1996-04-30 - Re: code vs cypher

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 136fcf8e5e5bbf29d32dd26959cd0f163fe62c0cb83ac0ecf3454f5c24b78cbb
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960429104732.17234C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <3184D638.188C00D4@cs.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-30 04:57:06 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 12:57:06 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 12:57:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: code vs cypher
In-Reply-To: <3184D638.188C00D4@cs.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960429104732.17234C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 29 Apr 1996, Raph Levien wrote:

> jamesd@echeque.com (Robespierre) wrote:
> >
> > At 10:01 PM 4/28/96 -0700, Rich Graves wrote:
> > > I do not recall defending any statist policies. I did not defend the
> > > [SMC call to silence Nazis], and indeed to defend the
> > > [SMC ] would not have been
> > > egregious statism, or indeed any kind of statism at all,
> >
> > I do not recall anyone accusing you of statism on the SMC call to cut
> > Nazi net access -- probably because I deleted all that tedious crap,
> > not because nobody accused you.
> 
> [blah blah blah deleted]
> 
>    I just wanted to point out that, for those who had any remaining
> doubt, the evolution of this thread demonstrates quite well the need for
> a separate coderpunks list.

I quite agree, as I said in the part of the message that James snipped. 
I'm learning a lot lurking on coderpunks. I'm also learning a lot on
alt.revisionism and talk.politics.libertarian. I'm glad we have all of
those. 

-rich






Thread