1995-10-26 - Re: Mandatory ID in California?

Header Data

From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
To: alanh@infi.net (Alan Horowitz)
Message Hash: d9edd203706e8cd54b8194d42f5e83f6b37c93870f29d43b8a8402f9821f26e5
Message ID: <199510260643.AA26567@junkers.lochard.com.au>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.951025152409.3136C-100000@larry.infi.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-26 08:34:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 16:34:02 +0800

Raw message

From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 16:34:02 +0800
To: alanh@infi.net (Alan Horowitz)
Subject: Re: Mandatory ID in California?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.951025152409.3136C-100000@larry.infi.net>
Message-ID: <199510260643.AA26567@junkers.lochard.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


>"States may not authorize arrest...for failing to produce identification..."
>       Kolender v. Lawson 461 U.S. 352 (1983)
>
>"...may not compel an answer and they must allow the person to leave 
>after a reasonable brief period of time...."  - - ibid

How about INS coming into the equation?  Do they have additional powers which
let them put your butt in a bad imitation of a farday cage?

Mark
mark@lochard.com.au

Thread

• Return to October 1995

• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
• Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
• Return to “Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>”

• Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”

• 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 09:20:01 PDT) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 13:54:51 PDT) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    • 1995-10-26 (Thu, 26 Oct 1995 16:34:02 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
      • 1995-10-26 (Thu, 26 Oct 1995 17:31:40 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      • 1995-10-27 (Fri, 27 Oct 1995 12:11:24 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>