From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c93ab43a6d0c43a5e887cee4a3b0b691a9685b2c23e55d5f5f46d15b0c6f2eab
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960424095109.19618B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199604241316.JAA09448@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-24 21:41:45 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: GIV_way
In-Reply-To: <199604241316.JAA09448@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960424095109.19618B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, John Young wrote:
> 4-24-96: "US prosecutor attacks bank secrecy laws."
>
> A US federal prosecutor yesterday told banks that they
> are no better than prostitutes if they transmit money
> without knowing their customers or the purpose of the
> transaction.
I agree with this completely. I'm sure that I disagree with said US
prosecutor on the criminalization of sexual entrepreneurship (tm), though,
so our agreement is meaningless.
-rich
Return to April 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”