PGP only for digital signatures

1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 08:19:07 +0800) - Re: using PGP only for digital signatures - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 09:12:18 +0800) - Re: using PGP only for digital signatures - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 09:16:43 +0800) - [ID point semi-off-topic] Re: using PGP only for digital signatures - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Credentials Without Identity

1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 09:53:11 +0800) - Credentials Without Identity - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 10:51:28 +0800) - Re: Credentials Without Identity - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 12:43:55 +0800) - Re: Credentials Without Identity - Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
- 1995-11-05 (Mon, 6 Nov 1995 00:46:11 +0800) - Re: Credentials Without Identity - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: 800_ape [FUQ Win95 List]

Unknown thread root
- 1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 11:00:35 +0800) - [Re: [NOISE] Re: 800ape [FUQ Win95 List]](/archive/1995/11/10c579da9969fa48a3e740873d8ccc7dcd25f76f713f393e7a436ecd67c40c21) - _Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

DejaNews all over again–a URL for Usenet Searching (fwd)

1995-11-06 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 06:17:32 +0800) - DejaNews all over again–a URL for Usenet Searching (fwd) - “Charles Gimon” <gimonca@mirage.skypoint.com>
- 1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 12:00:44 +0800) - Re: DejaNews all over again - Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
  - 1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 14:19:28 +0800) - Re: DejaNews all over again - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 07:28:57 +0800) - Re: DejaNews all over again - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu

Re: lp ?

1995-11-06 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 02:55:18 +0800) - Re: lp ? - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
- 1995-11-06 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 04:10:03 +0800) - Re: lp ? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 12:14:19 +0800) - Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
    - 1995-11-07 (Mon, 6 Nov 95 18:20:48 PST) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      - 1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 13:33:54 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - hallam@w3.org
        1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 22:31:08 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        1995-11-08 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 05:37:26 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - hallam@w3.org
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 00:13:07 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      - 1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 13:37:01 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
        1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 14:06:55 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 21:25:25 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
        1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 23:46:19 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 01:32:58 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 01:40:48 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 04:56:20 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 04:24:27 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 05:37:44 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - hallam@w3.org
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 06:19:59 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
        1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 02:17:32 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 13:11:51 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - Oliver Huf <ohuf@relay.sedat.de>
        1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 23:07:20 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
        1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 23:30:52 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
        1995-11-08 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 09:18:39 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - djw@pdcorp.com (Dan Weinstein)
        1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:09:21 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
        1995-11-08 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 00:06:45 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
        1995-11-09 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 06:15:56 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - Moroni <moroni@prufrocks.scranton.com>
        1995-11-09 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 07:01:44 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1995-11-10 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 15:41:48 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
    - 1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 15:05:22 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
      - 1995-11-07 (Tue, 7 Nov 1995 21:19:20 +0800) - Re: Exporting software doesn’t mean exporting (was: Re: lp ?) - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
- 1995-11-07 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 05:35:20 +0800) - Re: lp ? - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>

hacker’s dream

1995-11-13 (Mon, 13 Nov 1995 17:23:07 +0800) - hacker’s dream - an407769@anon.penet.fi (jerry the golden retriever)
- 1995-11-13 (Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:30:05 +0800) - Re: hacker’s dream [Win95] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

ANNOUNCE: Curve Encrypt 2.2

1995-11-14 (Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:05:38 +0800) - ANNOUNCE: Curve Encrypt 2.2 - “W. Kinney” <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
- 1995-11-14 (Wed, 15 Nov 1995 06:09:44 +0800) - Re: ANNOUNCE: Curve Encrypt 2.2 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-11-15 (Wed, 15 Nov 1995 08:10:34 +0800) - Re: ANNOUNCE: Curve Encrypt 2.2 - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Spammers’ Email List Obtained!!!

1995-11-19 (Sun, 19 Nov 1995 09:32:38 +0800) - Spammers’ Email List Obtained!!! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

“Junk E-Mail”

1995-11-20 (Mon, 20 Nov 1995 08:11:17 +0800) - “Junk E-Mail” - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
- 1995-11-20 (Mon, 20 Nov 1995 20:54:17 +0800) - Re: “Junk E-Mail” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: “Junk Email”

1995-11-20 (Tue, 21 Nov 1995 04:15:25 +0800) - Re: “Junk Email” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony?????

1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:34:58 +0800) - Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony????? - pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
- 1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 04:17:05 +0800) - Re: Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony????? - joshua geller <joshua@isappp.got.net>
- 1995-11-21 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 05:39:27 +0800) - Re: Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony????? - Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
- 1995-11-22 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 12:03:28 +0800) - Re: Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony????? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-11-22 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 18:09:39 +0800) - Re: Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony????? - Moroni <moroni@scranton.com>
  - 1995-11-22 (Wed, 22 Nov 1995 23:32:48 +0800) - Re: Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony????? - Arley Carter <ac@hawk.twinds.com>

Code to brute-force PGP passphrase?

1995-11-29 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 05:29:43 +0800) - Code to brute-force PGP passphrase? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

break microsoft!!!

1995-11-29 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 05:03:55 +0800) - break microsoft!!! - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
- 1995-11-29 (Thu, 30 Nov 1995 06:01:10 +0800) - Re: break microsoft!!! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)

1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 14:46:37 +0800) - Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd) - Graeme Cross <graeme@chem2.chem.swin.edu.au>
- 1995-12-01 (Thu, 30 Nov 95 21:55:38 PST) - Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
- 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 14:04:23 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 14:20:08 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd) - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
  - 1995-12-02 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 00:24:51 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd) - “Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
- 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 18:48:29 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd) - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
- 1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 18:49:36 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd) - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

Windows95 “Security”

1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 09:56:25 +0800) - Windows95 “Security” - Laszlo Vecsey <master@internexus.net>
- 1995-12-02 (Sat, 2 Dec 1995 10:43:45 +0800) - Re: Windows95 “Security” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Cracked: WINDOWS.PWL

1995-12-04 (Mon, 4 Dec 95 08:52:01 PST) - Cracked: WINDOWS.PWL - Frank Andrew Stevenson <frank@funcom.no>
- 1995-12-04 (Mon, 4 Dec 95 11:47:53 PST) - Re: Cracked: WINDOWS.PWL - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: another fbi prosecution

1995-12-05 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 12:06:12 PST) - Re: another fbi prosecution - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
- 1995-12-05 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 12:55:39 PST) - Re: another fbi prosecution - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Microsoft Internet Announcements Thursday, December 7, 1995

1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 10:46:58 PST) - Microsoft Internet Announcements Thursday, December 7, 1995 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

ERA_sur

1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 06:28:04 PST) - ERA_sur - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 11:17:56 PST) - Re: ERA_sur - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Cyberia-L Archive [was Re: ERA_sur]

1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 14:22:48 PST) - Cyberia-L Archive [was Re: ERA_sur] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Press Release on Response to Microsoft Internet Announcements

1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 14:41:25 PST) - Press Release on Response to Microsoft Internet Announcements - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: FW: websurfer 4.6

1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 12:13:00 PST) - Re: FW: websurfer 4.6 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 12:50:20 PST) - [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6 - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
  - 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 13:30:17 PST) - Re: [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 13:50:49 PST) - Re: [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6 - Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>

Re: Micro$oft and Java

1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 18:04:10 PST) - Re: Micro$oft and Java - Joel McNamara <joelm@eskimo.com>
- 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 18:31:00 PST) - Re: Micro$oft and Java - David Williams <dwwillia@cet.co.jp>
- 1995-12-08 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 19:31:26 PST) - Re: Micro$oft and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: The Elevator Problem

1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 13:19:00 PST) - Re: The Elevator Problem - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 14:18:35 PST) - CP: Mailing List Subjects - Laszlo Vecsey <master@internexus.net>
  - 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 14:52:17 PST) - Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 15:16:43 PST) - Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects - “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
  - 1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 19:53:48 PST) - Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects - Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>
    - 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 14:31:53 PST) - Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects - Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
  - 1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 23:42:00 PST) - Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects - attila <attila@primenet.com>

Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus

1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 21:46:21 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - dan@milliways.org (Dan Bailey)
- 1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 22:15:44 PST) - NT v. Win95 Passwords (was Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 00:14:32 PST) - Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  - 1995-12-11 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 05:54:54 +0800) - Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker…) - Andy Brown <a.brown@nexor.co.uk>
- 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:14:35 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:53:45 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
    - 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:56:29 PST) - Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

EXON

Unknown thread root
- 1995-12-12 (Wed, 13 Dec 1995 05:53:42 +0800) - EXON - SBinkley@atitech.ca (Scott Binkley)
  - 1995-12-12 (Wed, 13 Dec 1995 01:08:45 +0800) - Re: EXON - combee@w3.org (Ben Combee)
  - 1995-12-12 (Wed, 13 Dec 1995 05:54:07 +0800) - Re: EXON - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

And the standard continues to lower…

1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 10:08:49 +0800) - And the standard continues to lower… - The user formerly known as Leslie Todd Masco <cactus@hks.net>
- 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 08:22:03 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: And the standard continues to lower… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers

1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 16:25:33 +0800) - Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- 1995-12-14 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 04:00:43 +0800) - Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-12-14 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 07:09:50 +0800) - Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
    - 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 08:44:27 +0800) - Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 09:26:08 +0800) - Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  - 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:35:22 +0800) - Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?

Unknown thread root
- 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 12:35:57 +0800) - Re: ADDRESS DATABASE? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  - 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 08:52:49 +0800) - Re: ADDRESS DATABASE? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 20:29:58 +0800) - Re: ADDRESS DATABASE? - lull@acm.org (John Lull)

Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy

1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:19:17 +0800) - Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy - clarkm@cnct.com
- 1995-12-15 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 03:00:13 +0800) - [NOISY] Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1995-12-15 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 02:11:18 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
  - 1995-12-15 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 05:00:43 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>

Re: .PWL spin

1995-12-15 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 04:49:12 +0800) - Re: .PWL spin - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1995-12-15 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 06:01:17 +0800) - Re: .PWL spin - “Rev. Ben” <samman-ben@CS.YALE.EDU>
  - 1995-12-16 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 16:13:14 +0800) - Re: .PWL spin - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1995-12-16 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 13:55:30 +0800) - Re: .PWL spin - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
- 1995-12-16 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 13:09:13 +0800) - Re: .PWL spin - Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@cis.umn.edu>

(Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b

1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 09:32:23 +0800) - (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b - “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>
- 1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:58:27 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 17:49:16 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

Update on Microsoft .PWL and SMB Spin Control

Unknown thread root
- 1995-12-20 (Tue, 19 Dec 95 20:07:51 PST) - Update on Microsoft .PWL and SMB Spin Control - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

(fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer)

1995-12-20 (Tue, 19 Dec 95 21:08:53 PST) - (fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 11:16:39 PST) - Re: (fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer) - attila <attila@primenet.com>
  - 1995-12-21 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 20:01:37 PST) - Re: (fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer) - Jonathan Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>

ANNOUNCE: Windows 95 .PWL Security “Functionality Enhancement”

1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 1995 14:04:14 +0800) - ANNOUNCE: Windows 95 .PWL Security “Functionality Enhancement” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: “Microsoft.com” added to my KILL file

1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 08:14:18 +0800) - Re: “Microsoft.com” added to my KILL file - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Jan 13 Mountain View CA meeting

1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 08:19:19 +0800) - Re: Jan 13 Mountain View CA meeting - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Microsoft has a way to go on E-Mail

1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 08:42:37 +0800) - Re: Microsoft has a way to go on E-Mail - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: NSA says strong crypto to China?

