From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message Hash: bda7fce5e143f81c2bd04240c89045c47d181d0e7b4c0322148ece9d08beb257
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206131338.22081G@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960206132917.8103C-100000@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-06 22:10:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:10:54 +0800
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:10:54 +0800
To: zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: The OCAF's White Paper on Internet Pornography
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960206132917.8103C-100000@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206131338.22081G@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 6 Feb 1996, zinc wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> regarding this paper; it's sent out by an autoresponder. is it illegal
> to make excessive use of the autoresponder? this would be a type of
> denial of service attack.
>
> i'm wondering if i set up a cron job to request a copy every 5 or 10
> minutes and just send it to /dev/nul, could i get in more trouble than
> say, someone just telling me to cut it out?
Regardless of the legal merits, this would be called "being an asshole."
The guy who runs mailback.com is just another common carrier.
- -rich
http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~llurch/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMRfFJI3DXUbM57SdAQFXwQQAn1IQKS6uU2MVWZbePCG1D19lmVKfBzry
L9rxdcEXCoHDpSlyqdIiv7b2SJ2PzRj8aB9p2sA1F8lyaiO4xj+21YJE/RBQ6vi7
J/VwcO6ZCvJ8Wqq6SHU+HqeuCRqV2SR/WWZtdryZGRCOeT2zVeawOlu9qxMygcgF
bsWXUea2A/k=
=/aC3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to February 1996
Return to “zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>”