1996-01-30 - Re: [FACTS] Germany, or “Oh no not again”

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: “Dr. Dimitri Vulis” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 387ec5a4aa7704758a1c95ecc78f29edc3c88de3f3b854ce19ead1ccdb7f5b9f
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960129203729.7421E-100000@crl10.crl.com>
Reply To: <1mwHiD103w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-30 06:49:18 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 14:49:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 14:49:18 +0800
To: "Dr. Dimitri Vulis" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: [FACTS] Germany, or "Oh no not again"
In-Reply-To: <1mwHiD103w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960129203729.7421E-100000@crl10.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Mon, 29 Jan 1996, Dr. Dimitri Vulis wrote:

> Isn't there something in U.S. Code about crossing state lines
> for immoral purposes?

No relevance here.  Originally enacted to combat the "white 
slavery" trade, it was probably used more to prosecute unmarried
lovers for sexual activity outside of marriage.  I don't even
know if it's still on the books, but as I said, no relevance in
the current debate.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~








Thread