1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:53:10 +0800) - Re: NSA says strong crypto to China? - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
- 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 23:40:33 +0800) - Re: NSA says strong crypto to China? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

RE: “trust management” vs. “certified identity”

1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:38:13 +0800) - RE: “trust management” vs. “certified identity” - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:07:51 +0800) - Re: “trust management” vs. “certified identity” - Sten Drescher <stend@cris.com>
  - 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 08:47:05 +0800) - Re: “trust management” vs. “certified identity” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]

1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 01:51:10 +0800) - [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Shri <skc@huge.net.hk>
- 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 08:14:47 +0800) - Re: [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - greeeeaaaaat* <root@bushing.plastic.crosslink.net>
  - 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:01:15 +0800) - Re: [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:00:53 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  - 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 10:04:37 +0800) - Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 01:37:35 +0800) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      - 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 96 12:28:25 PST) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
    - 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 13:59:53 +0800) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
  - 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 03:07:15 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>

NSA Rigs Win NT to B

1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 10:04:07 +0800) - NSA Rigs Win NT to B - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 10:27:03 +0800) - Re: NSA Rigs Win NT to B - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references)

1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 11:27:37 +0800) - Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bitlong, with references)

1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 16:48:37 +0800) - Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bitlong, with references) - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 17:48:45 +0800) - Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Is this true…

1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 04:45:02 +0800) - Is this true… - Ted Garrett <teddygee@visi.net>
- 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 13:01:40 PST) - Re: Is this true… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

When they came for the Jews…

1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 23:53:08 +0800) - When they came for the Jews… - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
- 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:54:29 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
  - 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:44:40 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  - 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 02:34:55 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
    - 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:09:30 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@cis.umn.edu>
    - 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:33:20 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    - 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:49:54 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
    - 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 06:04:42 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      - 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 17:13:47 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - attila <attila@primenet.com>
      - 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:18:16 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
- 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 09:13:34 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
- 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:56:40 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
  - 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 04:41:44 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - grimm@MIT.EDU
- 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 96 11:11:10 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  - 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 16:58:00 +0800) - [Sarin?] Re: When they came for the Jews… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-11 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 06:01:18 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>

Re: [NOISE] Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security

1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 17:09:25 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security - daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
- 1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 01:15:41 +0800) - [CORRECTION] Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: (none)

Unknown thread root
- 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 23:35:10 +0800) - Re: (none) - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  - 1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 01:28:48 +0800) - Re: (none) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    - 1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 03:56:43 +0800) - Re: (none) [httpd finding your identity] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-01-13 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 00:22:57 +0800) - Re: (none) [httpd finding your identity] - sameer <sameer@c2.org>

Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com

1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 03:33:21 +0800) - Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
- 1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 04:34:53 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 06:22:07 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
- 1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 04:47:48 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 96 12:58:43 PST) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
  - 1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 11:14:31 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
    - 1996-01-13 (Fri, 12 Jan 96 18:53:31 PST) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
- 1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 07:08:15 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - lull@acm.org (John Lull)
  - 1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 15:50:45 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
- 1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 08:12:09 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - lull@acm.org (John Lull)
- 1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 11:12:40 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
- 1996-01-13 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 05:30:12 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Boston talk on offshore banks

1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 04:28:13 +0800) - Boston talk on offshore banks - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
- 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 96 12:57:27 PST) - Re: Boston talk on offshore banks - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 15:28:53 PST) - Re: Boston talk on offshore banks - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>

Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com

1996-01-12 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 06:03:11 +0800) - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Microsoft’s papers on NT C2 thang

1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 10:13:40 +0800) - Microsoft’s papers on NT C2 thang - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)

1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 21:09:58 +0800) - A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
- 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 05:26:59 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - david@sternlight.com (David Sternlight)
- 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 15:04:45 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Philippe VIJGHEN <phv@bim.be>
- 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 96 09:18:32 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Jeffrey Goldberg <cc047@Cranfield.ac.uk>
- 1996-01-13 (Fri, 12 Jan 96 18:52:41 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
- 1996-01-13 (Fri, 12 Jan 96 18:52:51 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Guy Geens <ggeens@elis.rug.ac.be>
- 1996-01-13 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 03:46:30 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
- 1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 96 13:49:19 PST) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl (Arnoud “Galactus” Engelfriet)
- 1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 04:10:39 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - ckey2@eng.ua.edu (Christopher R. Key)
  - 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 08:52:07 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
- 1996-01-18 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 15:05:40 +0800) - Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long) - mdeindl@vnet.ibm.com ((Michael Deindl))

Offshore Banks and Asset Protection

1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 09:57:04 +0800) - Offshore Banks and Asset Protection - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 1996 18:23:19 +0800) - Re: Offshore Banks and Asset Protection) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-18 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 09:09:29 +0800) - Re: Offshore Banks and Asset Protection - “Patiwat Panurach (akira rising)” <pati@ipied.tu.ac.th>

[noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite

1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 11:09:29 +0800) - [noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 21:55:08 PST) - Re: [noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite

1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 22:28:15 PST) - Re: [noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
- 1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 15:12:56 +0800) - Re: [noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 23:50:58 PST) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 19:08:34 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: COMMUNITY CONNEXION REFUSES TO CENSOR INTERNET SERVICES

1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 96 15:13:16 PST) - Re: COMMUNITY CONNEXION REFUSES TO CENSOR INTERNET SERVICES - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
- 1996-01-14 (Mon, 15 Jan 1996 07:56:50 +0800) - Re: COMMUNITY CONNEXION REFUSES TO CENSOR INTERNET SERVICES - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

1996-01-14 (Mon, 15 Jan 1996 07:45:08 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-01-15 (Mon, 15 Jan 1996 08:25:43 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Eggs at Customs (fwd)

1996-01-15 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 15:38:32 PST) - Eggs at Customs (fwd) - Lindsay Haisley <fmouse@fmp.com>
- 1996-01-16 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 16:31:42 PST) - Re: Eggs at Customs (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

exposure=deterence?

1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 19:42:10 PST) - exposure=deterence? - cmerritt@intellinet.com (Charlie Merritt)
- 1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 21:04:49 PST) - Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
  - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:55:21 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
    - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:31:54 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
    - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:03:26 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 22:17:41 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
- 1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 22:22:54 PST) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
- 1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 16:10:27 +0800) - Re: exposure=deterence? - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Need confirmation of Win95 password encryption back door

1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:31:48 +0800) - Need confirmation of Win95 password encryption back door - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Eggs at Customs (fwd)

1996-01-16 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 16:39:52 PST) - Re: Eggs at Customs (fwd) - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-01-16 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 18:17:39 PST) - Re: Eggs at Customs (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:00:49 +0800) - Re: Eggs at Customs (fwd) - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:37:59 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: Eggs at Customs (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:09:12 +0800) - Re: Eggs at Customs AND a quick question - Mark Rogaski <wendigo@pobox.com>
  - 1996-01-16 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 22:54:20 PST) - Re: Eggs at Customs AND a quick question - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 96 04:10:16 PST) - Number theory text - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
  - 1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 02:05:38 +0800) - Better diversity through cages (?!) - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
    - 1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 02:13:08 +0800) - Re: Better diversity through cages (?!) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      - 1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 02:52:22 +0800) - Re: Better diversity through cages (?!) - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
      - 1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 03:35:44 +0800) - Better diversity through Perrymoose. - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
        1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 06:46:35 +0800) - Re: Better diversity through Perrymoose. - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
        1996-01-17 (Tue, 16 Jan 96 16:43:33 PST) - Better S/N through moderation. - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
        1996-01-17 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 03:57:53 +0800) - Re: Better diversity through Perrymoose. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@amanda.dorsai.org>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 16:52:09 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 17:01:50 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Novell & Microsoft Settle Largest BBS Piracy Case Ever

1996-01-16 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 07:56:35 +0800) - Novell & Microsoft Settle Largest BBS Piracy Case Ever - gbe@primenet.com (Gary Edstrom)
- 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:34:49 +0800) - Re: Novell & Microsoft Settle Largest BBS Piracy Case Ever - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:15:41 +0800) - Re: Novell & Microsoft Settle Largest BBS Piracy Case Ever - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
    - 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 19:33:48 +0800) - Re: Novell & Microsoft Settle Largest BBS Piracy Case Ever - nobody@alpha.c2.org (Anonymous)
      - 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 18:01:48 +0800) - Re: Novell & Microsoft Settle Largest BBS Piracy Case Ever - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Non-bogus reporter seeks sources for story on MS Windows networking/security problems

1996-01-17 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 03:16:14 +0800) - Non-bogus reporter seeks sources for story on MS Windows networking/security problems - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Hack Microsoft Promotion Gets some Press

1996-01-17 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 06:07:30 +0800) - Hack Microsoft Promotion Gets some Press - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[NOISY ‘cept to Peter et al] Potential Windows hack (fwd)

1996-01-18 (Fri, 19 Jan 1996 05:46:34 +0800) - [NOISY ‘cept to Peter et al] Potential Windows hack (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Single computer breaks 40-bit RC4 in under 8 days

1996-01-19 (Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:57:44 +0800) - Single computer breaks 40-bit RC4 in under 8 days - daveg@pakse.mit.edu (David Golombek)
- 1996-01-19 (Sat, 20 Jan 1996 07:07:25 +0800) - Re: Single computer breaks 40-bit RC4 in under 8 days - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-19 (Fri, 19 Jan 1996 23:23:05 +0800) - Re: Single computer breaks 40-bit RC4 in under 8 days - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>

Code demonstrating Microsoft Windows insecurity on networks (fwd)

1996-01-19 (Fri, 19 Jan 96 15:09:33 PST) - Code demonstrating Microsoft Windows insecurity on networks (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

1996-01-19 (Fri, 19 Jan 1996 17:29:24 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-01-20 (Sat, 20 Jan 1996 10:15:33 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

“whom T. C. May has killfiled”

1996-01-20 (Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:56:55 +0800) - “whom T. C. May has killfiled” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-01-20 (Sat, 20 Jan 1996 15:26:18 +0800) - Re: “whom T. C. May has killfiled” - nobody@alpha.c2.org (Anonymous)
- 1996-01-20 (Sun, 21 Jan 1996 04:41:21 +0800) - Re: “whom T. C. May has killfiled” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Idea for “friendly” Windows password hack

1996-01-21 (Sun, 21 Jan 1996 11:27:34 +0800) - Idea for “friendly” Windows password hack - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Innaresting Fortune article on “Garbage Goodfellas” in NYC

1996-01-21 (Sun, 21 Jan 96 15:44:22 PST) - Innaresting Fortune article on “Garbage Goodfellas” in NYC - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Microsoft to digitally certify other manufacturers’ code?

1996-01-22 (Sun, 21 Jan 96 23:19:00 PST) - Microsoft to digitally certify other manufacturers’ code? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-22 (Mon, 22 Jan 96 05:31:27 PST) - Re: Microsoft to digitally certify other manufacturers’ code? - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>

Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls

1996-01-23 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 05:53:46 +0800) - Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls - Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
- 1996-01-23 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 05:22:28 +0800) - Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 08:10:46 +0800) - Kerberos holes (was Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)

1996-01-23 (Mon, 22 Jan 96 22:36:37 PST) - SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
- 1996-01-23 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 07:44:14 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  - 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 08:22:59 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    - 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 10:26:52 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  - 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 10:27:08 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
    - 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:30:25 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:31:23 +0800) - [[NOISE] are you a liberal? Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)](/archive/1996/01/59322f3dd56eab53651e671b96fda82e128eed4d7cde8d69a6880718fcb2f35b) - _attila \<attila@primenet.com\>_

“Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

1996-01-25 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 05:49:06 +0800) - “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:18:07 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Philip R. Moyer” <prm-ml@rome.isl.sri.com>
- 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:23:47 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Matt Miszewski <crypto@midex.com>
- 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:44:30 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - hallam@w3.org
  - 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:31:43 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    - 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 12:46:13 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 15:01:57 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:25:37 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
        1996-01-27 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 03:50:25 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 01:01:26 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>
    - 1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 03:58:16 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - hallam@w3.org
      - 1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 03:47:49 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    - 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 16:51:38 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
      - 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 15:11:12 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 17:20:08 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
    - 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:13:52 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
      - 1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 01:29:59 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
        1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:01:06 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
        1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:50:04 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:56:13 +0800) - [MORE IRRELEVANCE] Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Chris Townsend <townsend@smokin.fly.net>
- 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:44:17 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 14:51:56 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 22:23:34 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: PGP in Eudora and other mail programs

1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:15:23 +0800) - Re: PGP in Eudora and other mail programs - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 12:58:17 +0800) - Re: PGP in Eudora and other mail programs - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: “This post is G-Rated”

1996-01-27 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 07:46:25 +0800) - Re: “This post is G-Rated” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 15:28:17 +0800) - Re: “This post is G-Rated” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts?

