1996-01-20 - Re: “whom T. C. May has killfiled”

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d13d59d2fa5fb4cdc11694bf9610d48211d305178f1d22b26352d23ee9dac9a2
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960119195341.468X-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <ad25a2a70202100433dd@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-20 20:41:21 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 04:41:21 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 04:41:21 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "whom T. C. May has killfiled"
In-Reply-To: <ad25a2a70202100433dd@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960119195341.468X-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 19 Jan 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

> At 11:09 PM 1/19/96, Rich Graves wrote:
> 
> >T. C. May has killfiled.
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> ???
> 
> Mind explaining this reference? In public, preferably, as the charge was
> made here.
> 
> If it's a joke, I don't get it.

I just spent several minutes on a longer response, but on second thought I
think it suffices to say publicly that this was a particularly elliptical
joke, not at Tim's expense, that I retract and apologize for. And I've
received other mail that suggests that my primary assumption was wrong
anyway, about which I'm happy. 

I hadn't meant to post that paragraph publicly anyway, since it was a
stupid bluff. Oops. I've verified that it didn't go the other places I'd
sent a version of the article. 

And now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

-rich





Thread