cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-02-06 - Yes, I’m an idiot Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: zinc <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 6204ecee804112e350084d9926292e6a12157233d6a7e60deab4f6581eefbf8b
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206133006.22081I-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206131909.22081H-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-06 22:25:53 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:25:53 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:25:53 +0800
To: zinc <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Yes, I'm an idiot Re: The OCAF's White Paper on Internet Pornography
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206131909.22081H-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206133006.22081I-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I'd thought that this was a "friendly" site that had been hacked. It's 
not. But the comments are pretty funny regardless.

-rich

On Tue, 6 Feb 1996, Rich Graves wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Feb 1996, zinc wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > 
> > regarding this paper;  it's sent out by an autoresponder.  is it illegal 
> > to make excessive use of the autoresponder?  this would be a type of 
> > denial of service attack.
> > 
> > i'm wondering if i set up a cron job to request a copy every 5 or 10 
> > minutes and just send it to /dev/nul, could i get in more trouble than 
> > say, someone just telling me to cut it out?
> 
> This would be bad, but
> 
> TAKE A LOOK AT THE DOCUMENT RIGHT NOW!!! The fun starts about a page down.
> 
>  http://www.bway.net/~dfenton/noporn.html
> 
> Whoever "DWF" is deserves a medal.
> 
> -rich

Thread