1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 05:20:53 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts? - Lou Zirko <lzirko@isdn.net>
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 08:41:43 +0800) - [NOISY] Printing Microsoft’s CryptoAPI .ps - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 03:42:06 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 03:39:07 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 10:07:38 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 23:50:13 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - awestrop@crl.com (Alan Westrope)

weak cryptoanarchy

1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 10:08:18 +0800) - weak cryptoanarchy - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:02:44 +0800) - Re: weak cryptoanarchy - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Denning’s misleading statements

1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:56:16 +0800) - Denning’s misleading statements - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:23:04 +0800) - Re: Denning’s misleading statements - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

FWD: Internet e-mail

1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:16:04 +0800) - FWD: Internet e-mail - “Lynne L. Harrison” <lharrison@mhv.net>
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:35:25 +0800) - Why key escrow is good (was Re: FWD: Internet e-mail) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 15:56:49 +0800) - Re: USPS Secure Email - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics

1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 13:07:08 +0800) - Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:17:02 +0800) - Re: Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Possible Java hack.

1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 18:58:53 +0800) - Re: Possible Java hack. - Steve Gibbons <steve@aztech.net>
- 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 18:12:19 +0800) - Re: Possible Java hack. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: This post is rated LTC for `Low Technical Content’

1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 10:15:39 +0800) - Re: This post is rated LTC for `Low Technical Content’ - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 10:57:41 +0800) - Re: This post is rated LTC for `Low Technical Content’ - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[NOISE] Re: NWLibs> Re: Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics

Unknown thread root
- 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 18:32:23 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: NWLibs> Re: Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip

1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:30:53 +0800) - Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 02:44:10 +0800) - Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: “German service cuts Net access” (to Santa Cruz)

1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 04:52:03 +0800) - Re: “German service cuts Net access” (to Santa Cruz) - jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
- 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:19:16 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: “German service cuts Net access” (to Santa Cruz) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:51:15 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: “German service cuts Net access” (to Santa Cruz) - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: Escrowing Viewing and Reading Habits with the Governmen

Unknown thread root
- 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:47:01 +0800) - Re: Escrowing Viewing and Reading Habits with the Governmen - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  - 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:41:51 +0800) - Re: Escrowing Viewing and Reading Habits with the Governmen - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 00:42:47 +0800) - [noise] Re: Escrowing Viewing and Reading Habits with the Governmen - Bruce Murphy <packrat@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>

Re: “German service cuts Net access” (to Santa Cruz)

1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:44:54 +0800) - Re: “German service cuts Net access” (to Santa Cruz) - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
- 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 20:02:33 +0800) - Re: “German service cuts Net access” (to Santa Cruz) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[NOISE] Re: The Big Lie

1996-01-29 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 08:23:34 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: The Big Lie - jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker)
- 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 07:04:53 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: The Big Lie - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again”

1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:50:15 +0800) - [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - Thomas Roessler <Thomas.Roessler@sobolev.rhein.de>
- 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 07:58:42 +0800) - [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
  - 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:25:05 +0800) - Re: [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
    - 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 14:49:18 +0800) - Re: [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
    - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 09:09:48 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 09:59:26 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
      - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 10:37:30 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
        1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 20:17:10 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again” - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less

1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 04:42:42 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 15:25:58 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 17:10:45 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: Opinion piece in NYT; responses needed

1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 11:44:50 +0800) - Re: Opinion piece in NYT; responses needed - wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 09:11:39 +0800) - Re: Opinion piece in NYT; responses needed - andreas@horten.artcom.de (Andreas Bogk)
  - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:45:39 +0800) - Re: Opinion piece in NYT; responses needed - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit

1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 17:12:29 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
- 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 19:42:59 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
  - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:22:49 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Paul Foley <paul@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz>
    - 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:16:17 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
      - 1996-02-04 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 02:34:33 +0800) - XMAS Exec - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
        1996-02-04 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 04:23:18 +0800) - Re: XMAS Exec - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
- 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 21:08:44 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Paul M. Cardon” <pmarc@fnbc.com>
- 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 02:16:15 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
- 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 02:19:42 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
  - 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:45:13 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - “Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
    - 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 01:59:49 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
      - 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:03:11 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
        1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 01:48:05 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
        1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 02:29:00 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
        1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:40:37 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 03:47:19 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
      - 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:42:02 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - “Richard Martin” <rmartin@aw.sgi.com>
      - 1996-01-30 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:49:47 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - Mike Fletcher <fletch@ain.bls.com>
      - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:55:46 +0800) - Re: Java Sniffer (Was: Re: FV Announces That The Sky Is Falling) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:10:58 +0800) - Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)

Handy WWW anonymizer proxy and translator!

1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 17:08:20 +0800) - Handy WWW anonymizer proxy and translator! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 21:29:51 +0800) - Re: Handy WWW anonymizer proxy and translator! - “Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

[NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less

1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:39:03 +0800) - [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
- 1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 04:50:30 +0800) - [NOISE] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less

1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 15:37:23 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 07:55:42 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 17:12:36 +0800) - Re: [NOISY] Your own Zundelsite in five minutes or less - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

CRAX Mix Rax

1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:41:21 +0800) - CRAX Mix Rax - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 05:43:39 +0800) - Comision del EC contra el racismo en la red (Re: CRAX Mix Rax) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Copyright fight against unauthorized racist “Zundelsite” mirrors (was Re: INTERNET FREE SPEECH WEB SITE !) (fwd)

1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 08:08:35 +0800) - Copyright fight against unauthorized racist “Zundelsite” mirrors (was Re: INTERNET FREE SPEECH WEB SITE !) (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

CONFIRMED: German Universities’ ISP lifts webcom.com filter

1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:11:42 +0800) - CONFIRMED: German Universities’ ISP lifts webcom.com filter - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan appearing on “Europe’s Most Wanted”

1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 22:28:55 +0800) - Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan appearing on “Europe’s Most Wanted” - Just Rich <rich@c2.org>
- 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 22:01:26 +0800) - Re: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan appearing on “Europe’s Most Wanted” - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:45:45 +0800) - Re: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan appearing on “Europe’s Most Wanted” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:15:51 +0800) - Re: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan appearing on “Europe’s Most Wanted” - attila <attila@primenet.com>
      - 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 15:37:57 +0800) - Anti-Nazi Authentication [Was: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan…] - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
        1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 22:31:07 +0800) - Re: Anti-Nazi Authentication [Was: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan…] - Bryce <wilcoxb@nag.cs.colorado.edu>
        1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 04:28:36 +0800) - Re: Anti-Nazi Authentication [Was: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan…] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 04:38:48 +0800) - Re: Anti-Nazi Authentication [Was: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan…] - Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
        1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 05:27:07 +0800) - Re: Anti-Nazi Authentication [Was: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan…] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 10:26:54 +0800) - Web page authentication (was: Anti-Nazi Authentication) - Bryce <wilcoxb@nag.cs.colorado.edu>
        1996-02-06 (Tue, 6 Feb 1996 19:14:46 +0800) - Re: Anti-Nazi Authentication [Was: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan…] - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
        1996-02-07 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 10:50:54 +0800) - Web Page Authentication (was: Anti-Nazi Authentication) - Bryce <wilcoxb@nag.cs.colorado.edu>

Ways around “censorship” of Nazi Zundelsite (fwd)

1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 09:00:38 +0800) - Ways around “censorship” of Nazi Zundelsite (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Futplex makes the news!

1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 11:38:23 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 12:42:26 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-02-03 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 01:36:50 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - Nathan Loofbourrow <loofbour@cis.ohio-state.edu>

Re: Helping the Crypto-Clueless

1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 17:00:42 +0800) - Re: Helping the Crypto-Clueless - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Germany investigates AOL for providing Zundelaccess

1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 16:55:18 +0800) - Re: Germany investigates AOL for providing Zundelaccess - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
- 1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 17:20:28 +0800) - Re: Germany investigates AOL for providing Zundelaccess - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em

1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 13:40:14 +0800) - Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 22:26:50 +0800) - THIS IS NOT NUKEPUNKS Re: Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Futplex makes the news!

1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 08:02:50 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 08:31:03 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - “Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
- 1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 10:34:28 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
- 1996-02-03 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 23:41:28 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Futplex makes the news!

1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 06:32:23 +0800) - Futplex makes the news! - Mike Duvos <mpd@netcom.com>
- 1996-02-04 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 08:58:56 +0800) - Re: Futplex makes the news! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Zundelsite webcom.com <–> Germany routing difficulties resolved

Unknown thread root
- 1996-02-04 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 10:40:49 +0800) - Re: Zundelsite webcom.com <–> Germany routing difficulties resolved - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[NOISE] Sound bites re the Zundel German censorship thing (fwd)

1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 11:16:05 +0800) - [NOISE] Sound bites re the Zundel German censorship thing (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Turn yourself in!

1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 21:13:01 +0800) - Turn yourself in! - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:31:24 +0800) - Re: Turn yourself in! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [NOISE] Sound bites re the Zundel German censorship thing (fwd)

1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 11:38:55 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Sound bites re the Zundel German censorship thing (fwd) - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:22:45 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Sound bites re the Zundel German censorship thing (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography

1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 04:57:47 +0800) - The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
- 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:10:54 +0800) - Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:13:34 +0800) - Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
- 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:17:56 +0800) - Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:25:53 +0800) - Yes, I’m an idiot Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:28:54 +0800) - Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
  - 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:50:38 +0800) - Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - “David J. Bianco” <bianco@itribe.net>
    - 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 07:11:18 +0800) - Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography - zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>

[SSP] Hack China Contest, and some more showboating

1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:03:56 +0800) - [SSP] Hack China Contest, and some more showboating - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Regarding employee rights on company equipment

1996-02-09 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 03:11:55 +0800) - Regarding employee rights on company equipment - lunaslide@loop.com
- 1996-02-09 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 05:08:29 +0800) - Re: Regarding employee rights on company equipment - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

glide.c??

1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 11:57:15 +0800) - glide.c?? - Jim Small <small@nethole.com>
- 1996-02-10 (Fri, 9 Feb 96 18:27:02 PST) - Re: glide.c?? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Strange Sounds of Silence

1996-02-11 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 05:06:53 +0800) - Re: Strange Sounds of Silence - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-02-11 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:42:53 +0800) - Lib’ber authentication - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 08:28:49 +0800) - Re: Strange Sounds of Silence - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

“Helping the clueless” on crypto-privacy: the Zundelhoaxers

1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 08:51:00 +0800) - “Helping the clueless” on crypto-privacy: the Zundelhoaxers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Subject lines?

1996-02-14 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 02:56:20 +0800) - Subject lines? - olbon@dynetics.com (Clay Olbon II)
- 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 12:19:01 +0800) - Re: Subject lines? - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 13:07:03 +0800) - Re: Subject lines? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

secure web page ideas

1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 09:16:05 +0800) - secure web page ideas - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
- 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 17:17:03 +0800) - Re: secure web page ideas - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

The Internet Party

1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 16:22:07 +0800) - The Internet Party - Brian D Williams <talon57@well.com>
- 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 21:31:21 +0800) - Re: The Internet Party - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Another CDA Protest Idear

1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:57:20 +0800) - Another CDA Protest Idear - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Any cpunks around San Diego, CA want to chat this weekend?

