jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> (1118 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?

• 1995-12-07 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 20:19:17 PST) - Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?

• 1995-12-07 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 21:36:55 PST) - Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?

• 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 12:03:32 PST) - Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol

• 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 14:05:32 PST) - Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: More FUD from First Virtual

• 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 09:50:28 PST) - Re: More FUD from First Virtual - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 11:59:19 PST) - Re: More FUD from First Virtual - Jon Cooper <jcooper@virtu.sar.usf.edu>
  • 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 06:59:42 PST) - Re: More FUD from First Virtual - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>

Re: More FUD from First Virtual

• 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 12:07:32 PST) - Re: More FUD from First Virtual - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-09 (Sat, 9 Dec 95 13:48:12 PST) - Re: More FUD from First Virtual - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
  • 1995-12-10 (Sun, 10 Dec 95 05:58:01 PST) - Re: More FUD from First Virtual - Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>

Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3

• 1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 14:13:08 +0800) - Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Blinding against Kocher’s timing attacks

• 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 08:16:31 +0800) - Re: Blinding against Kocher’s timing attacks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3

• 1995-12-16 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 15:49:51 +0800) - Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:49:46 +0800) - Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3 - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3

• 1995-12-16 (Sun, 17 Dec 1995 05:19:38 +0800) - Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Netscape announces position against GAK

• 1995-12-16 (Sun, 17 Dec 1995 05:50:59 +0800) - Re: Netscape announces position against GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Political Cleanup program

• 1995-12-17 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 03:55:57 +0800) - Political Cleanup program - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:34:03 +0800) - Re: Political Cleanup program - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
  • 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 13:20:06 +0800) - Re: Political Cleanup program - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: Political Cleanup program

• 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 13:07:44 +0800) - Re: Political Cleanup program - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-18 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 05:03:22 +0800) - Re: Political Cleanup program - hallam@w3.org
  • 1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 12:58:49 +0800) - Re: Political Cleanup program - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: Political Cleanup program

• 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 13:26:14 +0800) - Re: Political Cleanup program - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Campaign Finance Reform

• 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:44:30 +0800) - Re: Campaign Finance Reform - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 19:02:53 +0800) - Re: Campaign Finance Reform - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
    • 1995-12-18 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:19:25 +0800) - Re: Campaign Finance Reform - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: Political Cleanup program

• 1995-12-18 (Mon, 18 Dec 1995 17:08:48 +0800) - Re: Political Cleanup program - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Campaign Finance Reform

• 1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:19:02 +0800) - Re: Campaign Finance Reform - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-18 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 07:21:58 +0800) - Re: Campaign Finance Reform - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

RE: Political Cleanup program

• 1995-12-19 (Tue, 19 Dec 1995 16:12:02 +0800) - RE: Political Cleanup program - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: cyphernomicon FTP site?

• 1995-12-20 (Tue, 19 Dec 95 22:00:54 PST) - Re: cyphernomicon FTP site? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-20 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 01:01:24 PST) - Re: cyphernomicon FTP site? - bart@netcom.com (Harry Bartholomew)

Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE]

• 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 10:52:58 PST) - Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-22 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 17:50:02 PST) - Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE] - Light Ray <fricke@mae.engr.ucdavis.edu>

Re: Newsweek Nerd 50

• 1995-12-22 (Sat, 23 Dec 1995 07:15:58 +0800) - Re: Newsweek Nerd 50 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ex encrypted script

• 1995-12-22 (Sat, 23 Dec 1995 07:16:17 +0800) - Re: ex encrypted script - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-23 (Sat, 23 Dec 1995 21:49:46 +0800) - Encrypted script - sort of - Laszlo Vecsey <master@internexus.net>
    • 1995-12-28 (Thu, 28 Dec 1995 20:48:00 +0800) - Re: Encrypted script - sort of - mark@ausnetinfo.com.au (Mark)

Re: ex encrypted script

• 1995-12-22 (Sat, 23 Dec 1995 07:38:20 +0800) - Re: ex encrypted script - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FH radios

• 1995-12-27 (Wed, 27 Dec 1995 14:05:55 +0800) - Re: FH radios - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1995-12-26 (Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:14:29 +0800) - Re: FH radios - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Re: [Rant] Flame threads and factual accuracy

• 1995-12-27 (Wed, 27 Dec 1995 14:11:05 +0800) - Re: [Rant] Flame threads and factual accuracy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

“Deterrence”

• 1995-12-30 (Sat, 30 Dec 1995 12:02:58 +0800) - “Deterrence” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: last straw

• 1995-12-30 (Sun, 31 Dec 1995 04:27:34 +0800) - Re: last straw - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)

• 1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 12:00:33 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-03 (Tue, 2 Jan 96 17:40:48 PST) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - Peter Monta <pmonta@qualcomm.com>
    • 1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 10:22:22 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)

• 1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 18:28:06 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)

• 1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 20:11:08 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 15:19:59 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)

• 1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 21:09:15 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 00:12:07 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers [NOISE] - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>

Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)

• 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 01:40:52 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 18:40:51 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - Andrew Meredith <meredith@ecid.cig.mot.com>

Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)

• 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 02:17:37 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Windows Eudora and PGP

• 1996-01-03 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 07:07:10 +0800) - Re: Windows Eudora and PGP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Guerilla ISPs

• 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 13:23:15 +0800) - Re: Guerilla ISPs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP

• 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 13:23:33 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-04 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 03:59:00 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - James Black <black@eng.usf.edu>

Re: “Deterrence”

• 1996-01-04 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 02:12:56 +0800) - Re: “Deterrence” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-04 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 05:30:17 +0800) - Hammill 1987 speech - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
  • 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 16:46:47 +0800) - Re: “Deterrence” - Jack Hammer <jh@teleport.com>

Re: Answer: Windows Eudora and PGP

• 1996-01-04 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 03:52:33 +0800) - Re: Answer: Windows Eudora and PGP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP

• 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 08:53:47 +0800) - Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Representations of Pi, etc.

• 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 13:28:46 +0800) - Representations of Pi, etc. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)

• 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:03:49 +0800) - Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

testing WPGP

• 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 23:13:36 +0800) - testing WPGP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Representations of Pi, etc.

• 1996-01-05 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 05:13:17 +0800) - Re: Representations of Pi, etc. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Pi Stuff

• 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 14:23:23 +0800) - Re: Pi Stuff - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-06 (Sat, 6 Jan 1996 13:52:36 +0800) - Re: Pi Stuff - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)

Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy?

• 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 13:36:01 +0800) - Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Domains, InterNIC, and PGP (and physical locations of hosts, to boot)

• 1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 15:17:15 +0800) - Re: Domains, InterNIC, and PGP (and physical locations of hosts, to boot) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: phone calls from hell

• 1996-01-07 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 03:54:47 +0800) - Re: phone calls from hell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 12:12:49 +0800) - Re: phone calls from hell - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
  • 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 03:20:44 +0800) - Re: phone calls from hell - Sten Drescher <stend@cris.com>

Re: Hammill 1987 speech

• 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 13:36:17 +0800) - Re: Hammill 1987 speech - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:21:08 +0800) - Re: Hammill 1987 speech - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
    • 1996-01-08 (Mon, 8 Jan 1996 16:36:43 +0800) - Re: DNow2 Re: Hammill 1987 speech - Evan Ravitz <evan@darkstar.cygnus.com>
    • 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 01:40:29 +0800) - Re: DNow2 Re: Hammill 1987 speech - Evan Ravitz <evan@darkstar.cygnus.com>
      • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 14:30:56 +0800) - Re: DNow2 Re: Hammill 1987 speech - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
        • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 02:45:39 +0800) - Re: DNow2> Re: DNow2 Re: Hammill 1987 speech - Evan Ravitz <evan@darkstar.cygnus.com>

Re: e$ payee anonymity (Was: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it!)

• 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 07:26:35 +0800) - Re: e$ payee anonymity (Was: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it!) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: phone calls from hell

• 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:00:51 +0800) - Re: phone calls from hell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NWLibs Re: Hammill 1987 speech

• 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 17:46:11 +0800) - Re: NWLibs Re: Hammill 1987 speech - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: E-cash and Interest

• 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 09:20:27 PST) - Re: E-cash and Interest - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 02:19:06 +0800) - Re: E-cash and Interest - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>

Re: Is this true…

• 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 14:43:16 PST) - Re: Is this true… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Domains, InterNIC, and PGP (and physical locations of hosts, to boot)

• 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 17:04:21 +0800) - Re: Domains, InterNIC, and PGP (and physical locations of hosts, to boot) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: News Release

• 1996-01-13 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 14:59:48 PST) - Re: News Release - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

• 1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 23:50:58 PST) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 19:08:34 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

• 1996-01-14 (Mon, 15 Jan 1996 07:45:08 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-15 (Mon, 15 Jan 1996 08:25:43 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

• 1996-01-15 (Mon, 15 Jan 1996 10:18:32 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-15 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 05:04:21 PST) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>

Re: Phil Z getting through customs

• 1996-01-16 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 16:20:20 PST) - Re: Phil Z getting through customs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Phil Z getting through customs

• 1996-01-16 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 18:31:18 PST) - Re: Phil Z getting through customs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 22:16:15 +0800) - Re: Phil Z getting through customs - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

PGP for CP/M?

• 1996-01-16 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 18:34:07 PST) - PGP for CP/M? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 22:11:43 +0800) - Re: PGP for CP/M? - ue@alpha.c2.org (Unseen Entity)

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

• 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 16:52:09 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 17:01:50 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Spiderspace

• 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 21:17:55 +0800) - Re: Spiderspace - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Lotus to export 64 bit, partially-escrowed Notes

• 1996-01-17 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 07:42:18 +0800) - Re: Lotus to export 64 bit, partially-escrowed Notes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-18 (Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:25:37 +0800) - Re: Lotus to export 64 bit, partially-escrowed Notes - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>

Re: Microsoft’s CAPI

• 1996-01-19 (Fri, 19 Jan 1996 11:58:33 +0800) - Re: Microsoft’s CAPI - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Wipe Swap File

• 1996-01-21 (Sun, 21 Jan 1996 12:47:46 +0800) - Re: Wipe Swap File - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

• 1996-01-21 (Sun, 21 Jan 1996 14:15:14 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Wipe Swap File

• 1996-01-21 (Sun, 21 Jan 1996 21:28:00 +0800) - Re: Wipe Swap File - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Wipe Swap File

• 1996-01-22 (Sun, 21 Jan 96 19:57:51 PST) - Re: Wipe Swap File - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:37:59 +0800) - Re: Wipe Swap File - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: Wipe Swap File

• 1996-01-22 (Sun, 21 Jan 96 20:53:20 PST) - Re: Wipe Swap File - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NSA vacuuming down Internet traffic

• 1996-01-23 (Mon, 22 Jan 96 17:01:56 PST) - Re: NSA vacuuming down Internet traffic - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-23 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 05:27:58 +0800) - Re: NSA vacuuming down Internet traffic - Rick Smith <smith@sctc.com>

Re: Ultimate Paranoia

• 1996-01-23 (Mon, 22 Jan 96 19:43:10 PST) - Re: Ultimate Paranoia - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Collapse of Ideas in a Pop Culture

• 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 12:26:54 +0800) - Re: The Collapse of Ideas in a Pop Culture - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NSA vacuuming down Internet traffic

• 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:21:24 +0800) - Re: NSA vacuuming down Internet traffic - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [noise!] (fwd) Re: FYA/I: Who’d have gaussed it?

