From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: “David F. Ogren” <ogren@cris.com>
Message Hash: a139c0d80862b268df13dfb9df4ea9ced7c5b2b076c36d2601272d6fc4173c45
Message ID: <199607030142.VAA29584@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199607022343.TAA21050@darius.cris.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-03 05:23:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:23:54 +0800
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:23:54 +0800
To: "David F. Ogren" <ogren@cris.com>
Subject: Re: Lack of PGP signatures
In-Reply-To: <199607022343.TAA21050@darius.cris.com>
Message-ID: <199607030142.VAA29584@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I've noticed recently that two PGP programmers (Mr. Zimmerman and Mr.
> Atkins) do not seem to PGP clearsign their messages to this list. In fact,
> a surprisingly small percentage of messages on the C-punk list are signed.
> This despite the fact that the average subscriber is at least literate in
> PGP.
Actually, I don't PGP sign my messages because 95% of the time my
connection to my mail host (the machine on which I read and respond to
mail) is insecure. Composing the message, bringing the message to my
local machine, running PGP, re-uploading the message, and sending it
is a big deal and I don't consider it important enough for my everyday
posts.
When I send out notices that I consider important I do sign them. But
that is fairly rare (at the moment).
Basically, I refuse to type my passphrase over the net, which signing
all my messages (this one included) would require.
-derek
Return to July 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”