From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Message Hash: 87bb34f10a47461afb54ffa6c952714c7d62d5f098d8949eefa16f5d6dcd7fa6
Message ID: <199604111722.NAA02646@universe.digex.net>
Reply To: <JZX7LD7w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-12 10:22:35 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:22:35 +0800
From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:22:35 +0800
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Subject: Re: questions about bits and bytes
In-Reply-To: <JZX7LD7w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <199604111722.NAA02646@universe.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Dr. Dimitri Vulis writes:
>I used to hack a CDC Cyber box designed by Seymour Cray before he started his
>oen company. It had the following curious features:
>
>1 word = 10 _bytes_ = 60 bits
>1 _byte_ = 6 bits
. . .
>I believe BESM-6 also had 6-bit bytes. I have the dox for it someplace
>(in Russian) but can't find them offhand.
>
>Moral: it's not necessarily redundant to say '8-bit byte'.
Which is precisely the reason the IETF always refers to "bytes" as
"octets". "Octet" is defined to be eight bits, regardless of local
word sizes.
Return to April 1996
Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”