• 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:34:26 +0800) - Re: [noise!] (fwd) Re: FYA/I: Who’d have gaussed it? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

re: [local] Report on Portland Cpunks meeting

• 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:42:47 +0800) - re: [local] Report on Portland Cpunks meeting - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Philip Zimmermann and the Press

• 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 21:00:08 +0800) - Re: Philip Zimmermann and the Press - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)

• 1996-01-25 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 12:31:48 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:42:08 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:55:19 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
    • 1996-01-24 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 00:27:16 +0800) - Zimmermann Telegram (crypto history) - cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
      • 1996-01-24 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 01:18:30 +0800) - Re: Zimmermann Telegram (crypto history) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1996-01-25 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 05:03:16 +0800) - Re: Zimmermann Telegram (crypto history) - hallam@w3.org
  • 1996-01-25 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 05:30:27 +0800) - Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!) - hallam@w3.org

Re: Signing nyms’ keys (Was: Report on Portland Cpunks…)

• 1996-01-25 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 17:27:00 +0800) - Re: Signing nyms’ keys (Was: Report on Portland Cpunks…) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: German home banking (fromn RISKS)

• 1996-01-25 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 17:29:54 +0800) - Re: German home banking (fromn RISKS) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 15:32:14 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 01:34:05 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Asgaard <asgaard@sos.sll.se>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 18:53:44 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 18:57:11 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Crypto Exports, Europe, and Conspiracy Theories

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 08:04:43 +0800) - Re: Crypto Exports, Europe, and Conspiracy Theories - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Denning’s Crypto Archy

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 08:19:52 +0800) - Re: Denning’s Crypto Archy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 08:29:29 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 08:35:34 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bernie S. Sentencing

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 09:00:41 +0800) - Re: Bernie S. Sentencing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

re: Assassination Politics

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 09:15:56 +0800) - re: Assassination Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking)

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 09:54:19 +0800) - Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:20:56 +0800) - Re: Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking) - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:22:10 +0800) - Re: Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking) - Chris Townsend <townsend@smokin.fly.net>
    • 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:51:05 +0800) - Re: Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:26:06 +0800) - Re: Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking) - “Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:15:22 +0800) - NOISE NOISE NOISE - clocks and other irrelevance - “Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>

Re: Crypto Exports, Europe, and Conspiracy Theories

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:05:57 +0800) - Re: Crypto Exports, Europe, and Conspiracy Theories - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 13:07:08 +0800) - Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:17:02 +0800) - Re: Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Denning’s misleading statements

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:10:11 +0800) - Re: Denning’s misleading statements - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 17:27:13 +0800) - Re: Denning’s misleading statements - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>

Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:30:53 +0800) - Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 02:44:10 +0800) - Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: NOISE NOISE NOISE - clocks and other irrelevance

• 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 19:40:34 +0800) - Re: NOISE NOISE NOISE - clocks and other irrelevance - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RANT: When hi-tech is a hinderance (freedom w/in limits)

• 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 11:05:39 +0800) - Re: RANT: When hi-tech is a hinderance (freedom w/in limits) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: NWLibs> Re: Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics

• 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 02:08:51 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: NWLibs> Re: Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 07:12:23 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: NWLibs> Re: Anonymous trashing of Assassination Politics - Jack Hammer <jh@teleport.com>

Re: Doctor Denning

• 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 02:42:10 +0800) - Re: Doctor Denning - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 03:40:23 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 03:42:06 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-28 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 03:39:07 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 10:07:38 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    • 1996-01-28 (Sun, 28 Jan 1996 23:50:13 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - awestrop@crl.com (Alan Westrope)

Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks

• 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 01:56:30 +0800) - Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 06:19:07 +0800) - Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>

Re: Over-reacting?

• 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 02:36:23 +0800) - Re: Over-reacting? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PAC_man

• 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:06:52 +0800) - Re: PAC_man - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Over-reacting?

• 1996-01-29 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:17:46 +0800) - Over-reacting? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Here’s how you put your key on the keyservers…

• 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 09:12:43 +0800) - Re: Here’s how you put your key on the keyservers… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail”

• 1996-01-30 (Tue, 30 Jan 1996 10:41:19 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip

• 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 19:54:37 +0800) - Re: [rant] A thought on filters and the V-Chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Crypto-smart-card startup Inside Technologies

• 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:47:36 +0800) - Re: Crypto-smart-card startup Inside Technologies - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 14:07:59 +0800) - Re: Crypto-smart-card startup Inside Technologies - Peter Monta <pmonta@qualcomm.com>

Re: Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking)

• 1996-02-01 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 22:27:27 +0800) - Re: Time codes for PCs (fromn German Banking) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Crypto-smart-card startup Inside Technologies

• 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 04:59:38 +0800) - Re: Crypto-smart-card startup Inside Technologies - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 05:02:06 +0800) - Re: Crypto-smart-card startup Inside Technologies - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan appearing on “Europe’s Most Wanted”

• 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 11:10:39 +0800) - Re: Tim’s paranoid rant about Declan appearing on “Europe’s Most Wanted” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RC2 Source Code - Legal Warning from RSADSI

• 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:08:34 +0800) - Re: RC2 Source Code - Legal Warning from RSADSI - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings

• 1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:20:10 +0800) - Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 02:20:59 +0800) - Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings - Paul Kanz <paul@icx.com>

Re: THIS IS NOT NUKEPUNKS Re: Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em

• 1996-02-03 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 01:09:43 +0800) - Re: THIS IS NOT NUKEPUNKS Re: Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [noise] Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings

• 1996-02-04 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 10:59:32 +0800) - Re: [noise] Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Our “New Order”

• 1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 11:23:28 +0800) - Re: Our “New Order” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [noise] Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings

• 1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 21:17:28 +0800) - Re: [noise] Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: verification of randomness

• 1996-02-05 (Tue, 6 Feb 1996 00:17:20 +0800) - Re: verification of randomness - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Arthur C. Clarke Supports Strong Crypto

• 1996-02-06 (Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:08:35 +0800) - Re: Arthur C. Clarke Supports Strong Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Jim Bell - Murderous Terrorist

• 1996-02-06 (Tue, 6 Feb 1996 20:37:20 +0800) - Re: Jim Bell - Murderous Terrorist - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [noise] Re: Crippled Notes export encryption

• 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 05:21:53 +0800) - Re: [noise] Re: Crippled Notes export encryption - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why am I wrong?

• 1996-02-07 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 15:08:05 +0800) - Re: Why am I wrong? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Anti-US-censorship ammunition

• 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:00:51 +0800) - Re: Anti-US-censorship ammunition - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong?

• 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:39:54 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Ooops! Sincerest apologies.

• 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:44:56 +0800) - Ooops! Sincerest apologies. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

• 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 11:06:56 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:28:34 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: Assassination Politics–isn’t it gambling?

• 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:25:19 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics–isn’t it gambling? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 23:13:44 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics–isn’t it gambling? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
  • 1996-02-10 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:16:14 +0800) - Hey, didn’t he used to be…? - Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>

Re: Electronic Grille Cipher?

• 1996-02-08 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:41:20 +0800) - Re: Electronic Grille Cipher? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assassination Politics–isn’t it gambling?

• 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:00:04 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics–isn’t it gambling? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

• 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:12:23 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:09:52 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:45:14 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
      • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 04:14:25 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 04:04:32 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
          • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 04:39:57 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
          • 1996-02-09 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 12:06:23 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
          • 1996-02-10 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:10:03 +0800) - In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry’s Mail Filter” <perry@piermont.com>
            • 1996-02-09 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 10:54:42 +0800) - Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
              • 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 19:38:51 +0800) - Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
                • 1996-02-10 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 23:29:30 +0800) - Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

• 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 11:08:33 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

• 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 15:24:50 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 16:48:11 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
  • 1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 22:25:54 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: Choices

• 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 17:36:57 +0800) - Re: Choices - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 18:25:14 +0800) - Re: Choices - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

• 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 17:38:55 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

• 1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:00:52 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Emotional Killer (or out of the frying pan and into the electric chair?)

• 1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 17:05:12 +0800) - Re: The Emotional Killer (or out of the frying pan and into the electric chair?) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

• 1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 17:21:16 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Regulation of citizen-alien communications

• 1996-02-12 (Tue, 13 Feb 1996 04:45:52 +0800) - Re: Regulation of citizen-alien communications - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Portland, OR, Key-Signing+

• 1996-02-13 (Tue, 13 Feb 1996 18:44:48 +0800) - Re: Portland, OR, Key-Signing+ - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets

• 1996-02-13 (Tue, 13 Feb 96 12:02:26 PST) - Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:

• 1996-02-14 (Wed, 14 Feb 1996 12:57:42 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets

• 1996-02-14 (Tue, 13 Feb 96 21:42:09 PST) - Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assasination Politics

• 1996-02-14 (Tue, 13 Feb 96 22:33:20 PST) - Re: Assasination Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: MS CryptoAPI (fwd)

• 1996-02-14 (Tue, 13 Feb 96 22:33:28 PST) - Re: MS CryptoAPI (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:

• 1996-02-14 (Wed, 14 Feb 1996 15:44:08 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets

• 1996-02-14 (Wed, 14 Feb 1996 15:50:43 +0800) - Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assasination Politics

• 1996-02-14 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 01:19:30 +0800) - Re: Assasination Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: fortune and predictions…

• 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:40:42 +0800) - Re: fortune and predictions… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [ASSASSINATION NOISE] Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets

• 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:42:03 +0800) - Re: [ASSASSINATION NOISE] Re: V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Emotional Killer (or out of the frying pan and into

• 1996-02-15 (Fri, 16 Feb 1996 07:50:07 +0800) - Re: The Emotional Killer (or out of the frying pan and into - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:

• 1996-02-16 (Fri, 16 Feb 1996 16:56:15 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assassination Politics(tm) was V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets

• 1996-02-16 (Fri, 16 Feb 1996 17:09:47 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics(tm) was V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Cypherpunks Decency Act

• 1996-02-16 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 04:30:26 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks Decency Act - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer…

• 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 11:35:08 +0800) - Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 12:54:56 +0800) - Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer… - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
  • 1996-02-17 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 04:35:09 +0800) - Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer… - Sean Gabb <cea01sig@gold.ac.uk>

Re: CDA Yes Votes; Collection

• 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 14:51:36 +0800) - Re: CDA Yes Votes; Collection - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 23:24:30 +0800) - Re: CDA Yes Votes; Collection - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
    • 1996-02-17 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 00:05:21 +0800) - Re: CDA Yes Votes; Collection - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe.

• 1996-02-17 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 03:04:22 +0800) - Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-18 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 09:36:15 +0800) - Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe. - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe.

• 1996-02-18 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 14:28:59 +0800) - Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-18 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 14:37:43 +0800) - Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe. - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Re: Science News - article on Quantum Crypto

• 1996-02-18 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 06:36:40 +0800) - Re: Science News - article on Quantum Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Using lasers to communicate

• 1996-02-19 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 08:35:42 +0800) - Re: Using lasers to communicate - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Science News - article on Quantum Crypto

• 1996-02-19 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 09:16:38 +0800) - Re: Science News - article on Quantum Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:

• 1996-02-19 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:21:49 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe.

