1995-10-04 - Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
To: henrysa@microsoft.com
Message Hash: c54468dbfbf1a842fd0cdb9602faa6f95059210efbcbdda7e21c71303d4d2117
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951004165820.19409L-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-04 23:58:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: henrysa@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951004165820.19409L-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 02:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
To: Ken Simler <krs2@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)

I don't really know, I'm just passing on news... maybe talk to these folks.

-rich

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 95 19:56:38 PDT
From: Tom Czarnik <czarnik@netmanage.com>
To: Rich Graves <llurch@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole 


On Thu, 28 Sep 1995 18:31:07 -0800  Rich Graves 
>Can you demonstrate that this is true? I'll give you an account on
>my box. I've received several notes and flames that the problem 
>either never existed (which I know is untrue) or was fixed at a 
>specified (often specified different) patch level.

We can do it your way or if you are physically located at Stanford,
you can schedule an appointment to come by NetManage. We are located
in Cupertino, right off 280 at DeAnza Blvd.

The choice is yours.





Thread