From: mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 28587f1f9575a66fa20bec581d25c6f73704480885f6e8f2508f124dc43d4f47
Message ID: <199603272017.MAA09654@fionn.lbl.gov>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-28 07:55:03 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 15:55:03 +0800
From: mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 15:55:03 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages
Message-ID: <199603272017.MAA09654@fionn.lbl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mar 27, 3:13am, Timothy C. May wrote:
> Americans are typically thousands of miles away from those speaking
> Japanese, Mandarin, Tagalog, Polish, Italian, Dutch, Spanish, Hindi,
> Talegu, and the hundreds of other languages. It is not at all clear what
> language Americans should pick as a "second language" to study.
I don't really disagree with the conclusions drawn by this poster, or
with the quasi-economics argument he makes. However, I must say that
the above is completely wrong. MOST Americans live in large urban
areas, & as such are within seconds/footsteps of people whose native
languages are not English (or who don't have a single "native language",
but several!). There are probably _hundreds_ of languages spoken in the
San Francisco Bay Area. The school districts here routinely report double
digit languages in the school age population.
There are 3 Spanish language channels (& another 2 ... "multiple
choice") on my tv cable system. That anglophones choose to tune them
out, or to not even notice the Noah's ark around them, says something
about this culture.
Return to March 1996
Return to “Syed Yusuf <yusuf921@uidaho.edu>”