• 1996-02-19 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:56:21 +0800) - Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Easy Nuclear Detonator

• 1996-02-19 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 14:28:05 +0800) - Easy Nuclear Detonator - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-19 (Tue, 20 Feb 1996 03:19:31 +0800) - Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
  • 1996-02-22 (Wed, 21 Feb 96 19:57:59 PST) - Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator

• 1996-02-20 (Tue, 20 Feb 1996 09:55:00 +0800) - Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-20 (Tue, 20 Feb 1996 13:24:28 +0800) - Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
    • 1996-02-22 (Wed, 21 Feb 96 20:02:03 PST) - Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Optical repeaters

• 1996-02-20 (Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:17:01 +0800) - Re: Optical repeaters - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Optical repeaters

• 1996-02-21 (Wed, 21 Feb 1996 08:45:55 +0800) - Re: Optical repeaters - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)

• 1996-02-21 (Wed, 21 Feb 1996 12:07:43 +0800) - Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator

• 1996-02-22 (Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:24:03 PST) - Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-23 (Fri, 23 Feb 1996 21:04:36 +0800) - [Off topic] Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator

• 1996-02-22 (Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:50:07 PST) - Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-22 (Fri, 23 Feb 1996 04:30:26 +0800) - NOISE Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)

Assassination Poltics 8: Asahi article

• 1996-02-22 (Thu, 22 Feb 96 00:28:16 PST) - Assassination Poltics 8: Asahi article - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: TIS–Building in Big Brother for a Better Tommorrow

• 1996-02-24 (Sun, 25 Feb 1996 06:56:21 +0800) - Re: TIS–Building in Big Brother for a Better Tommorrow - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-24 (Sun, 25 Feb 1996 03:48:04 +0800) - Re: TIS–Building in Big Brother for a Better Tommorrow - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Re: [Off topic] Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator

• 1996-02-24 (Sun, 25 Feb 1996 07:36:52 +0800) - Re: [Off topic] Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-24 (Sun, 25 Feb 1996 05:15:10 +0800) - Re: [Off topic] Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Ass. Politics

• 1996-02-27 (Tue, 27 Feb 1996 11:43:31 +0800) - Re: Ass. Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: TIS–Building in Big Brother for a Better Tommorrow

• 1996-02-27 (Tue, 27 Feb 1996 11:43:41 +0800) - Re: TIS–Building in Big Brother for a Better Tommorrow - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: E$? Whatever

• 1996-02-28 (Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20:32:06 +0800) - Re: E$? Whatever - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Assassination Politics 10

• 1996-02-29 (Thu, 29 Feb 1996 18:43:50 +0800) - Assassination Politics 10 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Assassination Politics 9!

• 1996-02-29 (Thu, 29 Feb 1996 18:48:46 +0800) - Assassination Politics 9! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-02 (Sun, 3 Mar 1996 04:34:36 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics 9! - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-03-02 (Sun, 3 Mar 1996 04:42:42 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics 9! - Just Rich <rich@c2.org>

Re: (Fwd) Gov’t run anon servers

• 1996-03-05 (Tue, 5 Mar 1996 08:33:57 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) Gov’t run anon servers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 13:05:37 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) Gov’t run anon servers - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu

Re: (INFO) Leahy/Goodlatte introduce crypto bill

• 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 08:57:57 +0800) - Re: (INFO) Leahy/Goodlatte introduce crypto bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assassination Politics 9!

• 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 20:00:19 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics 9! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Another Motivation for the CDA

• 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 1996 10:33:05 +0800) - Re: Another Motivation for the CDA - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Whut it sez

• 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 1996 13:45:08 +0800) - Re: Whut it sez - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Leahy bill nightmare scenario?

• 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 1996 16:53:46 +0800) - Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 16:40:49 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - djw@vplus.com (Dan Weinstein)

Re: Lawz to be.

• 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 1996 23:45:15 +0800) - Re: Lawz to be. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill

• 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 96 12:03:55 PST) - Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill

• 1996-03-07 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 04:50:33 +0800) - Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bidzos on CNBC, discussing Leahy’s Bill

• 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 08:30:30 +0800) - Re: Bidzos on CNBC, discussing Leahy’s Bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assassination Politics 9!

• 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 13:05:39 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics 9! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill

• 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 13:24:28 +0800) - Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario?

• 1996-03-08 (Sat, 9 Mar 1996 03:24:21 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Quotations

• 1996-03-08 (Sat, 9 Mar 1996 03:43:27 +0800) - Re: Quotations - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assassination Politics(tm) was V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets

• 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 02:37:53 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics(tm) was V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (INFO) Leahy/Goodlatte introduce crypto bill

• 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 03:27:15 +0800) - Re: (INFO) Leahy/Goodlatte introduce crypto bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario?

• 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 03:56:18 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assasination Politics

• 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 04:50:03 +0800) - Re: Assasination Politics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assassination Politics(tm) was V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets

• 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 06:46:10 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics(tm) was V-chips, CC, and Motorcycle Helmets - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Leahy’s guillotine.

• 1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 11:08:12 +0800) - Leahy’s guillotine. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 08:16:33 +0800) - Re: Leahy’s guillotine. - Chris Townsend <townsend@smokin.fly.net>

Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario?

• 1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 13:25:29 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: rhetorical trickery

• 1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 14:07:41 +0800) - Re: rhetorical trickery - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Leahy’s guillotine.

• 1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 14:37:55 +0800) - Re: Leahy’s guillotine. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill

• 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 00:19:44 +0800) - Re: Anonymous remailers and Leahy bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Explosives, Criminality, and Preemptive Action

• 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 04:11:28 +0800) - Re: Explosives, Criminality, and Preemptive Action - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Lawz to be.

• 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 04:18:11 +0800) - Re: Lawz to be. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 08:40:22 +0800) - Re: Lawz to be. - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
    • 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 09:55:17 +0800) - Re: Lawz to be. - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>

Re: Leahy’s guillotine.

• 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 04:18:25 +0800) - Re: Leahy’s guillotine. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Lawz to be.

• 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 14:40:32 +0800) - Re: Lawz to be. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk?

• 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:07:34 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario?

• 1996-03-11 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 02:53:56 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bell, Detweiler, Ravings, and Whatnot

• 1996-03-11 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:26:27 +0800) - Re: Bell, Detweiler, Ravings, and Whatnot - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-11 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:04:21 +0800) - Re: Bell, Detweiler, Ravings, and Whatnot - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>

Re: Bell, Detweiler, Ravings, and Whatnot

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 09:33:29 +0800) - Re: Bell, Detweiler, Ravings, and Whatnot - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 22:36:56 +0800) - Re: Bell, Detweiler, Ravings, and Whatnot - Jeff Davis <eagle@armory.com>

Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio?

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 13:18:33 +0800) - Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario?

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 13:44:10 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-14 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:03:17 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: A lengthy preliminary analysis of the Leahy bill.

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 14:40:42 +0800) - Re: A lengthy preliminary analysis of the Leahy bill. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Do you feel lucky, punk?

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 20:18:52 +0800) - Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:29:32 +0800) - [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Leahy Bill a Move to Slow Crypto Exports as Much as Possible

• 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 01:15:33 +0800) - Re: Leahy Bill a Move to Slow Crypto Exports as Much as Possible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Cryptographers practicing law?

• 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 01:25:01 +0800) - Cryptographers practicing law? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Leahy and Mrs. Bemmis (now that’s a subject line)

• 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 01:25:58 +0800) - Re: Leahy and Mrs. Bemmis (now that’s a subject line) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 17:47:02 +0800) - Re: Leahy and Mrs. Bemmis (now that’s a subject line) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: What about PGP? (was Re: Leahy Bill a Move to Slow Crypto Exports as Much as Possible)

• 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 06:14:16 +0800) - Re: What about PGP? (was Re: Leahy Bill a Move to Slow Crypto Exports as Much as Possible) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario?

• 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 06:20:29 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-13 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 07:54:59 +0800) - Re: Leahy bill nightmare scenario? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio?

• 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:52:49 +0800) - Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio?

• 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 10:13:36 +0800) - Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Do you feel lucky, punk?

• 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:52:36 +0800) - Do you feel lucky, punk? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 14:52:45 +0800) - Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: How’s that again?

• 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:20:16 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 16:07:11 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
    • 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 15:53:45 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
    • 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 16:26:41 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Do you feel lucky, punk?

• 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 16:12:13 +0800) - Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 01:25:46 +0800) - [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:28:24 +0800) - Re: [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

How’s that again?

• 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:09:29 +0800) - How’s that again? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:21:50 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  • 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 22:08:01 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-03-14 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 11:37:54 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Re: [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk?

• 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 22:48:07 +0800) - Re: [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM

• 1996-03-13 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 07:17:03 +0800) - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: How’s that again?

• 1996-03-14 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 09:21:54 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-15 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:36:11 -0500) - [Noise] Jim Bell: Legal Reformer - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Beat Remote Monitor Snooping?

• 1996-03-15 (Fri, 15 Mar 1996 11:33:56 +0800) - Re: Beat Remote Monitor Snooping? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:LACC: PC Phones Home?

• 1996-03-15 (Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:10:21 +0800) - Re:LACC: PC Phones Home? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto

• 1996-03-15 (Thu, 14 Mar 96 20:23:57 PST) - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto

• 1996-03-15 (Thu, 14 Mar 96 21:16:32 PST) - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RICO and remailers (brief treatment, if long)

• 1996-03-15 (Thu, 14 Mar 96 21:21:05 PST) - Re: RICO and remailers (brief treatment, if long) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-16 (Sat, 16 Mar 1996 18:11:37 +0800) - [Noise] Re: RICO and remailers - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-03-16 (Sat, 16 Mar 1996 18:12:08 +0800) - Re: RICO and remailers (brief treatment, if long) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto

• 1996-03-15 (Fri, 15 Mar 1996 13:56:25 +0800) - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto

• 1996-03-16 (Sat, 16 Mar 1996 19:37:47 +0800) - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Leahy bill, legalize crypto

• 1996-03-16 (Sun, 17 Mar 1996 01:26:59 +0800) - RE: Leahy bill, legalize crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto

• 1996-03-16 (Sun, 17 Mar 1996 01:27:06 +0800) - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Beat Remote Monitor Snooping?

• 1996-03-17 (Sun, 17 Mar 1996 17:15:03 +0800) - Re: Beat Remote Monitor Snooping? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-16 (Sat, 16 Mar 1996 18:52:41 +0800) - [NOISE] NTSC color encoding - lull@acm.org (John Lull)

Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers

• 1996-03-17 (Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:57:06 +0800) - Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-17 (Sun, 17 Mar 1996 17:29:28 +0800) - Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-03-17 (Sun, 17 Mar 1996 23:17:11 +0800) - Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers - winn@Infowar.Com
    • 1996-03-19 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 03:22:41 +0800) - Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers - Mark Aldrich <maldrich@grctechs.va.grci.com>

Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers

• 1996-03-17 (Mon, 18 Mar 1996 01:56:45 +0800) - Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers

• 1996-03-19 (Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:49:29 +0800) - Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill

• 1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 18:23:49 +0800) - Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:

• 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 23:43:09 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 20:55:59 +0800) - Leahy Bill: Conspiracy, or Predictable Legislation? - dirsec <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill

• 1996-03-22 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 04:20:23 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 21:08:35 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill - dirsec <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Ecash API about to be released

• 1996-03-22 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 05:34:26 +0800) - Re: Ecash API about to be released - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Ecash API about to be released

• 1996-03-23 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 15:22:07 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Ecash API about to be released - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: DAZ_zle

• 1996-03-24 (Sun, 24 Mar 1996 12:34:49 +0800) - Re: DAZ_zle - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS

• 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 07:47:54 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 11:07:19 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 22:12:52 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 03:35:12 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Bad news from Judge Richey

• 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 15:05:57 +0800) - Re: Bad news from Judge Richey - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bad news from Judge Richey

• 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 17:27:49 +0800) - Re: Bad news from Judge Richey - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 20:54:32 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:35:43 +0800) - National speed limits and expansion of federal power… - deven@ties.org (Deven T. Corzine)

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame)

• 1996-03-27 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:12:40 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-27 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 07:12:04 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 09:37:57 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bad news from Judge Richey

• 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 09:39:15 +0800) - Re: Bad news from Judge Richey - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: New crypto bill to be introduced

• 1996-03-29 (Fri, 29 Mar 1996 16:20:29 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-29 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 06:27:14 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-29 (Fri, 29 Mar 1996 23:14:09 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-29 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 04:08:16 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 15:46:25 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 12:51:38 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 17:42:20 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 14:20:33 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 20:38:40 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 14:52:49 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 19:12:31 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 15:34:26 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 15:02:28 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: New crypto bill to be introduced

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 17:19:28 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 04:18:09 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
    • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 10:58:28 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Anonymous Cpunk Bashing

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 20:04:20 +0800) - Re: Anonymous Cpunk Bashing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban on PGP)

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 20:51:54 +0800) - Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban on PGP) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 19:37:27 +0800) - Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP) - Dave Del Torto <ddt@lsd.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 23:21:27 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 01:05:01 +0800) - The limits of my patience. - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 06:39:03 +0800) - Re: The limits of my patience. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
      • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:02:55 +0800) - Re: The limits of my patience. - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:22:46 +0800) - Re: The limits of my patience. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: The limits of my patience.

