1995-10-27 - Re: Mandatory ID in California?

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
Message Hash: 6170e59d2bbc2141eeddf0be2946971a09ae40f87443dcd12ff9ead876f35781
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.951026234915.15329H-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <199510260643.AA26567@junkers.lochard.com.au>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-27 04:11:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 12:11:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 12:11:24 +0800
To: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
Subject: Re: Mandatory ID in California?
In-Reply-To: <199510260643.AA26567@junkers.lochard.com.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.951026234915.15329H-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> How about INS coming into the equation?  Do they have additional powers which
> let them put your butt in a bad imitation of a farday cage?

   It is well-settled, that the area around the borders is "special" with 
respect to immigration-related enforcement.

Thread

• Return to October 1995

• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
• Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
• Return to “Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>”

• Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”

• 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 09:20:01 PDT) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1995-10-25 (Wed, 25 Oct 95 13:54:51 PDT) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    • 1995-10-26 (Thu, 26 Oct 1995 16:34:02 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
      • 1995-10-26 (Thu, 26 Oct 1995 17:31:40 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      • 1995-10-27 (Fri, 27 Oct 1995 12:11:24 +0800) - Re: Mandatory ID in California? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>