1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 10:10:33 +0800) - Any cpunks around San Diego, CA want to chat this weekend? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Banned Zambian newspaper now on the Web

1996-02-21 (Tue, 20 Feb 96 20:31:12 PST) - Banned Zambian newspaper now on the Web - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1996-02-21 (Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:03:57 +0800) - Bravo, mostly (Re: Banned Zambian newspaper now on the Web) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-02-21 (Wed, 21 Feb 1996 20:22:24 +0800) - Re: Bravo, mostly (Re: Banned Zambian newspaper now on the Web) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    - 1996-02-21 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 05:20:15 +0800) - Re: Bravo, mostly (Re: Banned Zambian newspaper now on the Web) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

1996-02-21 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 07:53:23 +0800) - “consent of the governed” - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
- 1996-02-22 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 16:29:01 +0800) - Re: “consent of the governed” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-02-22 (Fri, 23 Feb 1996 05:07:45 +0800) - Re: “consent of the governed” - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>

[South SF Bay Area] PLAY ANNOUNCEMENT: “Breaking the Code” (fwd)

1996-02-27 (Tue, 27 Feb 1996 13:18:19 +0800) - [South SF Bay Area] PLAY ANNOUNCEMENT: “Breaking the Code” (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites

1996-03-17 (Mon, 18 Mar 1996 04:46:14 +0800) - Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
- 1996-03-17 (Mon, 18 Mar 1996 06:48:59 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-03-18 (Mon, 18 Mar 1996 08:51:01 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-03-19 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 05:01:25 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - sameer@atropos.c2.org

Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question

1996-03-19 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:43:25 +0800) - Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-03-18 (Mon, 18 Mar 1996 16:30:19 +0800) - Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-03-19 (Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:46:33 +0800) - Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question - bglassle@kaiwan.com (Bob Glassley)

Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites

1996-03-19 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:49:06 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:37:32 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

ANNOUNCE: Donut: Web Basic Interpreter. (fwd)

1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 96 12:54:15 PST) - ANNOUNCE: Donut: Web Basic Interpreter. (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

If you can’t take the heat… (Was Re: Keep the pressure!)

1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 96 12:51:26 PST) - If you can’t take the heat… (Was Re: Keep the pressure!) - mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
- 1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 96 13:39:49 PST) - Re: If you can’t take the heat… (Was Re: Keep the pressure!) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-03-21 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 04:21:37 +0800) - Re: If you can’t take the heat… (Was Re: Keep the pressure!) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Keep the pressure! Cryptographers Against Cryptography EXPOSED!

1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 20:12:41 +0800) - Keep the pressure! Cryptographers Against Cryptography EXPOSED! - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1996-03-20 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 04:39:15 +0800) - Re: Keep the pressure! Cryptographers Against Cryptography EXPOSED! - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 96 12:41:21 PST) - Re: Keep the pressure! Cryptographers Against Cryptography EXPOSED! - Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@tc.umn.edu>
- 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 14:46:00 +0800) - A MODEST PROPOSAL - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  - 1996-03-20 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 05:29:00 +0800) - Re: A MODEST PROPOSAL - Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
    - 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 11:58:17 +0800) - Re: A MODEST PROPOSAL - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 22:58:25 +0800) - Re: A MODEST PROPOSAL - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  - 1996-03-21 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 04:18:09 +0800) - Re: Shameless - Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>
    - 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 23:09:31 +0800) - Re: Shameless - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>

Upside’s TAMING THE INTERNET: Special Report

1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 18:29:33 +0800) - Upside’s TAMING THE INTERNET: Special Report - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

(X:x)e$ ‘s other use

1996-03-22 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 21:57:02 +0800) - (X:x)e$ ‘s other use - Gary Lee Jeffers <gjeffers@ns.htc.net>
- 1996-03-22 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 18:59:21 +0800) - Re: (X:x)e$ ‘s other use - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-03-22 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 02:09:04 +0800) - Re: (X:x)e$ ‘s other use - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

detweiling

1996-03-23 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 17:07:14 +0800) - detweiling - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-03-23 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 19:29:34 +0800) - Re: detweiling - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Excluding articles from DejaNews

1996-03-23 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 22:07:44 +0800) - Excluding articles from DejaNews - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Excluding articles from DejaNews

1996-03-23 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 16:06:59 +0800) - Re: Excluding articles from DejaNews - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-03-23 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 23:00:26 +0800) - Re: Excluding articles from DejaNews - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: detweiling

1996-03-23 (Sun, 24 Mar 1996 00:22:57 +0800) - Re: detweiling - rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
- 1996-03-24 (Sun, 24 Mar 1996 15:32:21 +0800) - Re: detweiling - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS

1996-03-25 (Mon, 25 Mar 1996 11:15:35 +0800) - LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1996-03-25 (Mon, 25 Mar 1996 14:37:53 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-03-25 (Mon, 25 Mar 1996 15:28:13 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    - 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:16:00 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
      - 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 04:15:40 +0800) - So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
        1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 05:43:27 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
        1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 05:40:27 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’, shame) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 23:53:54 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 07:47:29 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 08:42:36 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
        1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 02:33:59 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 02:40:20 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
        1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 14:00:15 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 13:52:19 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - sameer@c2.org
        1996-03-27 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 01:13:39 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , , shame) - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
        1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:44:45 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 23:55:54 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 13:45:40 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 14:02:59 +0800) - NSA/ITAR - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
- 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 14:35:36 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
  - 1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 04:06:49 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

About Triple DES ……

1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 14:48:46 +0800) - About Triple DES …… - Victor Ramon Aguilar Ocampo <aguilar@servidor.dgsca.unam.mx>
- 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 15:22:17 +0800) - Re: About Triple DES …… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 16:22:37 +0800) - Re: About Triple DES …… - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 16:03:42 +0800) - Re: About Triple DES …… - nelson@crynwr.com
  - 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 11:47:19 +0800) - Re: About Triple DES …… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 22:55:11 +0800) - Re: About Triple DES …… - Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>

Re: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages

1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 15:55:03 +0800) - Re: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages - mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)
- 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 19:54:24 +0800) - Re: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-03-28 (Fri, 29 Mar 1996 04:37:58 +0800) - Re: Why Americans feel no compulsion … - Syed Yusuf <yusuf921@uidaho.edu>

How to enter the US without a visa?

1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 09:36:19 +0800) - How to enter the US without a visa? - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 20:29:48 +0800) - Re: How to enter the US without a visa? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: The Law Loft: Surviving the Biometric I.D. Card

1996-03-29 (Fri, 29 Mar 1996 15:56:15 +0800) - Re: The Law Loft: Surviving the Biometric I.D. Card - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1996-03-29 (Fri, 29 Mar 1996 19:42:53 +0800) - Re: The Law Loft: Surviving the Biometric I.D. Card - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign langua

1996-03-29 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 02:57:14 +0800) - RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign langua - James Bugden <jbugden@alis.com>
- 1996-03-29 (Fri, 29 Mar 1996 19:44:33 +0800) - RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign langua - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Netscape 2.01 fixes server vulnerabilities by breaking the client…

1996-03-29 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 03:21:40 +0800) - Netscape 2.01 fixes server vulnerabilities by breaking the client… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 19:08:01 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.01 fixes server vulnerabilities by breaking the client… - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
  - 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 20:21:07 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.01 fixes server vulnerabilities by breaking the client… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-04 (Thu, 4 Apr 1996 18:35:16 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.01 fixes server vulnerabilities by breaking the client… - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
  - 1996-04-04 (Thu, 4 Apr 1996 19:46:22 +0800) - Re: Netscape 2.01 fixes server vulnerabilities by breaking the client… - Phil Karlton <karlton@netscape.com>

Very nice Denise Caruso article in MacWorld

1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 23:10:14 +0800) - Very nice Denise Caruso article in MacWorld - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

(fwd) Russians Break RSA?

1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 15:18:59 +0800) - (fwd) Russians Break RSA? - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 17:38:52 +0800) - Re: (fwd) Russians Break RSA? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
- 1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 19:22:45 +0800) - Re: (fwd) Russians Break RSA? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 21:05:26 +0800) - Re: (fwd) Russians Break RSA? - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>

Fascinating troll with forged newgroups

1996-04-04 (Thu, 4 Apr 1996 23:14:09 +0800) - Fascinating troll with forged newgroups - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-04 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 04:10:08 +0800) - Re: Fascinating troll with forged newgroups - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
  - 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 13:09:15 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: Fascinating troll with forged newgroups - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-04-06 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 03:16:00 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Fascinating troll with forged newgroups - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

.sig followup

1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 12:51:04 +0800) - .sig followup - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 17:00:37 +0800) - Re: .sig followup - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 14:30:28 +0800) - Re: .sig followup - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 02:52:47 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 09:57:04 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 17:30:44 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  - 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 06:22:00 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:18:37 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
  - 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:22:35 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
- 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:28:27 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>

1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 07:22:58 +0800) - liibulletin - Announcement of New Related Services (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project

1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 01:25:08 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 07:48:03 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 08:38:14 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 23:15:04 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
  - 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:44:09 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project

1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 13:03:07 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 14:07:54 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 23:30:39 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: Message not deliverable

1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 13:23:28 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - JonWienke@aol.com
- 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 02:32:16 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:43:30 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
  - 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 21:26:32 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun

1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 16:03:33 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - rkmoore@iol.ie (Richard K. Moore)
- 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 20:12:00 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Email privacy policies at universities

1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 22:57:27 +0800) - Email privacy policies at universities - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Enemies R Us [Political Rant]

1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 08:04:41 +0800) - Re: Enemies R Us [Political Rant] - JonWienke@aol.com
- 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 17:38:35 +0800) - Re: Enemies R Us [Political Rant] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: CDA Court Challenge: Update #7 (Ducks on the Net)

1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 20:05:04 +0800) - Re: CDA Court Challenge: Update #7 (Ducks on the Net) - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-16 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 02:32:14 +0800) - Re: CDA Court Challenge: Update #7 (Ducks on the Net) - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
- 1996-04-16 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 07:38:33 +0800) - Re: CDA Court Challenge: Update #7 (Ducks on the Net) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

That All.net loon…

1996-04-17 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 21:10:42 +0800) - That All.net loon… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Clinton blathering about Internet terror

1996-04-17 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:52:22 +0800) - Clinton blathering about Internet terror - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
- 1996-04-17 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 06:17:56 +0800) - Re: Clinton blathering about Internet terror - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-18 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 02:32:13 +0800) - Re: Clinton blathering about Internet - Tom Cooper <tcooper@wwa.com>
    - 1996-04-18 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 06:01:37 +0800) - Re: Clinton blathering about Internet - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Oklahoma City - One Year Later - The Coverup Continues !

1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 10:53:09 +0800) - Oklahoma City - One Year Later - The Coverup Continues ! - ssalgaller@CCGATE.HAC.COM
- 1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 11:44:34 +0800) - Re: Oklahoma City - One Year Later - The Coverup Continues ! - Lisa Pease <lpease@netcom.com>
- 1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:43:20 +0800) - ILF, SAC chapter [was Yadda Yadda Re: Oklahoma City- One Year Later] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Cypherpunks Death Penalty for “take me of” messages?