• 1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 07:25:19 +0800) - Re: The limits of my patience. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: New crypto bill to be introduced

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 08:54:01 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:02:11 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: Note: Problems Confronting the Asset Concealer [Part 1 of 2 of Volume I]

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 11:54:33 +0800) - Re: Note: Problems Confronting the Asset Concealer [Part 1 of 2 of Volume I] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 08:07:39 +0800) - Re: Note: Problems Confronting the Asset Concealer [Part 1 of 2 of Volume I] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 13:25:54 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:02:36 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: The limits of my patience. (suggested solution)

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 15:00:31 +0800) - Re: The limits of my patience. (suggested solution) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:01:39 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:01:46 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 14:47:51 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP)

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:01:57 +0800) - Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The limits of my patience.

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:02:25 +0800) - Re: The limits of my patience. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 21:20:28 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:12:51 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: [NOISE] Cable-TV-Piracy-Punks

• 1996-03-31 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 03:31:28 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Cable-TV-Piracy-Punks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

So where’s the Burns bill?

• 1996-03-31 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 07:02:41 +0800) - So where’s the Burns bill? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SNI_ffs

• 1996-04-01 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 08:50:24 +0800) - Re: SNI_ffs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP)

• 1996-04-01 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 15:07:12 +0800) - Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 16:11:01 +0800) - Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Witch Hunts

• 1996-04-01 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 20:13:49 +0800) - Re: Witch Hunts - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] Nasty-Quibble-Punks

• 1996-04-01 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 23:41:11 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Nasty-Quibble-Punks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-01 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 00:20:43 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Nasty-Quibble-Punks - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)

Re: NYT on CFP

• 1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 16:40:07 +0800) - Re: NYT on CFP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 14:23:30 +0800) - J Bell’s Moniker (WAS: Re: NYT on CFP) - Mark Aldrich <maldrich@grctechs.va.grci.com>

Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP)

• 1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 20:27:47 +0800) - Re: Electronic locksmiths are watching you (Belgium’s ban onPGP) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Crypto

• 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 16:33:04 +0800) - Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: J Bell’s Moniker (WAS: Re: NYT on CFP)

• 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 16:35:42 +0800) - Re: J Bell’s Moniker (WAS: Re: NYT on CFP) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Test case for RSA t-shirts

• 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 17:07:49 +0800) - Re: Test case for RSA t-shirts - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Witch Hunts

• 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 18:03:17 +0800) - Re: Witch Hunts - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 12:13:17 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 20:30:32 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 10:35:45 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - sameer@c2.org
      • 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 11:34:06 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        • 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 16:45:21 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - sameer@c2.org

Re: Bad news from Judge Richey

• 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 08:44:02 +0800) - Re: Bad news from Judge Richey - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 18:41:37 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 20:02:53 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - sameer@c2.org

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 18:49:33 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-06 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 06:31:57 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 21:46:26 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 15:59:29 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Cryp

• 1996-04-06 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 06:18:06 +0800) - Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Cryp - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Cryp

• 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 11:01:32 +0800) - Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Cryp - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 11:54:55 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Cryp

• 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 14:05:10 +0800) - Re: ACM/IEEE Letter on Cryp - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 17:18:06 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: the cost of untracability?

• 1996-04-07 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 06:08:06 +0800) - Re: the cost of untracability? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-08 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 08:25:12 +0800) - Re: the cost of untracability? - Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>
    • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 14:28:08 +0800) - Re: the cost of untracability? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: the cost of untracability?

• 1996-04-08 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 14:31:54 +0800) - Re: the cost of untracability? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-08 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 19:54:18 +0800) - Re: the cost of untracability? - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:15:58 +0800) - Re: the cost of untracability? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-08 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 14:42:01 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:52:06 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

They’re running scared.

• 1996-04-08 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 16:45:14 +0800) - They’re running scared. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-08 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 05:42:19 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Australia’s New South Wales tries net-censorship

• 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 17:56:15 +0800) - Re: Australia’s New South Wales tries net-censorship - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 18:16:08 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work

• 1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 09:44:27 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] Federal Bureau of Indigestion

• 1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 12:59:03 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Federal Bureau of Indigestion - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 13:36:33 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 18:41:25 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Watch your language, Shabbir.

• 1996-04-10 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 01:06:50 +0800) - Watch your language, Shabbir. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 11:02:02 +0800) - Re: Watch your language, Shabbir. - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
    • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 23:10:47 +0800) - Re: Watch your language, Shabbir. - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
      • 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 01:38:51 +0800) - [long rant] Re: Watch your language, Shabbir. - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca

Re: No matter where you go, there they are.

• 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 08:28:58 +0800) - Re: No matter where you go, there they are. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 17:32:07 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 21:22:32 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - “Richard Martin” <rmartin@aw.sgi.com>
    • 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 07:37:55 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes [NOISE] - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 23:46:48 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>

Re: No matter where you go, there they are.

• 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 23:28:54 +0800) - Re: No matter where you go, there they are. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 02:46:04 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Digital Cash Escrow

• 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 11:58:03 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash Escrow - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 15:15:34 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash Escrow - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>

Re: GPS-based authentication

• 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 20:41:41 +0800) - Re: GPS-based authentication - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: GPS-based authentication

• 1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 02:55:13 +0800) - Re: GPS-based authentication - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work

• 1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 05:28:46 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 06:23:02 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 11:14:56 +0800) - Answer about bits and bytes - Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>
    • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 13:57:16 +0800) - Re: Answer about bits and bytes - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
      • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 17:13:12 +0800) - Re: Answer about bits and bytes - Dan Harmon <harmon@tenet.edu>
        • 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 05:43:26 +0800) - Re: Answer about bits and bytes - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: No matter where you go, there they are.

• 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 13:30:46 +0800) - Re: No matter where you go, there they are. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 18:14:07 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: No matter where you go, there they are.

• 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 23:13:31 +0800) - Re: No matter where you go, there they are. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:40:04 +0800) - RE: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 01:07:34 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 08:21:17 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes@Eng.Auburn.EDU>

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 02:26:37 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 03:23:27 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 02:47:52 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 02:52:47 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 09:57:04 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 17:30:44 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
    • 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 06:22:00 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:18:37 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
    • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:22:35 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
  • 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:28:27 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:45:06 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Contempt charges

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:59:50 +0800) - Re: Contempt charges - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Watch your language, Shabbir.

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:31:49 +0800) - Re: Watch your language, Shabbir. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:52:00 +0800) - Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Lotus Notes 24-bit sellout

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 16:14:50 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes 24-bit sellout - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Any examples of mandatory content rating?

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 17:17:35 +0800) - Re: Any examples of mandatory content rating? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 19:56:00 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda] Re: Any examples of mandatory content rating? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Digital Cash Escrow

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 17:24:25 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash Escrow - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Watch your language, Shabbir.

• 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 02:40:48 +0800) - Re: Watch your language, Shabbir. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 04:29:52 +0800) - [increasingly irrelevant] Re: Watch your language… - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca

Re: math patents

• 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 08:05:39 +0800) - Re: math patents - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-17 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 22:17:23 +0800) - Re: math patents - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 08:37:16 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: GPS privacy/ECM

• 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 08:02:02 +0800) - Re: GPS privacy/ECM - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-15 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 07:37:46 +0800) - Re: GPS privacy/ECM - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Re: Infrared photography

• 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 10:55:33 +0800) - Re: Infrared photography - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RSA & Sec. Dyn.

• 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:06:53 +0800) - Re: RSA & Sec. Dyn. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: What can the judge do to me?

• 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:29:01 +0800) - Re: What can the judge do to me? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:12:55 +0800) - Re: What can the judge do to me? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: What can the judge do to me?

• 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 15:04:05 +0800) - Re: What can the judge do to me? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 15:09:27 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: What can the judge do to me? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: [IRS] Elvis in Escrow

• 1996-04-16 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 04:15:26 +0800) - Re: [IRS] Elvis in Escrow - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: math patents

• 1996-04-16 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 05:49:01 +0800) - RE: math patents - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: What’s the “Human Interaction Institute” at CMU For ???

• 1996-04-17 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 03:50:54 +0800) - Re: What’s the “Human Interaction Institute” at CMU For ??? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Clinton blathering about Internet terror

• 1996-04-17 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 03:52:33 +0800) - Re: Clinton blathering about Internet terror - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: A possible problem with more regulation possible?

• 1996-04-17 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 07:47:04 +0800) - Re: A possible problem with more regulation possible? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bernstein case decisision (fwd)

• 1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 10:24:23 +0800) - Re: Bernstein case decisision (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: why compression doesn’t perfectly even out entropy

• 1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 08:49:52 +0800) - Re: why compression doesn’t perfectly even out entropy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: math patents

• 1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 13:10:59 +0800) - RE: math patents - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:

• 1996-04-20 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 12:57:51 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-20 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 18:36:20 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Baby-Food Bombing and highly selective quoting

• 1996-04-20 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 14:44:56 +0800) - Re: Baby-Food Bombing and highly selective quoting - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-20 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 02:00:38 +0800) - Wiretapping v warrants - Bruce Marshall <brucem@wichita.fn.net>

Re: Wiretapping v warrants

• 1996-04-20 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 06:36:46 +0800) - Re: Wiretapping v warrants - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-22 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 02:10:12 +0800) - Re: Wiretapping v warrants - Bruce Marshall <brucem@wichita.fn.net>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-20 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 06:44:00 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 13:51:24 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 16:00:30 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: [EVENT] cheap date w/Bob Dole

• 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 09:11:46 +0800) - Re: [EVENT] cheap date w/Bob Dole - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: OS/2 encryption utilities

• 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 12:03:12 +0800) - Re: OS/2 encryption utilities - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 12:51:55 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: OS/2 encryption utilities - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:50:51 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda] Re: OS/2 encryption utilities - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)

Re: Georgia Legislation - Remailer Effect???

