1996-02-06 - Re: The OCAF’s White Paper on Internet Pornography

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message Hash: 41c767eaf10f4f150e94e6cbedcdf0ca54f9ace779fce32d4ce1d5dc5c8f8118
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206131909.22081H-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960206132917.8103C-100000@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-06 22:17:56 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:17:56 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 06:17:56 +0800
To: zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: The OCAF's White Paper on Internet Pornography
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960206132917.8103C-100000@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960206131909.22081H-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 6 Feb 1996, zinc wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> regarding this paper;  it's sent out by an autoresponder.  is it illegal 
> to make excessive use of the autoresponder?  this would be a type of 
> denial of service attack.
> 
> i'm wondering if i set up a cron job to request a copy every 5 or 10 
> minutes and just send it to /dev/nul, could i get in more trouble than 
> say, someone just telling me to cut it out?

This would be bad, but

TAKE A LOOK AT THE DOCUMENT RIGHT NOW!!! The fun starts about a page down.

 http://www.bway.net/~dfenton/noporn.html

Whoever "DWF" is deserves a medal.

-rich





Thread