1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:16:46 +0800) - Cypherpunks Death Penalty for “take me of” messages? - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 16:19:47 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks Death Penalty for “take me of” messages? - sameer@c2.org
- 1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 22:28:47 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks Death Penalty for “take me of” messages? - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
  - 1996-04-18 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 02:13:07 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks Death Penalty for “take me of” messages? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    - 1996-04-18 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 05:18:17 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks Death Penalty for “take me of” messages? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-18 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 01:07:50 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks Death Penalty for “take me of” messages? - John Robert LoVerso <john@loverso.southborough.ma.us>

Announce: new Microsoft CryptoAPI mailing list (fwd)

1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 14:32:37 +0800) - Announce: new Microsoft CryptoAPI mailing list (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

(Fwd)

1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 15:49:23 +0800) - (Fwd) - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 16:42:08 +0800) - DANGER! Baby-Food Bombs on the Internet! [was Re: (Fwd)] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-19 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 06:45:23 +0800) - Re: DANGER! Baby-Food Bombs on the Internet! [was Re: (Fwd)] - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
- 1996-04-20 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 14:04:57 +0800) - Baby-Food Bombing and highly selective quoting - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Nazis on the Net

1996-04-22 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 11:28:25 +0800) - Nazis on the Net - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-04-22 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 06:41:06 +0800) - Re: Nazis on the Net - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

NTFS Support for DOS/Win3.x,95 (fwd)

1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 16:30:36 +0800) - NTFS Support for DOS/Win3.x,95 (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Nazis on the Net

1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 19:02:15 +0800) - Re: Nazis on the Net - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 17:03:53 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Rabbi Hier Testimony

1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 13:06:37 +0800) - Rabbi Hier Testimony - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 13:12:07 +0800) - Re: Rabbi Hier Testimony - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 15:06:44 +0800) - Re: Rabbi Hier Testimony - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:39:41 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Rabbi Hier Testimony - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 16:03:51 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Rabbi Hier Testimony - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:37:11 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Rabbi Hier Testimony - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
      - 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:42:06 -0700 (PDT)) - [Yadda Yadda :-)] Re: Rabbi Hier Testimony - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net

1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12:52:29 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 17:06:24 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

?

1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:56:07 +0800) - ? - Buck213@aol.com
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 19:04:15 +0800) - Re: ? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Militias, reputation capital, unfounded rumor-mongering, and the DNS

1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:37:54 -0700 (PDT)) - Militias, reputation capital, unfounded rumor-mongering, and the DNS - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:38:11 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Militias, reputation capital, unfounded rumor-mongering, and the DNS - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT)) - [Yadda Yadda :-)] Re: Militias, reputation capital, unfounded , rumor-mongering, and the DNS - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

GIV_way

1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 06:16:37 -0700 (PDT)) - GIV_way - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:41:45 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: GIV_way - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: The Iron Mountain Report

1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 17:48:07 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: The Iron Mountain Report - minow@apple.com (Martin Minow)
- 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:33:28 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: The Iron Mountain Report - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 06:39:25 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: The Iron Mountain Report - hieronym@desk.nl (t byfield)

The Iron Mountain Report

1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 15:14:01 -0700 (PDT)) - The Iron Mountain Report - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 23:27:38 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: The Iron Mountain Report - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
  - 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:17:50 -0700 (PDT)) - [DETWEILING?] Re: The Iron Mountain Report - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 03:31:06 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: The Iron Mountain Report - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>

Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire

1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:38:34 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  - 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:24:03 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 05:09:50 +0800) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - bryce@digicash.com
    - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 10:33:56 +0800) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    - 1996-04-29 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 02:02:30 +0800) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
      - 1996-04-29 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 02:25:44 +0800) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - bryce@digicash.com
        1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 09:44:27 +0800) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  - 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 05:26:58 +0800) - connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - bryce@digicash.com
    - 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 06:50:31 +0800) - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
    - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 09:30:09 +0800) - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 19:21:10 +0800) - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - sameer@c2.org
        1996-04-29 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 02:46:18 +0800) - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - bryce@digicash.com
        1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 14:40:44 +0800) - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 23:46:05 +0800) - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - bryce@digicash.com
- 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 04:18:44 +0800) - Re: arbiter/escrow agent for hire - bryce@digicash.com

RE: Mindshare and Java

1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 08:08:47 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: Mindshare and Java - Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:54:15 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [NOISE] The Iron Mountain Report

1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 13:49:13 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] The Iron Mountain Report - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 14:45:26 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] The Iron Mountain Report - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Hack MSN anyone?

1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 13:55:46 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Hack MSN anyone? - Lee Fisher <leefi@microsoft.com>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Hack MSN anyone? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Mindshare and Java

1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 13:23:18 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 16:35:29 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  - 1996-04-26 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 17:00:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 17:52:30 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking

1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 16:23:29 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1996-04-26 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 17:09:50 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 22:13:24 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>

[fight-censorship] Guardian Angels v. anonymous remailers

1996-04-26 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:17:25 +0800) - [fight-censorship] Guardian Angels v. anonymous remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking

1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 18:58:27 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 22:49:06 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - Michael Loomis <ml3e+@andrew.cmu.edu>
  - 1996-04-26 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:12:08 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - sameer@c2.org
    - 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 12:30:16 +0800) - Fair Taxiation, credentials, guvmint interference - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-26 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:43:52 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 10:35:35 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
    - 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:36:55 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  - 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:48:33 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Nazis on the Net

1996-04-23 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:55:52 +0800) - Re: Nazis on the Net - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:24:10 +0800) - Re: Nazis on the Net - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
  - 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:42:01 +0800) - Re: Nazis on the Net - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net

1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 06:08:06 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:28:22 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
  - 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 18:00:42 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file

1996-04-27 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 05:52:24 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 12:24:13 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Sentiono Leowinata <sentiono@cycor.ca>
  - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 12:48:52 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - “W. Kinney” <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
  - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:09:47 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:47:08 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:11:16 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 18:19:04 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:09:29 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 09:41:20 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 18:06:28 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Roger Williams <roger@coelacanth.com>
  - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 17:17:14 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Gus <angus@bmsysltd.demon.co.uk>
    - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 21:46:30 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  - 1996-04-29 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:21:14 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

Mindshare and Java

1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 22:00:06 -0700 (PDT)) - Mindshare and Java - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 22:49:05 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 12:39:29 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - mrm@netcom.com (Marianne Mueller)
    - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 14:09:07 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 17:33:08 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
        1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 17:43:27 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 05:44:44 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
        1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 08:45:45 +0800) - Proving that you’re not a nym [was Re: Mindshare and Java] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:38:08 +0800) - Re: Proving that you’re not a nym [was Re: Mindshare and Java] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:00:12 +0800) - Re: Proving that you’re not a nym [was Re: Mindshare and Java] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:51:37 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
      - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 14:59:12 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 19:21:51 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 07:02:49 -0700 (PDT)) - Cypherpunks: Cesspit? (was Re: Mindshare and Java) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:49:47 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
- 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:53:34 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Mindshare and Java - Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
  - 1996-04-26 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 07:45:15 +0800) - Tcl Crypto [Was Re: Mindshare and Java] - Mike Fletcher <fletch@ain.bls.com>

Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file

1996-04-27 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 05:53:18 +0800) - Re: www.WhosWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 14:20:54 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 03:19:55 +0800) - Re: www.WhoWhere.com selling access to my employer’s passwd file - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Cell Kill 2

1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 22:43:41 +0800) - Cell Kill 2 - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 10:52:42 +0800) - Re: Cell Kill 2 - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 11:30:23 +0800) - Re: Cell Kill 2 - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
    - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:04:31 +0800) - Re: Cell Kill 2 - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      - 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:58:59 +0800) - Re: Cell Kill 2 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

RE: Mindshare and Java

1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 18:28:49 +0800) - RE: Mindshare and Java - Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 18:54:40 +0800) - RE: Mindshare and Java - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Anybody know anything about this?

1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:54:58 +0800) - Anybody know anything about this? - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:06:13 +0800) - Re: Anybody know anything about this? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: code vs cypher

1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:40:09 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - attila <attila@primenet.com>
- 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 21:19:25 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [WhoWhere?]

Unknown thread root
- 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:26:43 +0800) - Re: [WhoWhere?] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: PGP and pseudonyms

1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:16:12 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
- 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:06:24 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
  - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:59:36 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 22:34:42 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
      - 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 15:30:24 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Re: code vs cypher

1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:07:28 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 19:34:56 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [WhoWhere?]

1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 02:28:01 +0800) - Re: [WhoWhere?] - Gunjan Sinha <gunjan@parsecweb.com>
- 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 23:53:33 +0800) - ANNOUNCING The WhoWhere? Hack Stanford Contest! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: code vs cypher

1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 19:39:23 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:13:22 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
  - 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 12:57:06 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

unsuscrived :-|

1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 13:22:07 +0800) - [unsuscrived :- ](/archive/1996/04/15ae5f72894e6d0e17f23c3aaf5aae7453480a944255761e11e625542feb899a) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[Pointer] fight-censorship-discuss

1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 14:37:55 +0800) - [Pointer] fight-censorship-discuss - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

A survey on online privacy to skew[er] (WhoWhere?)

1996-05-02 (Thu, 2 May 1996 12:44:11 +0800) - A survey on online privacy to skew[er] (WhoWhere?) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

SF South Bay: So WhoWhere wants to meet with people interested in online privacy and security…

1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 17:34:53 +0800) - SF South Bay: So WhoWhere wants to meet with people interested in online privacy and security… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 10:34:47 +0800) - SF South Bay: So WhoWhere wants to meet with people interested in online privacy and security… - Patrick May <pjm@spe.com>
- 1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 14:35:37 +0800) - Re: SF South Bay: So WhoWhere wants to meet with people interested in online privacy and security… - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>

Re: [Complete NOISE] Re: aufweidersehn, * grave$

Unknown thread root
- 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 19:46:21 +0800) - Re: [Complete NOISE] Re: aufweidersehn, * grave$ - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

An interesting front end for the replay remailer

1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 15:12:17 +0800) - An interesting front end for the replay remailer - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 01:20:05 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - mkj@october.segno.com
- 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 10:20:44 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
- 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 10:58:02 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
  - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:38:07 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  - 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:11:43 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
  - 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 16:49:44 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Michael Loomis <ml3e+@andrew.cmu.edu>
  - 1996-05-02 (Thu, 2 May 1996 17:24:47 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
    - 1996-05-02 (Thu, 2 May 1996 18:08:14 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      - 1996-05-03 (Sat, 4 May 1996 02:13:28 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Michael Loomis <ml3e+@andrew.cmu.edu>
        1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 15:20:55 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 16:17:39 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - The Unix Cypherpunk <x@x.x>
        1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 18:21:12 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      - 1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 15:48:08 +0800) - e$: The Wealth of Nation-States - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
- 1996-04-29 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:26:56 +0800) - [NOISE] Was Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s… Is now a long ramble. - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>

Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel

Unknown thread root
- 1996-05-06 (Mon, 6 May 1996 14:04:45 +0800) - Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-06 (Tue, 7 May 1996 04:47:16 +0800) - Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel - “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
    - 1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 09:52:06 +0800) - Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel [NOISE] - Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>

UK IP Censorship

1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 08:07:37 +0800) - UK IP Censorship - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 15:54:30 +0800) - Re: UK IP Censorship - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 18:13:59 +0800) - Re: UK IP Censorship - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
- 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 10:47:48 +0800) - Re: UK IP Censorship - “msmith” <msmith@rebound.slc.unisys.com>

WhoWhere Robot?

1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 17:25:43 +0800) - WhoWhere Robot? - Stephan Somogyi <somogyi@digmedia.com>
- 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 08:33:13 +0800) - Re: WhoWhere Robot? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Transitive trust and MLM

1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 13:06:36 +0800) - Re: Transitive trust and MLM - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 18:43:30 +0800) - Re: Transitive trust and MLM - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Chat with WhoWhere.com

1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 19:05:21 +0800) - Chat with WhoWhere.com - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Transitive trust and MLM

1996-05-10 (Fri, 10 May 1996 22:33:45 +0800) - Re: Transitive trust and MLM - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 08:09:55 +0800) - Re: Transitive trust and MLM - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: PGP, Inc.