• 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 12:11:46 +0800) - Re: Georgia Legislation - Remailer Effect??? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

OS/2 encryption utilities

• 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 15:20:52 +0800) - OS/2 encryption utilities - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 15:21:03 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 19:06:36 +0800) - [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: 5th protect password? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-04-21 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 03:12:53 +0800) - Re: [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: 5th protect password? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
      • 1996-04-22 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 14:55:40 +0800) - Jim Bell, Apology to list. Was: [Yadda Yadda Yadda] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:34:14 +0800) - Betting and reputations Was: Re: Jim Bell, Apology to list. Was: [Yadda Yadda Yadda] - “Jon Leonard” <jleonard@divcom.umop-ap.com>
  • 1996-04-21 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:49:33 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-21 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 05:11:44 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-22 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 09:17:36 +0800) - [getting noisy] Re: 5th protect password? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-22 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 11:23:54 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [Laffs] Citizen in need of correction

• 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 14:28:04 +0800) - Re: [Laffs] Citizen in need of correction - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 19:32:07 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 20:23:07 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-23 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 02:09:27 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:33:21 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 15:12:52 +0800) - [Wager: Seeming Resolution] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 16:48:53 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution] - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
      • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 06:50:31 -0700 (PDT)) - [An End To Noise] Wager: Permanent Resolution - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca

Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net

• 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:35:18 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - Jon Lebkowsky <jonl@well.com>

Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution]

• 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 17:35:23 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:16:18 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution] - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 23:27:40 -0700 (PDT)) - [Yadda Yadda] Poker (was Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution]) - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)

Re: crypto in .ja (fwd)

• 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 19:56:03 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: crypto in .ja (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues

• 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 07:14:43 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>

Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution]

• 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 22:13:18 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 23:46:30 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution] - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: trusting the processor chip

• 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 16:12:50 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: trusting the processor chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 19:33:50 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
    • 1996-04-26 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:24:05 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - Christian Wettergren <cwe@it.kth.se>
  • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:47:17 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
    • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 22:33:00 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>

Re: [NOISE] What is “laser material”?

• 1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 21:32:06 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] What is “laser material”? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: trusting the processor chip

• 1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 23:23:04 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:13:50 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>

Re: trusting the processor chip

• 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 11:05:56 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking

• 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 12:01:21 +0800) - Re: US law - World Law - Secret Banking - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: trusting the processor chip

• 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 10:15:26 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 09:49:31 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
    • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 22:21:58 +0800) - Re: trusting the processor chip - Christian Wettergren <cwe@it.kth.se>

“A Closer Look”

• 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 12:47:47 +0800) - “A Closer Look” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: You are now an International Arms Trafficker (#1) ???

• 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 14:09:33 +0800) - Re: You are now an International Arms Trafficker (#1) ??? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Guardian angels, the decency brigade, and cyberserap

• 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:37:50 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Guardian angels, the decency brigade, and cyberserap - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-04-28 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 07:24:21 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:25:30 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:47:02 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-04-29 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 02:18:40 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>

Re: Mindshare and Java

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:45:21 +0800) - Re: Mindshare and Java - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:02:50 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:16:58 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:57:07 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Book: The President’s Eyes Only

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:03:52 +0800) - Re: Book: The President’s Eyes Only - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor missing

• 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 09:11:16 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor missing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 16:00:45 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
    • 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 19:34:34 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 12:16:01 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor

• 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 21:54:33 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 13:31:08 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 14:38:55 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 14:55:27 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 09:57:52 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Freedom and security

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 11:45:52 +0800) - Re: Freedom and security - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [LONG] Churchill Club: 20th Anniversary PK Crypto

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 13:37:33 +0800) - Re: [LONG] Churchill Club: 20th Anniversary PK Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 13:59:49 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 13:52:57 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 13:59:28 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 16:23:03 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: Smartcards are coming to the US

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 14:25:16 +0800) - Re: Smartcards are coming to the US - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 14:32:54 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 15:37:12 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 15:59:48 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 15:42:16 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 17:12:30 +0800) - Re: Former CIA Director and Strategic Investment Editor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Freedom and security

• 1996-05-02 (Thu, 2 May 1996 10:43:36 +0800) - Re: Freedom and security - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Burns bill?

• 1996-05-02 (Thu, 2 May 1996 14:49:22 +0800) - Burns bill? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

No Subject

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 10:45:42 +0800) - No Subject - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [History] USPS tried to monopolize email? (c. 1981)

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 11:31:57 +0800) - Re: [History] USPS tried to monopolize email? (c. 1981) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.15 - Legislation Challenges Clinton’s Grip on US Crypto Policy

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 13:54:49 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.15 - Legislation Challenges Clinton’s Grip on US Crypto Policy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: EET on PGP API Quash

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 18:41:32 +0800) - Re: EET on PGP API Quash - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: proposed anti-pseudospoofing law in Georgia

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 18:56:13 +0800) - Re: proposed anti-pseudospoofing law in Georgia - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Joy of Java

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 19:26:38 +0800) - Re: The Joy of Java - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Bit tax again?

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 20:24:30 +0800) - Bit tax again? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Bit tax again?

• 1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 15:25:29 +0800) - Bit tax again? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Edited Edupage, 25 April 1996

• 1996-05-04 (Sun, 5 May 1996 04:56:07 +0800) - Re: Edited Edupage, 25 April 1996 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Bit Tax” proposed by satan@hell.gov

• 1996-05-04 (Sun, 5 May 1996 07:15:49 +0800) - Re: “Bit Tax” proposed by satan@hell.gov - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-09 (Fri, 10 May 1996 04:14:38 +0800) - Re: “Bit Tax” proposed by satan@hell.gov - Elizabeth Schwartz <betsys@cs.umb.edu>

Re: Money Laundering Conference with Government Types

• 1996-05-05 (Sun, 5 May 1996 15:35:06 +0800) - Re: Money Laundering Conference with Government Types - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-05 (Mon, 6 May 1996 05:14:19 +0800) - Re: Money Laundering Conference with Government Types - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes

• 1996-05-05 (Mon, 6 May 1996 03:58:40 +0800) - Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Money Laundering Conference with Government Types

• 1996-05-05 (Mon, 6 May 1996 07:44:13 +0800) - Re: Money Laundering Conference with Government Types - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FW: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes

• 1996-05-06 (Mon, 6 May 1996 18:38:42 +0800) - Re: FW: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 14:18:25 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: More on Internet connections

• 1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 17:20:08 +0800) - Re: More on Internet connections - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The FBI/NSA’s new escrow argument, DC crypto panel

• 1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 18:13:54 +0800) - Re: The FBI/NSA’s new escrow argument, DC crypto panel - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes

• 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 13:42:19 +0800) - Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 16:01:19 +0800) - Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes

• 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 14:08:40 +0800) - Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 14:20:42 +0800) - Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Police tactics question

• 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 14:51:33 +0800) - Re: Police tactics question - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ecash payee anonymity, cpunk archives

• 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 16:01:12 +0800) - Re: ecash payee anonymity, cpunk archives - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Leahy bill dead?

• 1996-05-09 (Thu, 9 May 1996 15:30:00 +0800) - Leahy bill dead? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Edited Edupage, 9 May 1996

• 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 14:25:45 +0800) - Re: Edited Edupage, 9 May 1996 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Again: [hrdware] anti-Tempest video settings

• 1996-05-12 (Sun, 12 May 1996 17:23:01 +0800) - Re: Again: [hrdware] anti-Tempest video settings - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Accidental subscriber needs help off of list.

• 1996-05-13 (Mon, 13 May 1996 19:34:31 +0800) - Accidental subscriber needs help off of list. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 21:19:15 +0800) - Re: Accidental subscriber needs help off of list. - Don <don@cs.byu.edu>
    • 1996-05-14 (Wed, 15 May 1996 04:08:34 +0800) - Re: Accidental subscriber needs help off of list. - “Michael H. Warfield” <mhw@wittsend.com>

Re: Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 19:14:05 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 19:45:54 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

Past one terabit/second on fiber

• 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 19:52:42 +0800) - Past one terabit/second on fiber - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 08:12:49 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - brian dodds <jyacc!aspen!bdodds@uunet.uu.net>
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 23:19:38 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>

Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 13:44:16 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 16:28:24 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 11:53:39 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - brian dodds <jyacc!aspen!bdodds@uunet.uu.net>

Re: Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 05:19:36 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 04:27:20 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - bryce@digicash.com

Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber

• 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 14:15:45 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 03:57:03 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>

Re: Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 17:17:43 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber

• 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 17:49:53 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber

• 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 17:53:08 +0800) - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 18:02:02 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Too cheap to meter”

• 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 19:20:36 +0800) - Re: “Too cheap to meter” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 20:36:58 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 00:01:46 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Senator, your public key please?

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 06:12:13 +0800) - Re: Senator, your public key please? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.19 - 27 Reps Urge President to Abandon Key-Escrow Encryption Policy

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 06:49:07 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.19 - 27 Reps Urge President to Abandon Key-Escrow Encryption Policy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 07:30:52 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Interactive Week exclusive - White House to launch “Clipper III”

• 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 13:53:44 +0800) - Re: Interactive Week exclusive - White House to launch “Clipper III” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace

• 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 14:59:38 +0800) - Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Rumor: DSS Broken?

• 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 16:07:30 +0800) - Re: Rumor: DSS Broken? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Cypherpunks, a political “newsgroup?”

• 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 17:04:03 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks, a political “newsgroup?” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Crisis with Remailers

• 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 16:48:33 +0800) - Re: The Crisis with Remailers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable?

• 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 18:22:14 +0800) - Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns (fwd)

• 1996-05-21 (Wed, 22 May 1996 06:54:34 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Rumor: DSS Broken?

• 1996-05-21 (Wed, 22 May 1996 07:05:49 +0800) - Re: Rumor: DSS Broken? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 14:35:32 +0800) - Re: Rumor: DSS Broken? - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
    • 1996-05-22 (Thu, 23 May 1996 02:23:08 +0800) - Re: Rumor: DSS Broken? - Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes@Eng.Auburn.EDU>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns

• 1996-05-21 (Wed, 22 May 1996 07:17:42 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 08:33:43 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Rumor: DSS Broken?

• 1996-05-21 (Wed, 22 May 1996 07:47:35 +0800) - Re: Rumor: DSS Broken? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: AP

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 10:01:29 +0800) - Re: AP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 11:27:58 +0800) - PROPOSAL - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-05-23 (Fri, 24 May 1996 07:50:41 +0800) - [AP] [NOISE] Re: PROPOSAL - Paul Robichaux <paul@ljl.COM>
    • 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 17:05:42 +0800) - Re: [AP] [NOISE] Re: PROPOSAL - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: Remailer extensions

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 13:12:02 +0800) - Re: Remailer extensions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Long-Lived Remailers

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 13:14:13 +0800) - Re: Long-Lived Remailers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 13:36:58 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 13:47:06 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>

Re: AP

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 13:37:32 +0800) - Re: AP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Remailers, Copyright, and Scientology

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 15:50:01 +0800) - Re: Remailers, Copyright, and Scientology - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 11:42:54 +0800) - Re: Remailers, Copyright, and Scientology - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: NIST Draft Key Escrow Paper

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 15:57:51 +0800) - Re: NIST Draft Key Escrow Paper - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 22:31:50 +0800) - Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-22 (Thu, 23 May 1996 05:34:28 +0800) - Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: Another Analysis – Re: NIST Draft Key Escrow Paper

• 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 08:10:42 +0800) - Re: Another Analysis – Re: NIST Draft Key Escrow Paper - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace

• 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 11:47:51 +0800) - Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns (fwd)

• 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 13:29:29 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: INFO: Transcript of Sen. Leahy’s RealAudio chat now available! (5/22/96)

• 1996-05-23 (Fri, 24 May 1996 06:34:45 +0800) - Re: INFO: Transcript of Sen. Leahy’s RealAudio chat now available! (5/22/96) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns

