1996-07-03 - Re: Lack of PGP signatures

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: “David F. Ogren” <ogren@cris.com>
Message Hash: a139c0d80862b268df13dfb9df4ea9ced7c5b2b076c36d2601272d6fc4173c45
Message ID: <199607030142.VAA29584@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199607022343.TAA21050@darius.cris.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-03 05:23:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:23:54 +0800

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:23:54 +0800
To: "David F. Ogren" <ogren@cris.com>
Subject: Re: Lack of PGP signatures
In-Reply-To: <199607022343.TAA21050@darius.cris.com>
Message-ID: <199607030142.VAA29584@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I've noticed recently that two PGP programmers (Mr. Zimmerman and Mr. 
> Atkins) do not seem to PGP clearsign their messages to this list. In fact, 
> a surprisingly small percentage of messages on the C-punk list are signed. 
> This despite the fact that the average subscriber is at least literate in 
> PGP.

Actually, I don't PGP sign my messages because 95% of the time my
connection to my mail host (the machine on which I read and respond to
mail) is insecure.  Composing the message, bringing the message to my
local machine, running PGP, re-uploading the message, and sending it
is a big deal and I don't consider it important enough for my everyday
posts.

When I send out notices that I consider important I do sign them.  But
that is fairly rare (at the moment).

Basically, I refuse to type my passphrase over the net, which signing
all my messages (this one included) would require.

-derek





Thread