1996-05-10 (Sat, 11 May 1996 05:49:43 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc. - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 15:25:27 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down

1996-05-09 (Thu, 9 May 1996 13:42:31 +0800) - remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - Alex de Joode <usura@basement.replay.com>
- 1996-05-09 (Thu, 9 May 1996 13:20:49 +0800) - Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
  - 1996-05-09 (Thu, 9 May 1996 17:46:36 +0800) - Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
    - 1996-05-10 (Fri, 10 May 1996 19:01:53 +0800) - Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>
      - 1996-05-10 (Sat, 11 May 1996 07:40:12 +0800) - Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
        1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 16:22:52 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda Heil Dave] Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 17:33:07 +0800) - Rich is leaving for thetapunks - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
        1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 17:38:35 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda Heil Dave] Re: Rich is leaving for thetapunks - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Are remailers designed to be knocked down?

1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 10:14:32 +0800) - Are remailers designed to be knocked down? - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
- 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 16:47:44 +0800) - Re: Are remailers designed to be knocked down? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Reminder/details on May 11th SF Bay Area Meeting

1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 19:16:36 +0800) - Reminder/details on May 11th SF Bay Area Meeting - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Hacktic remailer shutdown

1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 13:53:42 +0800) - Hacktic remailer shutdown - Jeff Simmons <jsimmons@goblin.punk.net>
- 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 19:28:51 +0800) - Re: Hacktic remailer shutdown - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Fingerprinting annoyance

1996-05-13 (Tue, 14 May 1996 04:36:11 +0800) - Fingerprinting annoyance - remailer@2005.bart.nl (Senator Exon)
- 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 15:35:44 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
  - 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 15:42:15 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  - 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 19:27:14 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
    - 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 20:12:15 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
    - 1996-05-14 (Wed, 15 May 1996 07:06:09 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      - 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 15:36:40 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
        1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 18:29:48 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 19:20:29 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
  - 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 19:42:59 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 19:03:24 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
- 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 15:50:14 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 19:56:42 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - ethridge@onramp.net (Allen Ethridge)
    - 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 20:35:58 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 14:51:12 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
- 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 18:01:57 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
  - 1996-05-14 (Wed, 15 May 1996 06:21:44 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    - 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 12:52:08 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
      - 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 18:40:24 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 20:05:56 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
- 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 19:44:57 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Transitive trust and MLM

Unknown thread root
- 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 13:51:46 +0800) - Re: Transitive trust and MLM - eli+@GS160.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
  - 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 19:30:06 +0800) - Re: Transitive trust and MLM - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 15:53:50 +0800) - Re: Transitive trust and MLM - Eli Brandt <eli@UX3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>

crosspost re remailers

1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 12:25:42 +0800) - crosspost re remailers - hkhenson@netcom.com (Keith Henson)
- 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 19:03:26 +0800) - Re: crosspost re remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 19:09:35 +0800) - Re: crosspost re remailers - sameer@c2.org
  - 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 19:58:36 +0800) - SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - qut@netcom.com (Be Good)
    - 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 09:24:22 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Josh Richards <jrichard@slonet.org>
    - 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 10:14:13 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      - 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 15:22:48 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Julian Assange <proff@suburbia.net>
      - 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 15:51:28 +0800) - Forced to your knees by Legal VIOLENCE - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
        1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 20:51:52 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda Heil Dave] Re: Forced to your knees by Legal VIOLENCE - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 23:44:55 +0800) - Re: [Yadda Yadda Heil Dave] Re: Forced to your knees by Legal VIOLENCE - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
        1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 05:24:56 +0800) - Re: Forced to your knees by Legal VIOLENCE - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

(Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer

1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 10:32:26 +0800) - (Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer - “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>
- 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 13:42:26 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer - Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>
  - 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 05:02:46 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 07:58:49 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>

Pointer to CFV for comp.security.pgp.*

1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 07:58:22 +0800) - Pointer to CFV for comp.security.pgp.* - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Securing CDROM from piracy

1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 14:31:53 +0800) - Securing CDROM from piracy - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
- 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 04:05:08 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 07:57:04 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
- 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 11:57:09 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: crosspost re remailers

1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 16:36:11 +0800) - Re: crosspost re remailers - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 12:12:03 +0800) - Re: crosspost re remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: (Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer

1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 06:20:44 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer - “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>
- 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 14:20:59 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) New Anonymous Remailer - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

“Too cheap to meter”

1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 16:41:43 +0800) - “Too cheap to meter” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 01:48:58 +0800) - Re: “Too cheap to meter” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 11:06:28 +0800) - Re: “Too cheap to meter” - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
    - 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 15:19:34 +0800) - Re: “Too cheap to meter” - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
- 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 09:56:09 +0800) - Re: “Too cheap to meter” - Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 16:17:32 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 02:02:33 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

No Subject

1996-05-19 (Mon, 20 May 1996 06:40:55 +0800) - No Subject - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 11:45:29 +0800) - Cypherpunks, a political “newsgroup?” - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 20:44:44 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks, a political “newsgroup?” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE

1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 15:05:53 +0800) - WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
- 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 16:29:11 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 17:40:13 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    - 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 21:14:56 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-05-20 (Tue, 21 May 1996 00:40:55 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
        1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 08:51:42 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 17:55:46 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 19:48:36 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 15:09:08 +0800) - Re: WELCOME TO THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns

Unknown thread root
- 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 19:28:21 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 21:52:30 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
    - 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 22:02:32 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 10:07:53 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Ben Holiday <ncognito@gate.net>
    - 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 13:10:50 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
      - 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 11:42:15 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    - 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 14:35:50 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

FTC online workshop on privacy

1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 17:05:37 +0800) - FTC online workshop on privacy - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-22 (Thu, 23 May 1996 01:02:11 +0800) - Re: FTC online workshop on privacy - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-05-22 (Thu, 23 May 1996 06:43:57 +0800) - Re: FTC online workshop on privacy - Roger Williams <roger@coelacanth.com>
  - 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 08:32:47 +0800) - Re: FTC online workshop on privacy - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 08:49:27 +0800) - Re: FTC online workshop on privacy - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  - 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 15:38:27 +0800) - Re: FTC online workshop on privacy - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 11:38:18 +0800) - Re: FTC online workshop on privacy - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Clipper III analysis

1996-05-22 (Thu, 23 May 1996 07:47:20 +0800) - Re: Clipper III analysis - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 13:36:13 +0800) - Re: Clipper III analysis - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
  - 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 17:34:18 +0800) - Re: Clipper III analysis - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: The Crisis with Remailers

1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 11:53:15 +0800) - Re: The Crisis with Remailers - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 17:57:47 +0800) - Re: The Crisis with Remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

SF Bay Area: Topics (?) for Meeting June 8th

1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 14:34:43 +0800) - SF Bay Area: Topics (?) for Meeting June 8th - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

No Subject

1996-05-23 (Fri, 24 May 1996 04:33:18 +0800) - No Subject - <>
- 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 09:21:49 +0800) - Re: your mail - “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
  - 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 14:56:04 +0800) - Re: your mail - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

FYA: “The ANOREV INTERCEPTS” [Usenet censorship] (fwd)

1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 15:21:33 +0800) - FYA: “The ANOREV INTERCEPTS” [Usenet censorship] (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Children’s Privacy Act

1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 14:21:16 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 18:13:56 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-05-24 (Sat, 25 May 1996 05:33:55 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - “Anders B\xdker” <flyvebed@eel.org>

Re: National Journal article sez net-activism is just political hicks

1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 16:05:41 +0800) - Re: National Journal article sez net-activism is just political hicks - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 16:49:51 +0800) - Re: National Journal article sez net-activism is just political hicks - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  - 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 10:55:21 +0800) - Anarchy Online - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 13:38:50 +0800) - Re: Anarchy Online - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      - 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 13:52:24 +0800) - Re: Anarchy Online - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
        1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 10:51:25 +0800) - Re: Anarchy Online - Charles Platt <cp@panix.com>
        1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 12:01:54 +0800) - Re: Anarchy Online - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Re: Children’s Privacy Act

1996-05-24 (Sat, 25 May 1996 06:24:38 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 11:16:12 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 13:55:00 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: Children’s Privacy Act

1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 13:27:58 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 16:40:35 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Children’s Privacy Act

1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 16:47:01 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 17:23:10 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 04:01:18 +0800) - Rawls, was RE: Children’s Privacy Act. - Subir Grewal <grewals@acf2.nyu.edu>

WhoWhere Robot strikes again

1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:42:56 +0800) - WhoWhere Robot strikes again - Stephan Somogyi <somogyi@digmedia.com>
- 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 14:42:22 +0800) - Re: WhoWhere Robot strikes again - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: WhoWhere Robot strikes again

Unknown thread root
- 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 15:49:07 +0800) - Re: WhoWhere Robot strikes again - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

nCognito is Dead..

Unknown thread root
- 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:52:45 +0800) - nCognito is Dead.. - Ben Holiday <ncognito@gate.net>
  - 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 09:33:11 +0800) - Re: nCognito is Dead.. - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
    - 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 15:56:56 +0800) - Re: nCognito is Dead.. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: WhoWhere Robot strikes again

Unknown thread root
- 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 16:10:29 +0800) - Re: WhoWhere Robot strikes again - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

SEM_tex

1996-05-28 (Tue, 28 May 1996 12:36:39 +0800) - SEM_tex - jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
- 1996-05-28 (Tue, 28 May 1996 15:45:16 +0800) - Re: SEM_tex - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

noneAttn Sameer: Are alias@alpha.c2.org and/or remail@c2.org down?

1996-05-28 (Tue, 28 May 1996 11:10:17 +0800) - noneAttn Sameer: Are alias@alpha.c2.org and/or remail@c2.org down? - nobody@flame.alias.net (Anonymous)
- 1996-05-28 (Tue, 28 May 1996 16:18:08 +0800) - Re: none [mail2news broke] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

INteresting tidbit

1996-05-29 (Thu, 30 May 1996 01:42:03 +0800) - INteresting tidbit - JOlson <jolson3@netbox.com>
- 1996-05-29 (Thu, 30 May 1996 03:44:54 +0800) - Re: INteresting tidbit - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  - 1996-05-30 (Thu, 30 May 1996 09:39:00 +0800) - Re: INteresting tidbit - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing”

1996-05-29 (Thu, 30 May 1996 06:04:43 +0800) - Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-05-30 (Thu, 30 May 1996 12:54:48 +0800) - Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Optimism re NRC Cryptography Report

1996-05-31 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 06:45:36 +0800) - Optimism re NRC Cryptography Report - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-06-01 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 11:14:43 +0800) - Re: Optimism re NRC Cryptography Report - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing”

1996-06-02 (Sun, 2 Jun 1996 09:04:55 +0800) - Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing” - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-06-03 (Mon, 3 Jun 1996 11:55:42 +0800) - Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

[NOISE] rec.music.white-power failed 592:33033 FYI

1996-06-04 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 15:19:33 +0800) - [NOISE] rec.music.white-power failed 592:33033 FYI - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Terrorism Hysteria on the Net

1996-06-05 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 01:14:53 +0800) - Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
- 1996-06-06 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 19:05:34 +0800) - Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-06-06 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 00:21:16 +0800) - Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
- 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 15:11:22 +0800) - Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  - 1996-06-12 (Wed, 12 Jun 1996 12:30:39 +0800) - Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
    - 1996-06-12 (Thu, 13 Jun 1996 03:37:29 +0800) - Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - “Bruce M.” <brucem@wichita.fn.net>

Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution

1996-06-06 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 21:42:49 +0800) - Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution - Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
- 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 20:01:30 +0800) - Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 14:53:36 +0800) - Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

ALERT: Court decision expected soon in free speech case; spreadthe word! (fwd)

1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 12:28:28 +0800) - ALERT: Court decision expected soon in free speech case; spreadthe word! (fwd) - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
- 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 21:47:39 +0800) - Re: ALERT: Court decision expected soon in free speech case; spread the word! (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

“Fascism is corporatism”

1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 21:12:26 +0800) - “Fascism is corporatism” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 15:39:59 +0800) - Re: “Fascism is corporatism” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Internet solution for law enforcement

1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 12:29:39 +0800) - Internet solution for law enforcement - caal@hopf.dnai.com
- 1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 09:31:54 +0800) - Internet solution for law enforcement - nelson@crynwr.com
  - 1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 15:54:30 +0800) - Re: Internet solution for law enforcement - “Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>
- 1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 16:30:22 +0800) - Re: Internet solution for law enforcement - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-06-08 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 05:57:57 +0800) - Re: Internet solution for law enforcement - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  - 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:10:31 +0800) - Re: Internet solution for law enforcement - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Thank you for the Archives 100 messages

1996-06-07 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 03:11:56 +0800) - Thank you for the Archives 100 messages - qut4.qut@netcom.com
- 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 18:49:21 +0800) - Re: Thank you for the Archives 100 messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

NOISE: “Fascism is corporatism”

1996-06-08 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 07:17:48 +0800) - NOISE: “Fascism is corporatism” - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 18:49:29 +0800) - Re: NOISE: “Fascism is corporatism” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Reference Correction Re: Thank you for the Archives 100 messages

1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 15:31:25 +0800) - Reference Correction Re: Thank you for the Archives 100 messages - foodie@netcom.com (Jamie Lawrence)
- 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 18:57:36 +0800) - [WAY, WAY NOISE] Re: Reference Correction Re: Thank you for the, Archives 100 messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass?