• 1996-05-23 (Fri, 24 May 1996 07:50:49 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace

• 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 08:41:39 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 09:47:16 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 12:29:36 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Innocence & harmless weapons

• 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 13:58:29 +0800) - Re: Innocence & harmless weapons - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: National Journal article sez net-activism is just political hicks

• 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 14:14:20 +0800) - Re: National Journal article sez net-activism is just political hicks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 15:35:46 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 18:37:08 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>

Re: National Journal article sez net-activism is just political hicks

• 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 17:40:52 +0800) - Re: National Journal article sez net-activism is just political hicks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Cyber-Anarchy

• 1996-05-24 (Sat, 25 May 1996 06:53:47 +0800) - Re: Cyber-Anarchy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 10:05:46 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM…

• 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 10:31:58 +0800) - Re: PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Layman’s explanation for limits on escrowed encryption …

• 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 14:37:11 +0800) - Re: Layman’s explanation for limits on escrowed encryption … - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 12:36:58 +0800) - Re: Layman’s explanation for limits on escrowed encryption … - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 16:25:46 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace

• 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 16:30:21 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) Re: TCM: mafia as a paradigm for cyberspace - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Announcing CryptaPix 1.0

• 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 16:52:16 +0800) - Re: Announcing CryptaPix 1.0 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns

• 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:33:12 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 17:21:52 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:49:58 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:28:24 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - Subir Grewal <grewals@acf2.nyu.edu>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 07:04:20 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 07:05:53 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - Subir Grewal <grewals@acf2.nyu.edu>

Re: “Key Escrow without Escrow Agents”

• 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 09:31:42 +0800) - Re: “Key Escrow without Escrow Agents” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 10:50:54 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 13:24:22 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - Subir Grewal <grewals@acf2.nyu.edu>

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 14:44:14 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 16:37:59 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - Subir Grewal <grewals@acf2.NYU.EDU>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns

• 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 17:59:53 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 17:09:21 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

FW: “Scannist” arrested

• 1996-05-27 (Tue, 28 May 1996 03:31:58 +0800) - FW: “Scannist” arrested - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Internet traffic is monitored.

• 1996-05-29 (Thu, 30 May 1996 05:31:35 +0800) - Re: Internet traffic is monitored. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Tempest Info

• 1996-05-29 (Thu, 30 May 1996 05:37:27 +0800) - Re: Tempest Info - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: TIC_hip

• 1996-05-30 (Thu, 30 May 1996 09:23:55 +0800) - Re: TIC_hip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations

• 1996-05-31 (Fri, 31 May 1996 13:38:46 +0800) - Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-01 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 11:28:01 +0800) - Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations - Jeremey Barrett <jeremey@forequest.com>

Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations

• 1996-06-01 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 08:27:07 +0800) - Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-02 (Sun, 2 Jun 1996 08:39:30 +0800) - Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations - Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>

Re: Java Crypto API questions

• 1996-06-01 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 12:48:27 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-01 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 11:44:48 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>

Re: “Anonymity is bad,” says a source who wishes to remain anonymous

• 1996-06-01 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 15:45:28 +0800) - Re: “Anonymity is bad,” says a source who wishes to remain anonymous - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews”

• 1996-06-02 (Mon, 3 Jun 1996 05:14:10 +0800) - Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-03 (Mon, 3 Jun 1996 08:23:21 +0800) - Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews” - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>

Re: Java Crypto API questions

• 1996-06-02 (Mon, 3 Jun 1996 06:06:57 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Java Crypto API questions

• 1996-06-03 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 04:56:35 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-03 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 07:21:16 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: Java Crypto API questions

• 1996-06-04 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 08:48:37 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Java Crypto API questions

• 1996-06-04 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 13:31:13 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CWD: “Jacking in from the “One that Got Away” Port

• 1996-06-04 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 18:55:41 +0800) - Re: CWD: “Jacking in from the “One that Got Away” Port - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-04 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 01:54:09 +0800) - Re: CWD: “Jacking in from the “One that Got Away” Port - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1996-06-04 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 02:51:03 +0800) - Re: CWD: “Jacking in from the “One that Got Away” Port - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: Java Crypto API questions

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 10:54:42 +0800) - Re: Java Crypto API questions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NYT on NTT/RSA Chips

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 11:12:37 +0800) - Re: NYT on NTT/RSA Chips - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 20:32:29 +0800) - Re: NYT on NTT/RSA Chips - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>

Export what’s imported

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 11:43:38 +0800) - Export what’s imported - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (VTW) BillWatch #48

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 12:05:50 +0800) - Re: (VTW) BillWatch #48 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Where are the cryptographers going to come from?

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 13:07:15 +0800) - Re: Where are the cryptographers going to come from? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: MELP: 2400 baud speech coding

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:41:20 +0800) - Re: MELP: 2400 baud speech coding - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NYT on NTT/RSA Chips

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 17:33:49 +0800) - Re: NYT on NTT/RSA Chips - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 18:01:23 +0800) - Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

• 1996-06-05 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 18:17:54 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NYT on NTT/RSA Chips

• 1996-06-06 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 10:39:25 +0800) - Re: NYT on NTT/RSA Chips - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip

• 1996-06-06 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 18:00:01 +0800) - Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: is the list active??

• 1996-06-06 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 23:37:54 +0800) - Re: is the list active?? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

• 1996-06-07 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 23:33:51 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-07 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 04:42:12 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
  • 1996-06-07 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 05:33:27 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>

Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

• 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 16:44:11 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 17:19:17 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - nelson@crynwr.com

Re: OECD on Crypto

• 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 17:52:05 +0800) - Re: OECD on Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SF Bay Area Physical Cpunks Meeting, June 8th, Stanford Turing Aud

• 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 18:52:18 +0800) - Re: SF Bay Area Physical Cpunks Meeting, June 8th, Stanford Turing Aud - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews”

• 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 19:59:58 +0800) - Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

• 1996-06-07 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 07:56:48 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 11:28:19 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - nelson@crynwr.com

Re: It tolls for thee

• 1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 14:57:20 +0800) - Re: It tolls for thee - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Wasting time and bandwidth on Bell

• 1996-06-08 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 16:41:12 +0800) - Re: Wasting time and bandwidth on Bell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:

• 1996-06-08 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 06:16:11 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-08 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 07:40:48 +0800) - Re: - Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes@Eng.Auburn.EDU>
  • 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 09:20:02 +0800) - Re: - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 15:31:16 +0800) - Re: - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 18:23:49 +0800) - Re: - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
        • 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 02:15:04 +0800) - Re: - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
          • 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 07:42:16 +0800) - Anonymous computer contractors - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
          • 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:07:32 +0800) - Re: - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
        • 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 13:25:51 +0800) - Politeness, trust and ice cream. - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
          • 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 13:06:59 +0800) - [whoops]Re: Politeness… - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
    • 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:48:47 +0800) - Re: - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      • 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 23:44:00 +0800) - Re: - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
        • 1996-06-12 (Wed, 12 Jun 1996 19:21:49 +0800) - [](/archive/1996/06/aa8dffde9d8cdfd4c76182d0229f2d1e9e476b5286e3be0abececc6e000fd63a) - _snow \<snow@smoke.suba.com\>_
    • 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 14:40:35 +0800) - Re: - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca

Re:

• 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 12:00:44 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 12:16:41 +0800) - Re: - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 15:29:13 +0800) - Re: - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews”

• 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 05:41:40 +0800) - Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Minority vs. majority

• 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 05:51:09 +0800) - Re: Minority vs. majority - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Anonymous computer contractors

• 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 15:11:59 +0800) - Re: Anonymous computer contractors - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

• 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 09:43:52 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net

• 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 17:42:35 +0800) - Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 19:24:21 +0800) - Re: Terrorism Hysteria on the Net - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: USS_hit

• 1996-06-11 (Wed, 12 Jun 1996 07:58:37 +0800) - Re: USS_hit - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Venture capital financing/partnering for unique website ideas/entrepreneurs

• 1996-06-12 (Wed, 12 Jun 1996 17:49:32 +0800) - Re: Venture capital financing/partnering for unique website ideas/entrepreneurs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PBS show

• 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 08:52:31 +0800) - Re: PBS show - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 14:40:10 +0800) - Re: PBS show - Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes@Eng.Auburn.EDU>
  • 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 17:45:59 +0800) - Re: PBS show - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: PBS show

• 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 10:39:37 +0800) - Re: PBS show - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 17:45:25 +0800) - Re: PBS show - Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
  • 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 18:23:17 +0800) - Re: PBS show - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
    • 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 12:01:48 +0800) - Re: PBS show - sclawson@bottles.cs.utah.edu (steve clawson)

Re: PBS show

• 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 15:54:03 +0800) - Re: PBS show - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Neil, the government wouldn’t tap the phones of American Reporters”

• 1996-06-14 (Fri, 14 Jun 1996 19:28:58 +0800) - Re: “Neil, the government wouldn’t tap the phones of American Reporters” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PBS show

• 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 11:22:00 +0800) - Re: PBS show - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PBS show

• 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 11:27:20 +0800) - Re: PBS show - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PBS show

• 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 13:43:54 +0800) - Re: PBS show - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [noise] (was Re: PBS show)

• 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 17:25:25 +0800) - Re: [noise] (was Re: PBS show) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fuseable Links - no guarantees??

• 1996-06-15 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 05:27:43 +0800) - Re: Fuseable Links - no guarantees?? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fuseable Links - no guarantees??

• 1996-06-15 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 06:10:35 +0800) - Re: Fuseable Links - no guarantees?? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: UK users about to get clippered

• 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:21:52 +0800) - Re: UK users about to get clippered - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Termination”?

• 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:41:32 +0800) - Re: “Termination”? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Termination”?

• 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 20:08:41 +0800) - Re: “Termination”? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:31:41 +0800) - Re: “Termination”? - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: Britain to control crypto - official (fwd from Usenet)

• 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 20:34:46 +0800) - Re: Britain to control crypto - official (fwd from Usenet) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Federal key registration agency

• 1996-06-19 (Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:30:38 +0800) - Re: Federal key registration agency - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Digital Cash application

• 1996-06-19 (Wed, 19 Jun 1996 17:55:13 +0800) - Digital Cash application - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 08:55:04 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash application - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)

Re: Digital Cash application

• 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 10:22:48 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash application - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:48:53 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash application - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: German Federal Bank opposes e-cash

• 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 13:31:30 +0800) - Re: German Federal Bank opposes e-cash - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Digital Cash application

• 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 14:15:01 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash application - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: MasterCard Seeks Revision in On-Line Bill

• 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:55:54 +0800) - Re: MasterCard Seeks Revision in On-Line Bill - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Digital Cash application

• 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 18:18:02 +0800) - Re: Digital Cash application - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Current status of RSA patent…

• 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 08:35:23 +0800) - Re: Current status of RSA patent… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 14:53:08 +0800) - Re: Current status of RSA patent… - Intense <exalt@miworld.net>
    • 1996-06-21 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 05:45:47 +0800) - Re: Current status of RSA patent… - “Michael H. Warfield” <mhw@wittsend.com>
  • 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 15:10:12 +0800) - Re: Current status of RSA patent… - edgevamp@juno.com (Gregory A Empey)

Re: Take the money, Harry.

