1996-02-03 - Re: Futplex makes the news!

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: declan+@CMU.EDU
Message Hash: dd0199cd6dca591714e261d7a00d6100ae2c6e81e8799870223e9897fd3443b8
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960202160907.20243N-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <ad37cb251902100476f7@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-03 15:41:28 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 23:41:28 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 23:41:28 +0800
To: declan+@CMU.EDU
Subject: Re: Futplex makes the news!
In-Reply-To: <ad37cb251902100476f7@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960202160907.20243N-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I originally sent Tim private mail saying "you're wrong."

On the other hand, reading futplex's actual statement and the fact that
Germany continues to "investigate" CompuServe and AOL, maybe he's right... 

This is not the end, but it may be the end of the beginning.

I also think there's a place for premature ejaculations of victory, 
because they tend to become self-fulfilling prophecies. If the press says 
that Germany is successfully censoring Zundel, then that sets a 
precedent; but if the press says that Germany's limp attempts to censor 
somebody on the Internet were a total failure, then they'll just look 
like a bunch of goofballs pursuing a lost cause. 

-rich





Thread