1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 18:07:11 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
- 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 01:56:00 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  - 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 07:39:39 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

No Subject

1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 09:10:27 +0800) - No Subject - winn@Infowar.Com
- 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:25:18 +0800) - Netly News on Info War - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

HACK - Class III Information Warfare, Has It Begun? (fwd)

1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 11:45:14 +0800) - HACK - Class III Information Warfare, Has It Begun? (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

PGP key revocation

1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 13:06:06 +0800) - PGP key revocation - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 17:22:46 +0800) - Re: PGP key revocation - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

InfoWar and a.r.s

1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 12:35:02 +0800) - InfoWar and a.r.s - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 19:46:34 +0800) - Re: InfoWar and a.r.s - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Encrypting forwarding service?

1996-06-12 (Thu, 13 Jun 1996 02:14:01 +0800) - Encrypting forwarding service? - “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
- 1996-06-13 (Thu, 13 Jun 1996 13:22:51 +0800) - Re: Encrypting forwarding service? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Clinton Backs Internet ‘Decency Act’

1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 09:59:13 +0800) - Clinton Backs Internet ‘Decency Act’ - “Joseph M. Reagle Jr.” <reagle@MIT.EDU>
- 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 10:13:33 +0800) - Re: Clinton Backs Internet ‘Decency Act’ - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: PBS show

1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 11:18:47 +0800) - Re: PBS show - wxfield@shore.net (Warren)
- 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 11:29:15 +0800) - Re: PBS show - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 10:30:10 +0800) - Re: PBS show - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

SMARTcards, free 800 number GUARANTEE PRIVACY!!!

1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 11:26:28 +0800) - SMARTcards, free 800 number GUARANTEE PRIVACY!!! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

SF Bay Area: 6/18 Smart Talk on WhoWhere? (fwd)

1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 13:13:33 +0800) - SF Bay Area: 6/18 Smart Talk on WhoWhere? (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Attorney General wants to “expand crypto laws”

1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 08:24:54 +0800) - Attorney General wants to “expand crypto laws” - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 12:53:32 +0800) - Re: Attorney General wants to “expand crypto laws” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

alpha.c2.org in deep shit?

1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 10:47:43 +0800) - alpha.c2.org in deep shit? - nobody@flame.alias.net (Anonymous)
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 14:52:33 +0800) - Re: alpha.c2.org in deep shit? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 15:30:44 +0800) - Re: alpha.c2.org in deep shit? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Snake Oil on the Water…

1996-06-17 (Mon, 17 Jun 1996 08:30:46 +0800) - Re: Snake Oil on the Water… - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
- 1996-06-17 (Mon, 17 Jun 1996 14:41:02 +0800) - Re: Snake Oil on the Water… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Time (of CyberPorn fame) puts up a nice CDA page; commentary from PED

1996-06-19 (Wed, 19 Jun 1996 08:27:36 +0800) - Time (of CyberPorn fame) puts up a nice CDA page; commentary from PED - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Oil Change software snoops through hard drive

1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 09:11:02 +0800) - Oil Change software snoops through hard drive - declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
- 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 08:39:10 +0800) - Re: Oil Change software snoops through hard drive - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-06-21 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 06:29:42 +0800) - Re: Oil Change software snoops through hard drive - Alan Lewine <alewine@dcez.com>

AT&T bans anonymous messages

1996-06-25 (Tue, 25 Jun 1996 13:19:26 +0800) - AT&T bans anonymous messages - WorldNet User <anonymous-user@worldnet.att.net>
- 1996-06-25 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 05:40:28 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  - 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 08:15:57 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
- 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 09:22:42 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:58:39 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Intense <exalt@miworld.net>
    - 1996-06-27 (Thu, 27 Jun 1996 08:22:57 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

`Cyber - Times`

1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 10:36:03 +0800) - Cyber - Times - ”Cyber - Times” <cyber02@sprynet.com>
- 1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 13:40:44 +0800) - Abridged spam sucker list (was Re: Cyber - Times) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

John Grubor and you

1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 13:47:44 +0800) - John Grubor and you - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 16:43:07 +0800) - Re: John Grubor and you - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Notes from SAFE meeting

1996-07-02 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 13:31:40 +0800) - Notes from SAFE meeting - minow@apple.com (Martin Minow)
- 1996-07-02 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 17:42:36 +0800) - Re: Notes from SAFE meeting - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law?

1996-07-02 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 17:51:30 +0800) - Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Message pools are in use today!

1996-06-29 (Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:20:38 +0800) - Message pools are in use today! - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-07-02 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 16:00:33 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
  - 1996-07-02 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 19:12:45 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

SAFE Forum

1996-07-02 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 17:55:46 +0800) - SAFE Forum - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 07:27:51 +0800) - Re: SAFE Forum - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

hard drive encryption

1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 03:17:35 +0800) - hard drive encryption - Cerridwyn Llewyellyn <ceridwyn@wolfenet.com>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 09:21:33 +0800) - Re: hard drive encryption - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 09:37:51 +0800) - Re: hard drive encryption - “Benjamin R. Ginter” <bginter@abilnet.com>

PROMISe them anything (was Re: whitehouse dossier database?)

1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 04:33:43 +0800) - PROMISe them anything (was Re: whitehouse dossier database?) - “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 10:33:22 +0800) - Re: PROMISe them anything (was Re: whitehouse dossier database?) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: SAFE Forum–some comments

1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 10:25:18 +0800) - Re: SAFE Forum–some comments - Lile Elam <elam@art.net>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:18:53 +0800) - Re: SAFE Forum–some comments - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Message pools are in use today!

Unknown thread root
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 11:54:43 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - um@c2.org (Ulf Moeller)
  - 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:20:00 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law?

Unknown thread root
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 11:56:28 +0800) - Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law? - um@c2.org (Ulf Moeller)
  - 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 17:01:42 +0800) - Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 08:43:15 +0800) - Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law? - um@c2.org (Ulf Moeller)
      - 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 10:28:35 +0800) - Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 23:43:24 +0800) - Re: Info on alleged new German digital wiretapping law? - Asgaard <asgaard@sos.sll.se>

Lack of PGP signatures

1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 12:32:09 +0800) - Lack of PGP signatures - “David F. Ogren” <ogren@cris.com>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:23:54 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
  - 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 17:08:01 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 14:40:31 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:13:19 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 17:07:05 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - Firebeard <stend@grendel.austin.texas.net>

LE Risks with No Crypto

1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 12:24:53 +0800) - LE Risks with No Crypto - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
- 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 17:11:02 +0800) - Re: LE Risks with No Crypto - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 11:01:39 +0800) - Re: LE Risks with No Crypto - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>

SAFE forum – remarks of Herb Lin

1996-07-03 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 07:42:53 +0800) - SAFE forum – remarks of Herb Lin - “Herb Lin” <hlin@nas.edu>
- 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 10:55:32 +0800) - Re: SAFE forum – remarks of Herb Lin - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Lack of PGP signatures

1996-07-03 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 07:58:05 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - “David F. Ogren” <ogren@cris.com>
- 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 11:18:15 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Lack of PGP signatures

1996-07-03 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 07:14:08 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 08:05:39 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - Charles Watt <watt@sware.com>
  - 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 11:20:22 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    - 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 14:12:36 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>

Re: What remains to be done.

1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 08:24:03 +0800) - Re: What remains to be done. - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 11:29:23 +0800) - Re: What remains to be done. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-07-06 (Sat, 6 Jul 1996 19:45:49 +0800) - Re: What remains to be done. - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Philly Inquirer: More old, conterfactual “Hate on the Net” “news”

1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 13:17:47 +0800) - Philly Inquirer: More old, conterfactual “Hate on the Net” “news” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Net and Terrorism.

1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 13:35:20 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - vinnie moscaritolo <vinnie@webstuff.apple.com>
- 1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 18:46:43 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Net and Terrorism.

1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 17:41:28 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 20:40:36 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Net and Terrorism.

1996-07-05 (Sat, 6 Jul 1996 04:47:29 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-07-06 (Sat, 6 Jul 1996 08:50:48 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: CCC Crypto Lock

1996-07-06 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 06:17:56 +0800) - Re: CCC Crypto Lock - Tim Philp <tphilp@bfree.on.ca>
- 1996-07-07 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 09:42:40 +0800) - Re: CCC Crypto Lock - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-07-07 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 17:47:32 +0800) - Re: CCC Crypto Lock - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>

1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 10:36:20 +0800) - d.Comm: Your Login Information - hotlists@d-comm.com
- 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:41:58 +0800) - Re: d.Comm: Your Login Information - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Sternlight on C’punks

1996-07-16 (Wed, 17 Jul 1996 02:07:33 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-07-17 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 02:54:47 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 10:55:44 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>

Netscape download requirements

1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 23:07:30 +0800) - Netscape download requirements - “Julian Burke” <julianb@mail.tiac.net>
- 1996-07-16 (Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:21:40 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  - 1996-07-17 (Wed, 17 Jul 1996 16:04:47 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    - 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 12:28:46 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  - 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 08:41:33 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
    - 1996-07-17 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 01:51:33 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
    - 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:16:30 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
    - 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 12:31:37 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:18:53 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - janke@unixg.ubc.ca
  - 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:34:40 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
    - 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 12:35:38 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - sameer <sameer@c2.net>
- 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:49:44 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
- 1996-07-19 (Fri, 19 Jul 1996 14:54:22 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Tom Paquin <paquin@netscape.com>
  - 1996-07-19 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 00:17:23 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
  - 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 22:41:52 +0800) - Re: Netscape download requirements - Tom Paquin <paquin@netscape.com>

FTP SW to support PGP in OnNet

1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 16:28:21 +0800) - FTP SW to support PGP in OnNet - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Netscape

1996-07-19 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 05:18:47 +0800) - Netscape - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 14:21:58 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Netscape

1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 19:37:25 +0800) - Re: Netscape - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 09:20:20 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
  - 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 13:13:18 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
    - 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:41:12 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      - 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 21:59:33 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
      - 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 14:37:09 +0800) - Re: Netscape - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
    - 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 03:00:50 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 01:29:13 +0800) - Re: Netscape - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>

FTP Software Licenses Pretty Good Privacy 07/23/96

1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 05:15:39 +0800) - FTP Software Licenses Pretty Good Privacy 07/23/96 - reagle@rpcp.mit.edu (Joseph M. Reagle Jr.)
- 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 10:02:20 +0800) - Re: FTP Software Licenses Pretty Good Privacy 07/23/96 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-07-26 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:18:07 +0800) - Re: FTP Software Licenses Pretty Good Privacy 07/23/96 - Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>

Princeton University muzzles students

1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 15:57:14 +0800) - Princeton University muzzles students - declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
- 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 20:20:10 +0800) - Re: Princeton University muzzles students - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

CandleWeb V1.1 - Web client, “secure E interpreter”

1996-07-26 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:45:49 +0800) - CandleWeb V1.1 - Web client, “secure E interpreter” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Jewell is the Militia Bomber!!!!

