1995-11-03 - Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight]

Header Data

From: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Message Hash: 8806cdf15e27ab54c7fd8f1e9aee57901d6de05ad26ac19a865443522d0c17b6
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951103114116.20782B-100000@ima.net>
Reply To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951102013958.18049A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-03 04:13:39 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 12:13:39 +0800

Raw message

From: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 12:13:39 +0800
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: censored? corrected [Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951102013958.18049A-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951103114116.20782B-100000@ima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 2 Nov 1995, Rich Graves wrote:

> > 
> >    In Hong Kong, the Internet wasn't quite strangled, but the British
> > authorities who control that colony managed to throttle free electronic
> > speech with the rest of the world until everything was bottlenecked into
> > a few little-known satellite links.
> 
> Hmm, few specifics here. I wonder if they would care to elaborate. Nah.

Don't waste your time with that idiot, he doesn't know what he's talking
about. The 1-week partial black-out here in Hong Kong happened because some
providers had ignored some licencing requirements, and has been quickly
solved once they agreed to comply.







Thread