From: Lisa Pease <lpease@netcom.com>
To: ssalgaller@CCGATE.HAC.COM
Message Hash: edf1f60c9d71324f997c9b9ed1410b3e5b45d7da75e13afcdda0780f2685d38c
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9604171551.A25609-0100000@netcom14>
Reply To: <9603178297.AA829776269@CCGATE.HAC.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-18 03:44:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 11:44:34 +0800
From: Lisa Pease <lpease@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 11:44:34 +0800
To: ssalgaller@CCGATE.HAC.COM
Subject: Re: Oklahoma City - One Year Later - The Coverup Continues !
In-Reply-To: <9603178297.AA829776269@CCGATE.HAC.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9604171551.A25609-0100000@netcom14>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
And don't forget, if you haven't already - to read Rappoport's interview
with an ex-juror from the OKC Bombing case, on my website (url below.)
Lisa Pease
====================================================================
One person, one vote.
Not one dollar, one vote.
End private government. Ban corporate donations.
Check out the Real History Archives http://www.webcom.com/lpease
Read Contemporary Real History at http://www.webcom.com/ctka
On Wed, 17 Apr 1996 ssalgaller@CCGATE.HAC.COM wrote:
> Suggested Reading:
>
> Oklahoma City - The Suppressed Truth
> By Jon Rappoport
> Blue Ocean Press
> 2633 Lincoln Blvd., Suite #256
> Santa Monica, CA 90405
> (213) 243-9005
> copyright 1995
> $12 (post paid)
>
> At 9:02 AM on April 19, 1995, the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma
> City
> was damaged in an explosion that also left 168 dead and 600 injured.
> If you
> look closer at this case, as investigative reporter Jon Rappoport has,
> you
> start asking some questions about the "official' story:
>
> The damage was supposedly caused when thousands of pounds of a fuel
> oil and
> fertilizer mixture was ignited in a truck parked near the building.
> Talk
> about "oil and water never mixing". This mixture would have to be
> either
> stirred or mixed just before use. It would also have to be detonated
> without
> any air spaces, such as the gaps between the fuel drums, in order to
> work.
>
> Even if the mixture detonated, it should leave traces of oil. none was
> found.
>
> Even if it detonated perfectly, the explosion was 3 times too weak to
> damage
> the building's reinforced concrete support columns.
>
> Especially column "B3". This column was sheared off at the 3rd floor
> level.
> Only a shaped charge placed directly on the column at that level would
> be
> able to cause this to happen. That section of the column was cut out
> and
> removed as evidence. Will we ever see it again at the trial ?
>
> Local seismometers noted *two* explosions, 10 seconds apart. This was
> "explained away" as reflections of the explosion by underlying rock
> strata.
> Ask a geologist if this sort of time delay has ever been observed
> before you
> decide if someone is "underlying".
>
> What ever happened to "John Doe #2", seen with Tim Mc Veigh that
> morning ?
>
> What happened to John Doe's #3 and #4, seen leaving the area soon
> after the
> explosion?
>
> Speaking of Tim, why (if the official story is true) did he advise the
> officer who stopped him that he had a concealed weapon ? Supposedly,
> he just
> killed 168 people, including 19 children. What's one more if it means
> he
> could get away ?
>
> And what about Terry Nichols ?
> He was advocating killing Federal employees at a public meeting in
> Estes, CO
> a year before the bombing. The FBI is very efficient, yet no one seems
> to
> have paid any attention to Terry to prevent loss of life.
>
> What about the reported financial links to the bombing, not from right
> wing
> causes, but from the Brittish Government ?
>
> Finally, what happens if and when the truth comes out in open court at
> Tim
> and Terry's trial ? One could guess that the real suppressed story
> will be
> one more casualty of the bombing.
>
> Unless we demand that someone explains column "B3".
>
> It *can* happen here - and it *did* a year ago !
>
> Book "review" by
> Stephen S.
> salgaller@aol.com
>
>
Return to April 1996
Return to “ssalgaller@CCGATE.HAC.COM”