1996-08-01 (Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:11:26 +0800) - Re: Jewell is the Militia Bomber!!!! - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-08-01 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 06:52:29 +0800) - Re: Jewell is the Militia Bomber!!!! - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Viet Nam Considered Less Harmful than Cambodia

1996-08-02 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 12:00:27 +0800) - Viet Nam Considered Less Harmful than Cambodia - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-08-02 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 20:34:13 +0800) - Re: Viet Nam Considered Less Harmful than Cambodia - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

AP story: Police look for Olympic bombing Internet link.

1996-08-03 (Sat, 3 Aug 1996 11:00:46 +0800) - AP story: Police look for Olympic bombing Internet link. - Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>
- 1996-08-03 (Sat, 3 Aug 1996 11:33:00 +0800) - Re: AP story: Police look for Olympic bombing Internet link. - Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
  - 1996-08-03 (Sat, 3 Aug 1996 14:03:48 +0800) - Re: AP story: Police look for Olympic bombing Internet link. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-08-03 (Sun, 4 Aug 1996 00:12:44 +0800) - Re: AP story: Police look for Olympic bombing Internet link. - Jonathan Corbet <corbet@stout.atd.ucar.edu>

The Hazards of Reading Naughty Newsgroups at Work

1996-08-03 (Sun, 4 Aug 1996 05:38:06 +0800) - The Hazards of Reading Naughty Newsgroups at Work - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
- 1996-08-04 (Mon, 5 Aug 1996 06:41:36 +0800) - Re: The Hazards of Reading Naughty Newsgroups at Work - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Fun with M$

1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 08:03:38 +0800) - Fun with M$ - Jeremey Barrett <jeremey@forequest.com>
- 1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 11:12:00 +0800) - Re: Fun with M$ - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: “Utilization Review”

1996-08-20 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 08:38:21 +0800) - Re: “Utilization Review” - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- 1996-08-20 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 11:53:17 +0800) - Re: “Utilization Review” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

search engine improvement

1996-08-19 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 07:39:22 +0800) - search engine improvement - bryce@digicash.com
- 1996-08-20 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 12:10:51 +0800) - Re: search engine improvement - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-08-20 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 01:05:29 +0800) - Re: search engine improvement - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
  - 1996-08-20 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 03:24:55 +0800) - Re: search engine improvement - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: [NOISE]CIA Contra Crack and LA Gangs (fwd)

1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:04:03 +0800) - Re: [NOISE]CIA Contra Crack and LA Gangs (fwd) - Jim Ray <liberty@gate.net>
- 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 18:11:44 +0800) - Re: [NOISE]CIA Contra Crack and LA Gangs (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Weird “Suppression” messages

1996-08-24 (Sat, 24 Aug 1996 18:52:47 +0800) - Weird “Suppression” messages - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
- 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 02:40:08 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 05:21:00 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Brian Durham <bdurham@metronet.com>
- 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 05:26:29 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
  - 1996-08-25 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 11:10:03 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: Weird “Suppression” messages

1996-08-25 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 09:56:36 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
- 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 07:12:59 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Password Thief for Windows 95 (fwd)

1996-10-23 (Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:28:28 -0700 (PDT)) - Password Thief for Windows 95 (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-10-23 (Wed, 23 Oct 1996 11:11:09 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Password Thief for Windows 95 (fwd) - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>

Merc: PacBell predicts imminent death of the net; film at 11

1996-10-25 (Thu, 24 Oct 1996 20:42:14 -0700 (PDT)) - Merc: PacBell predicts imminent death of the net; film at 11 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-10-27 (Sat, 26 Oct 1996 19:51:07 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Merc: PacBell predicts imminent death of the net; film at 11 - Roger Williams <roger@coelacanth.com>
  - 1996-10-27 (Sun, 27 Oct 1996 14:18:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Merc: PacBell predicts imminent death of the net; film at 11 - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Exon Countdown Clock and farewell messages

1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:51:44 -0800 (PST)) - Exon Countdown Clock and farewell messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL? [BOB DYLAN]

Unknown thread root
- 1996-11-12 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 16:51:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL? [BOB DYLAN] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  - 1996-11-12 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 21:04:04 -0800 (PST)) - Returned mail: User Unknown - Open Net Postmaster <postmaster@opennet.net.au>

BayLISA: Randal Schwartz, Just Another Convicted Perl Hacker (fwd)

1996-11-18 (Mon, 18 Nov 1996 01:00:42 -0800 (PST)) - BayLISA: Randal Schwartz, Just Another Convicted Perl Hacker (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-11-19 (Mon, 18 Nov 1996 16:57:39 -0800 (PST)) - Re: LACC: BayLISA: Randal Schwartz, Just Another Convicted Perl Hacker (fwd) - Randal Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>

From Houghton-Mifflin MIS regarding the ongoing self-mailbombing

1996-12-13 (Fri, 13 Dec 1996 13:23:00 -0800 (PST)) - From Houghton-Mifflin MIS regarding the ongoing self-mailbombing - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Army Cryptanalysis manual online

1996-12-16 (Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:32:32 -0800 (PST)) - Army Cryptanalysis manual online - Joel McNamara <joelm@eskimo.com>
- 1996-12-17 (Mon, 16 Dec 1996 16:00:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Army Cryptanalysis manual online - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1996-12-17 (Mon, 16 Dec 1996 22:34:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Army Cryptanalysis manual online - Marcus Watts <mdw@umich.edu>
  - 1996-12-18 (Tue, 17 Dec 1996 23:15:40 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Army Cryptanalysis manual online - Marcus Watts <mdw@umich.edu>

Microsoft IE may not work without censorship files

1996-12-17 (Tue, 17 Dec 1996 15:36:28 -0800 (PST)) - Microsoft IE may not work without censorship files - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

RE: Microsoft IE may not work without censorship files

1996-12-18 (Tue, 17 Dec 1996 18:55:49 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Microsoft IE may not work without censorship files - Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
- 1996-12-18 (Tue, 17 Dec 1996 19:57:02 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Microsoft IE may not work without censorship files - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: And she’s no blond…..

1997-01-14 (Mon, 13 Jan 1997 21:25:14 -0800 (PST)) - Re: And she’s no blond….. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

ANNOUNCEMNT: February 1997 Cypherpunks Bay Area Meeting

1997-02-05 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 13:23:47 -0800 (PST)) - ANNOUNCEMNT: February 1997 Cypherpunks Bay Area Meeting - Hugh Daniel <hugh@west.toad.com>
- 1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 01:48:18 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ANNOUNCEMNT: February 1997 Cypherpunks Bay Area Meeting - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: ANNOUNCEMNT: February 1997 Cypherpunks Bay Area Meeting

1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 07:11:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ANNOUNCEMNT: February 1997 Cypherpunks Bay Area Meeting - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

PATHS: Internet Taxation (Wednesday May 7, 4:15 pm) (fwd)

1997-04-28 (Mon, 28 Apr 1997 00:52:42 -0700 (PDT)) - PATHS: Internet Taxation (Wednesday May 7, 4:15 pm) (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1997-04-28 (Mon, 28 Apr 1997 01:30:01 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: PATHS: Internet Taxation (Wednesday May 7, 4:15 pm) (fwd) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>

referers and W3 (fwd)

1997-05-18 (Sun, 18 May 1997 14:59:30 +0800) - referers and W3 (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1997-05-18 (Mon, 19 May 1997 07:55:22 +0800) - Re: referers and W3 (fwd) - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
  - 1997-05-19 (Mon, 19 May 1997 08:26:31 +0800) - Re: referers and W3 (fwd) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: dhp.com is blocked by CyberSitter

1997-05-18 (Sun, 18 May 1997 16:49:39 +0800) - Re: dhp.com is blocked by CyberSitter - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Thoughtcrime (Re: My War)

1997-06-10 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 18:07:32 +0800) - Re: Thoughtcrime (Re: My War) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it.

1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 08:12:11 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:58:35 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>

Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly

1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 08:34:34 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it,

1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 08:36:34 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question

1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 12:08:10 +0800) - Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
- 1997-06-16 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 03:06:37 +0800) - Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  - 1997-06-16 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 06:44:38 +0800) - Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1997-06-16 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 04:46:59 +0800) - Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1997-06-16 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 04:51:05 +0800) - Avoid loud warnings–it only attracts disruptors - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  - 1997-06-16 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 05:06:46 +0800) - Re: Avoid loud warnings–it only attracts disruptors - Alan <alano@teleport.com>
  - 1997-06-16 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 06:25:33 +0800) - Re: Avoid loud warnings–it only attracts disruptors - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>

Re: Spam Libs (Frauenfelder on HotWired)

1997-06-15 (Mon, 16 Jun 1997 04:59:50 +0800) - Re: Spam Libs (Frauenfelder on HotWired) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

EAR cookbook anyone?

1997-06-27 (Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:55:06 +0800) - EAR cookbook anyone? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

cryptoanarchy.wiki

Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu> (403 posts)

Threads

Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole

Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)

Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)

Voicemail Security

WinNews Special Issue (fwd)

Pointer to article on ex parte search & sezure

E-mail Spy

Re: Mandatory ID in California?

Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG

Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare

censored? corrected

Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas

Clinton Administration Plans 1.5 MILLION WIRETAPS

Re: FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas

Re: Telephone switch capacity -Reply

800_ape

Re: using PGP only for digital signatures

Credentials Without Identity

Re: [NOISE] Re: 800_ape [FUQ Win95 List]

DejaNews all over again–a URL for Usenet Searching (fwd)

Re: lp ?

hacker’s dream

ANNOUNCE: Curve Encrypt 2.2

Spammers’ Email List Obtained!!!

“Junk E-Mail”

Re: “Junk Email”

Are there enough FBI agents to handle Digital Telephony?????

Code to brute-force PGP passphrase?

break microsoft!!!

Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)

Windows95 “Security”

Cracked: WINDOWS.PWL

Re: another fbi prosecution

Microsoft Internet Announcements Thursday, December 7, 1995

ERA_sur

Cyberia-L Archive [was Re: ERA_sur]

Press Release on Response to Microsoft Internet Announcements

Re: FW: websurfer 4.6

Re: Micro$oft and Java

Re: The Elevator Problem

Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus

EXON

And the standard continues to lower…

Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers

Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?

Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy

Re: .PWL spin

(Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b

Update on Microsoft .PWL and SMB Spin Control

(fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer)

ANNOUNCE: Windows 95 .PWL Security “Functionality Enhancement”

Re: “Microsoft.com” added to my KILL file

Re: Jan 13 Mountain View CA meeting

Re: Microsoft has a way to go on E-Mail

Re: NSA says strong crypto to China?

RE: “trust management” vs. “certified identity”

[Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]

NSA Rigs Win NT to B

Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references)

Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bitlong, with references)

Is this true…

When they came for the Jews…

Re: [NOISE] Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security

Re: (none)

Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com

Boston talk on offshore banks

Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from luzskru@cpcnet.com

Microsoft’s papers on NT C2 thang

A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)

Offshore Banks and Asset Protection

[noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite

Re: [noise] The economics of super-stars - partial cite

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

Re: COMMUNITY CONNEXION REFUSES TO CENSOR INTERNET SERVICES

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

Eggs at Customs (fwd)

exposure=deterence?