1996-04-12 - Re: questions about bits and bytes

Header Data

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Message Hash: 87bb34f10a47461afb54ffa6c952714c7d62d5f098d8949eefa16f5d6dcd7fa6
Message ID: <199604111722.NAA02646@universe.digex.net>
Reply To: <JZX7LD7w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-12 10:22:35 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:22:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:22:35 +0800
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Subject: Re: questions about bits and bytes
In-Reply-To: <JZX7LD7w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <199604111722.NAA02646@universe.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Dr. Dimitri Vulis writes:
>I used to hack a CDC Cyber box designed by Seymour Cray before he started his
>oen company. It had the following curious features:
>
>1 word = 10 _bytes_ = 60 bits
>1 _byte_ = 6 bits

. . .

>I believe BESM-6 also had 6-bit bytes. I have the dox for it someplace
>(in Russian) but can't find them offhand.
>
>Moral: it's not necessarily redundant to say '8-bit byte'.

Which is precisely the reason the IETF always refers to "bytes" as
"octets".  "Octet" is defined to be eight bits, regardless of local
word sizes.





Thread