From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 12:42:26 +0800
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Futplex makes the news!
In-Reply-To: <ad3810aa1e021004cc23@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960202193609.20243c-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 2 Feb 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

> At 2:28 AM 2/3/96, Mike Duvos wrote:
> >On 2 Feb 1996 19:02:29 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >Before poo-pooing Tim, declaring victory, and returning home, it
> >should be noted that German prosecutors today added AOL to the list of
> >entities they wish to charge with "inciting hatred."
> >...
> >Time will tell whether we have won this war, or have simply
> >encountered a lull after the first onslought by the enemy.
> 
> Meaning no disrespect to any of my colleagues here, but is there now some
> sense that "we won"?
> 
> I don't see it this way. And the Germans don't seem to think they lost.

That's what they thought in 1945, too. I'd really hate to have to nuke
them from orbit. I maintain (I hope a little more coherently now) that
widely publicized subversion is far more effective than a frontal assault.
Who holds up the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as great victories
against tyranny? 
 
> Maybe I'm not seeing the Boston-area papers, and their spin on things, but
> it doesn't seem to me that an anti-censorship interpretation is getting a
> lot of press. What I am sensing is just the opposite, that a bunch of
> babykilling Nazis bent on taking over the Internet just had their main
> Propaganda Center at UMass shut down by the forces of light. This is the
> spin on the story I'm sensing.

I think this sense is wrong.

Yesterday's "Modem Driver" column in the San Jose Mercury News was poorly 
researched, but had the right spin. It mentions that the operator of 
webcom.com is the grandson of a Holocaust victim, so he gets the Mom & 
Apple Pie vote.

 http://www.sjmercury.com/living/daveplot/modem084.htm

Front page of the Stanford Daily, which generated calls from the San Jose 
Merc and the Chronicle of Higher Edication, which are likely to get the 
story right:

 http://www-Daily.stanford.edu/2-2-96/NEWS/index.html

[No, I am *not* happy to get all the credit there]

AP story in Boston Globe (long and ludicrous on-line URL, and OK, so this 
is not the greatest story, but I think it's somewhat positive):

 http://www.boston.com/globe/ap/cgi-bin/retrieve?%2Fglobe%2Fapwir%2F033%2Freg%2Fag052102

Web Review (good, even though he totally misrepresented what I'd said 
without even bothering to try to reach me):

 http://www.gnn.com/gnn/wr/96/02/01/news/ndn/zundel.html
 http://www.gnn.com/gnn/wr/current/news/ndn/telcom.html

The News & Observer (also never bothered to contact me before stating 
what I believed):

 http://www2.nando.net/newsroom/ntn/info/020296/info2_20579.html

> (Hate to say it, but the nuances of free speech are lost on most people. To
> most of them, putting Holocaust denial information on a site is ipso facto
> proof of genocidal racism.

I think it is, if (and only if) you agree with it.

> I wouldn't be surprised to see the various
> groups at UMass foaming at the mouth next week in the campus newspaper to
> get the "notorious racist" Lewis McCarthy sanctioned or thrown out.

I certainly would.

> Here's to hoping Rich's site remains up.

I've shut off access and challenged Zundel to get his many friends to run
their own damn mirrors. They could, you know -- at least one of them has a
T1. But I will put the files back (on c2.org and/or netcom and/or AOL
accounts, because it's just not ethical for me to involve Stanford in
this) if Deutsche Telekom continues to block access to webcom.com after,
say, next Wednesday. 

If they're not back up by, say Monday, I'll post an ultimatum to the 
above effect.

Netcom has hosted several notorious hate groups for years. There's no way 
in hell they'd buckle, and they're big enough to matter. Probably bigger 
than Stanford and CMU combined, though without quite the same symbolic 
power.

- -rich

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMRLgRI3DXUbM57SdAQHDDwP/XI0VJKQ9mELfCFeo/HLxqfanO4Xw1xcu
bXPiao91PCSKYJIfOM0Xku90bQB2rdVgbFLqX1fxbUu3cHi8pmq9ZRtV8rWgLcvR
WpMnmslOZjTmoIjUL5llRmQbPhUWhYithCQuP1EXsoZ/mo8ngQyW0AfGPvYWyGpe
dK3Zn0YohvQ=
=2k0/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----