• 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:54:06 +0800) - Re: Take the money, Harry. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [SF Bay Area] Security And Freedom through Encryption Forum

• 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 12:33:09 +0800) - Re: [SF Bay Area] Security And Freedom through Encryption Forum - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Current status of RSA patent…

• 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 21:27:34 +0800) - Re: Current status of RSA patent… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 21:27:58 +0800) - Re: Current status of RSA patent… - Intense <exalt@miworld.net>

Re: Federal Key Registration Agency

• 1996-06-21 (Fri, 21 Jun 1996 23:21:16 +0800) - Re: Federal Key Registration Agency - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-21 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 06:03:47 +0800) - Re: Federal Key Registration Agency - William Knowles <erehwon@c2.org>

Re: NWLibs> Stop Cross-Copying (Re: Take the money, Harry, re.)

• 1996-06-21 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 01:18:40 +0800) - Re: NWLibs> Stop Cross-Copying (Re: Take the money, Harry, re.) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation

• 1996-06-22 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 09:10:34 +0800) - Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-22 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:25:51 +0800) - Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation

• 1996-06-22 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 13:11:14 +0800) - Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-22 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 12:49:40 +0800) - Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation

• 1996-06-22 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 16:22:45 +0800) - Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-22 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 12:02:09 +0800) - Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Federal Key Registration Agency

• 1996-06-22 (Sun, 23 Jun 1996 06:14:21 +0800) - Re: Federal Key Registration Agency - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: L&J: Libertarians

• 1996-06-24 (Mon, 24 Jun 1996 14:04:33 +0800) - Re: L&J: Libertarians - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

One more reason to bash encrypt policy.

• 1996-06-24 (Mon, 24 Jun 1996 17:00:42 +0800) - One more reason to bash encrypt policy. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Zimmermann’s Senate testimony

• 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 12:01:18 +0800) - Re: Zimmermann’s Senate testimony - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages

• 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 12:31:09 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Another free speech victory

• 1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 12:00:59 +0800) - Re: Another free speech victory - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: News: NEC has encrypted networks …

• 1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 16:04:16 +0800) - Re: News: NEC has encrypted networks … - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: rsync and md4

• 1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:42:19 +0800) - Re: rsync and md4 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: rsync and md4

• 1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 12:56:06 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: rsync and md4 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: crypto and bagpipes [NOISE]

• 1996-06-30 (Sun, 30 Jun 1996 09:23:50 +0800) - Re: crypto and bagpipes [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-01 (Mon, 1 Jul 1996 15:47:15 +0800) - Re: crypto and bagpipes [NOISE] - “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
    • 1996-07-01 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 05:46:29 +0800) - Re: crypto and bagpipes [NOISE] - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: fbi botches intel “ecspionage” case

• 1996-06-30 (Sun, 30 Jun 1996 10:31:55 +0800) - Re: fbi botches intel “ecspionage” case - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-06-30 (Sun, 30 Jun 1996 11:23:32 +0800) - Re: fbi botches intel “ecspionage” case - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>

Re: The Net and Terrorism

• 1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 06:09:52 +0800) - Re: The Net and Terrorism - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: LOS_tit

• 1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 06:24:07 +0800) - Re: LOS_tit - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Message pools are in use today!

• 1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 07:03:35 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 10:12:22 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - Eric Davis <ericd@shop.internet.net>
  • 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:18:46 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - “Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>

Re: But what about the poor?

• 1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 07:25:22 +0800) - Re: But what about the poor? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: hard drive encryption

• 1996-07-02 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 07:28:58 +0800) - Re: hard drive encryption - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: But what about the poor?

• 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 12:33:51 +0800) - Re: But what about the poor? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:52:28 +0800) - Re: But what about the poor? - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: Net and Terrorism.

• 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 12:52:48 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Message pools are in use today!

• 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:01:07 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SAFE Forum–some comments

• 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:25:05 +0800) - Re: SAFE Forum–some comments - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: But what about the poor?

• 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:43:02 +0800) - Re: But what about the poor? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SAFE Forum–some comments

• 1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 17:14:21 +0800) - Re: SAFE Forum–some comments - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Net and Terrorism

• 1996-07-03 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 01:53:25 +0800) - Re: The Net and Terrorism - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Net and Terrorism

• 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 09:04:13 +0800) - Re: The Net and Terrorism - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Computer-Aided Revolution

• 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 10:26:23 +0800) - Computer-Aided Revolution - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 12:33:00 +0800) - Re: Computer-Aided Revolution - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
  • 1996-07-04 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 05:25:35 +0800) - Re: Computer-Aided Revolution - CyberEyes <cyberia@cam.org>

Re: ecash thoughts

• 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 15:51:29 +0800) - Re: ecash thoughts - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 11:16:43 +0800) - Re: ecash thoughts - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>

Re: Message pools are in use today!

• 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 17:47:31 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Net and Terrorism

• 1996-07-04 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 06:42:21 +0800) - Re: The Net and Terrorism - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ecash thoughts

• 1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 11:47:16 +0800) - Re: ecash thoughts - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Altair emulator?

• 1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 13:10:56 +0800) - Altair emulator? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ecash thoughts

• 1996-07-05 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 20:41:45 +0800) - Re: ecash thoughts - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Net and Terrorism.

• 1996-07-05 (Sat, 6 Jul 1996 04:47:29 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-06 (Sat, 6 Jul 1996 08:50:48 +0800) - Re: Net and Terrorism. - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Style gettting in the way of clear reporting

• 1996-07-08 (Mon, 8 Jul 1996 16:35:33 +0800) - Re: Style gettting in the way of clear reporting - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: A case for 2560 bit keys

• 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 11:24:30 +0800) - Re: A case for 2560 bit keys - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 15:23:13 +0800) - Re: A case for 2560 bit keys - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>

Re: MSoft crypto API’s

• 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 15:37:38 +0800) - Re: MSoft crypto API’s - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 17:42:18 +0800) - Re: MSoft crypto API’s - Mike Ingle <inglem@adnetsol.com>
  • 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 19:23:34 +0800) - Re: MSoft crypto API’s - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: Contracts, Responsibilities, and Drug-Dispensing

• 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 16:37:29 +0800) - Re: Contracts, Responsibilities, and Drug-Dispensing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: A case for 2560 bit keys

• 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 17:10:38 +0800) - Re: A case for 2560 bit keys - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: MSoft crypto API’s

• 1996-07-10 (Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:49:46 +0800) - Re: MSoft crypto API’s - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: MSoft crypto API’s

• 1996-07-10 (Thu, 11 Jul 1996 05:18:12 +0800) - Re: MSoft crypto API’s - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: MSoft crypto API’s

• 1996-07-10 (Thu, 11 Jul 1996 05:44:12 +0800) - Re: MSoft crypto API’s - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?

• 1996-07-12 (Fri, 12 Jul 1996 11:02:04 +0800) - Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?

• 1996-07-12 (Fri, 12 Jul 1996 14:29:06 +0800) - Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96

• 1996-07-12 (Fri, 12 Jul 1996 19:10:53 +0800) - Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96

• 1996-07-12 (Fri, 12 Jul 1996 22:17:51 +0800) - Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96

• 1996-07-13 (Sat, 13 Jul 1996 12:48:36 +0800) - Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?

• 1996-07-13 (Sun, 14 Jul 1996 01:13:17 +0800) - Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto:

• 1996-07-13 (Sun, 14 Jul 1996 01:23:20 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Can’t block caller ID in Massachusetts?

• 1996-07-14 (Sun, 14 Jul 1996 17:32:42 +0800) - Re: Can’t block caller ID in Massachusetts? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates

• 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 08:57:08 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 09:41:30 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>

Re: Markoff on Clipper III

• 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 10:39:47 +0800) - Re: Markoff on Clipper III - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 16:48:12 +0800) - Re: Markoff on Clipper III - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
    • 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 09:29:54 +0800) - Re: Markoff on Clipper III - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates

• 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 11:30:40 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 12:56:35 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>

Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.

• 1996-07-15 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 07:07:33 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates

• 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 08:54:07 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 15:31:11 +0800) - Sternlight on C’punks - “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
    • 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:53:25 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 20:47:03 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
    • 1996-07-17 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 07:42:51 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
      • 1996-07-17 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:17:57 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:27:29 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
      • 1996-07-17 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 02:49:08 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes@Eng.Auburn.EDU>
      • 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 08:51:28 +0800) - killfile with mh Re: S***** on C’punks - bryce@digicash.com
    • 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 09:17:33 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
    • 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 09:23:20 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
      • 1996-07-20 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 07:34:59 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
  • 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:02:54 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
  • 1996-07-16 (Wed, 17 Jul 1996 01:09:51 +0800) - Re: Sternlight on C’punks - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>

Re: Markoff on Clipper III

• 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 09:16:46 +0800) - Re: Markoff on Clipper III - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Markoff on Clipper III

• 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 13:56:36 +0800) - Re: Markoff on Clipper III - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: #E-CASH: PRODUCT OR SERVICE?

• 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:01:23 +0800) - Re: #E-CASH: PRODUCT OR SERVICE? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: DCSB: Betting on the Future

• 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:50:07 +0800) - Re: DCSB: Betting on the Future - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.

• 1996-07-16 (Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:43:06 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.

• 1996-07-16 (Wed, 17 Jul 1996 03:53:45 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates

• 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 08:34:39 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Symantec’s Your Eyes Only

• 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:24:27 +0800) - Re: Symantec’s Your Eyes Only - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Code used by George Washington made available at last

• 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:11:30 +0800) - Re: Code used by George Washington made available at last - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: An interesting instance of poltical anonymnity, now revealed

• 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 16:23:22 +0800) - Re: An interesting instance of poltical anonymnity, now revealed - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 22:56:39 +0800) - Re: An interesting instance of poltical anonymnity, now - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Opiated file systems

• 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 20:49:30 +0800) - Re: Opiated file systems - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Gorelick testifies before Senate, unveils new executive order

• 1996-07-19 (Fri, 19 Jul 1996 09:52:58 +0800) - Re: Gorelick testifies before Senate, unveils new executive order - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids

• 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 12:22:32 +0800) - Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 13:52:14 +0800) - Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 16:11:54 +0800) - Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids - Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com>
    • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 06:00:40 +0800) - Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
  • 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 16:31:28 +0800) - Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids - Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com>
    • 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 13:03:08 +0800) - Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Bare fibers

• 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 12:25:44 +0800) - Bare fibers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Kellstrom Calls for DT Funding

• 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 13:37:21 +0800) - Re: Kellstrom Calls for DT Funding - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Singapore officials censor U.S. newgroup posting

• 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 14:13:11 +0800) - Re: Singapore officials censor U.S. newgroup posting - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: US versions of Netscape now available

• 1996-07-20 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 04:49:22 +0800) - Re: US versions of Netscape now available - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: lambda 2.09 - French Telco Act Censored?

• 1996-07-20 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 04:54:56 +0800) - Re: lambda 2.09 - French Telco Act Censored? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ABC News on internet telephony

• 1996-07-20 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 04:57:04 +0800) - Re: ABC News on internet telephony - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Netscape

• 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 12:46:49 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:56:29 +0800) - Re: Netscape - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
  • 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 18:33:55 +0800) - Re: Netscape - dan@vplus.com (Dan Weinstein)

RE: ABC news on Internet Telephony

• 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:38:18 +0800) - RE: ABC news on Internet Telephony - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 03:20:44 +0800) - Re: ABC news on Internet Telephony - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>

Re: pledge status

• 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 03:45:54 +0800) - Re: pledge status - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.28 - FBI Director to Testify at Senate Crypto Hearing

• 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 07:42:27 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.28 - FBI Director to Testify at Senate Crypto Hearing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NCs (network computers)

• 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:01:32 +0800) - Re: NCs (network computers) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.28 - FBI Director to Testify at Senate Crypto Hearing

• 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 14:47:24 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.28 - FBI Director to Testify at Senate Crypto Hearing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids

• 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 15:35:49 +0800) - Re: Responding to Pre-dawn Unannounced Ninja Raids - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NSA Lawyers Believe ITARs Would be Overturned if Tested in Court

• 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 18:42:14 +0800) - Re: NSA Lawyers Believe ITARs Would be Overturned if Tested in Court - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Netscape

• 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 10:26:11 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 11:39:05 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>

Re: Borders are transparent

• 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:39:34 +0800) - Re: Borders are transparent - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Intel, Microsoft doing Internet Phone Software

• 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 16:42:25 +0800) - Re: Intel, Microsoft doing Internet Phone Software - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-23 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 03:00:09 +0800) - Re: Intel, Microsoft doing Internet Phone Software - W Lee Nussbaum <wln@evolution.com>

Re: Boobytraps and the American Legal System

• 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 19:52:14 +0800) - Re: Boobytraps and the American Legal System - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Brute Force DES

• 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 20:32:01 +0800) - Re: Brute Force DES - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bare fibers

• 1996-07-23 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 05:53:01 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: DAM_lin

• 1996-07-23 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 06:01:11 +0800) - Re: DAM_lin - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Digital Watermarks for copy protection in recent Billbo

• 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 16:02:05 +0800) - Re: Digital Watermarks for copy protection in recent Billbo - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Digital Watermarks for copy protection in recent Billbo

• 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 17:32:23 +0800) - Re: Digital Watermarks for copy protection in recent Billbo - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:57:07 +0800) - Re: Digital Watermarks for copy protection in recent Billbo - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>

Re: Netscape

• 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 19:42:09 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Intel, Microsoft doing Internet Phone Software

• 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 19:42:57 +0800) - Re: Intel, Microsoft doing Internet Phone Software - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bare fibers

• 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 20:51:25 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-24 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 12:30:29 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
    • 1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 07:02:12 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
    • 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 12:04:50 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - chris.liljenstolpe@SSDS.com (Christopher Liljenstolpe)

Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic)

• 1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 05:16:53 +0800) - Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:49:32 +0800) - Cheap tapes vs expensive CD’s (Way off topic) - Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>

Re: Netscape

• 1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 05:40:57 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 07:19:37 +0800) - Re: Netscape - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
    • 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 12:46:24 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
  • 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:12:18 +0800) - Re: Netscape - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>

Re: Distributed DES crack

• 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 13:03:17 +0800) - Re: Distributed DES crack - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Netscape

• 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 13:31:10 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 20:22:21 +0800) - Re: Netscape - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
    • 1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 01:43:22 +0800) - Re: Netscape - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 05:37:23 +0800) - Re: Netscape - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic)

• 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 14:46:39 +0800) - Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:)

• 1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 05:01:48 +0800) - Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 06:43:26 +0800) - Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic)

• 1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 05:05:38 +0800) - Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Netscape

• 1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 07:58:16 +0800) - Re: Netscape - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:)

• 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:15:33 +0800) - Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CD Prices and Inflation

• 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:17:37 +0800) - Re: CD Prices and Inflation - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 14:43:44 +0800) - Re: CD Prices and Inflation - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1996-07-26 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 03:57:12 +0800) - Re: CD Prices and Inflation - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:)

• 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:30:18 +0800) - Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fireworks expected, missed at Senate crypto hearing

• 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 18:52:37 +0800) - Re: Fireworks expected, missed at Senate crypto hearing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 21:43:34 +0800) - Re: Fireworks expected, missed at Senate crypto hearing - Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz>
  • 1996-07-26 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 03:17:13 +0800) - Re: Fireworks expected, missed at Senate crypto hearing - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Re: Produce 7 Hertz Frequency

• 1996-07-26 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 03:09:26 +0800) - Re: Produce 7 Hertz Frequency - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:)

• 1996-07-26 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:46:59 +0800) - Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Distributed DES crack

• 1996-07-26 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:47:02 +0800) - Re: Distributed DES crack - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Solution?

• 1996-07-27 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 08:00:11 +0800) - Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Solution? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bernstein files for partial summary judgement in crypto case

• 1996-07-27 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 10:43:14 +0800) - Re: Bernstein files for partial summary judgement in crypto case - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-27 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 15:20:25 +0800) - Re: Bernstein files for partial summary judgement in crypto - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1996-07-27 (Sun, 28 Jul 1996 02:07:56 +0800) - Re: Bernstein files for partial summary judgement in crypto - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>

Re: Freeh Testimony 7/25/96

• 1996-07-27 (Sat, 27 Jul 1996 13:22:07 +0800) - Re: Freeh Testimony 7/25/96 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Four Horsemen Go to the Olympics!

• 1996-07-27 (Sun, 28 Jul 1996 01:12:53 +0800) - Re: The Four Horsemen Go to the Olympics! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Olympic bombing

• 1996-07-27 (Sun, 28 Jul 1996 03:15:32 +0800) - Re: Olympic bombing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Twenty Beautiful Women

• 1996-07-28 (Sun, 28 Jul 1996 14:20:31 +0800) - Re: Twenty Beautiful Women - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: your favorite poison recipes

• 1996-07-28 (Mon, 29 Jul 1996 07:20:46 +0800) - Re: your favorite poison recipes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-29 (Mon, 29 Jul 1996 10:18:10 +0800) - Re: your favorite poison recipes - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
  • 1996-07-29 (Mon, 29 Jul 1996 10:41:47 +0800) - Re: your favorite poison recipes - “Christopher J. Shaulis” <cjs@netcom.com>

Re: Feinstein wants controls on Internet, Books

• 1996-07-29 (Mon, 29 Jul 1996 08:09:28 +0800) - Re: Feinstein wants controls on Internet, Books - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-29 (Tue, 30 Jul 1996 01:22:41 +0800) - Re: Feinstein wants controls on Internet, Books - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>

Clinton must like terrorists…

• 1996-07-30 (Tue, 30 Jul 1996 12:13:37 +0800) - Clinton must like terrorists… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-30 (Tue, 30 Jul 1996 13:38:02 +0800) - Re: Clinton must like terrorists… - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Denning vs. Gilmore

• 1996-07-30 (Tue, 30 Jul 1996 14:07:28 +0800) - Re: Denning vs. Gilmore - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-30 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 03:01:43 +0800) - Re: Denning vs. Gilmore - Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>

Re: Taxes in the digicash world

• 1996-07-30 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 03:57:03 +0800) - Re: Taxes in the digicash world - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

You know it’s getting late when…

• 1996-07-30 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 06:21:03 +0800) - You know it’s getting late when… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 10:17:06 +0800) - Re: You know it’s getting late when… - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: Denning vs. Gilmore

• 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 08:44:20 +0800) - Re: Denning vs. Gilmore - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: VISA Travel Money

• 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 08:57:10 +0800) - Re: VISA Travel Money - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 09:28:25 +0800) - Re: VISA Travel Money - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
  • 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 10:04:25 +0800) - Re: VISA Travel Money - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
    • 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 14:02:54 +0800) - Re: VISA Travel Money - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      • 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 15:10:44 +0800) - Re: VISA Travel Money - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)

Re: Let’s Say “No!” to Single, World Versions of Software

• 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 09:10:57 +0800) - Re: Let’s Say “No!” to Single, World Versions of Software - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Dry Under the Waterfall

• 1996-07-31 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:29:31 +0800) - Re: Dry Under the Waterfall - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:FPGAs and Heat (Re: Paranoid Musings)

• 1996-07-31 (Thu, 1 Aug 1996 03:49:27 +0800) - Re:FPGAs and Heat (Re: Paranoid Musings) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “An who shall guard the guardians?”

• 1996-08-01 (Thu, 1 Aug 1996 09:36:49 +0800) - Re: “An who shall guard the guardians?” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Jewell is the Militia Bomber!!!!

• 1996-08-01 (Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:45:43 +0800) - Re: Jewell is the Militia Bomber!!!! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-01 (Thu, 1 Aug 1996 22:07:54 +0800) - Re: Jewell is the Militia Bomber!!!! - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>

Re: “And who shall guard the guardians?”

• 1996-08-01 (Thu, 1 Aug 1996 16:26:41 +0800) - Re: “And who shall guard the guardians?” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: fbi, crypto, and defcon

• 1996-08-01 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 04:39:35 +0800) - Re: fbi, crypto, and defcon - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.29 - Administration, Congress Propose Sweeping Anti-Terrorism Initiatives

• 1996-08-01 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 05:21:13 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.29 - Administration, Congress Propose Sweeping Anti-Terrorism Initiatives - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-01 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 06:42:25 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.29 - Administration, Congress Propose Sweeping Anti-Terrorism Initiatives - “Thomas C. Allard” <m1tca00@FRB.GOV>

Re: Welcome Back

• 1996-08-02 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 09:46:38 +0800) - Re: Welcome Back - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Southern Cracker Beer Bombs in Trucks

• 1996-08-02 (Fri, 2 Aug 1996 19:06:36 +0800) - Re: Southern Cracker Beer Bombs in Trucks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bombs & bomb threats in LA

• 1996-08-02 (Sat, 3 Aug 1996 06:44:16 +0800) - Re: Bombs & bomb threats in LA - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: URGENT: Surveillance Bill Gets New Life - House Vote lLikely TODAY!

• 1996-08-03 (Sat, 3 Aug 1996 10:55:39 +0800) - Re: URGENT: Surveillance Bill Gets New Life - House Vote lLikely TODAY! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Stop the presses – Anti-terrorism bill not that bad

• 1996-08-03 (Sat, 3 Aug 1996 14:35:57 +0800) - Re: Stop the presses – Anti-terrorism bill not that bad - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Freeh slimes again: Digital Telephony costs $2 billion now …

• 1996-08-03 (Sat, 3 Aug 1996 15:55:39 +0800) - Re: Freeh slimes again: Digital Telephony costs $2 billion now … - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Digital Telephony costs $2

• 1996-08-04 (Sun, 4 Aug 1996 09:51:50 +0800) - Digital Telephony costs $2 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Stop the presses – Anti-terrorism bill not that bad

• 1996-08-04 (Mon, 5 Aug 1996 03:12:20 +0800) - Re: Stop the presses – Anti-terrorism bill not that bad - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Freeh slimes again: Digital Telephony costs $2 billion now …

• 1996-08-05 (Tue, 6 Aug 1996 03:08:25 +0800) - Re: Freeh slimes again: Digital Telephony costs $2 billion now … - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bombs & bomb threats in LA

• 1996-08-05 (Tue, 6 Aug 1996 04:27:36 +0800) - Re: Bombs & bomb threats in LA - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: fbi, crypto, and defcon

• 1996-08-06 (Tue, 6 Aug 1996 08:35:29 +0800) - Re: fbi, crypto, and defcon - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Public report of the EU crack.

• 1996-08-06 (Tue, 6 Aug 1996 09:27:53 +0800) - Re: Public report of the EU crack. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: More to be paranoid about…

• 1996-08-06 (Tue, 6 Aug 1996 17:02:03 +0800) - Re: More to be paranoid about… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Digital Telephony costs $2

• 1996-08-06 (Wed, 7 Aug 1996 02:52:49 +0800) - Re: Digital Telephony costs $2 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Internet Economics

• 1996-08-06 (Wed, 7 Aug 1996 05:18:26 +0800) - Re: Internet Economics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Apple people on the list

• 1996-08-07 (Wed, 7 Aug 1996 13:28:01 +0800) - Re: Apple people on the list - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Censorship through proxy

• 1996-08-07 (Wed, 7 Aug 1996 20:55:53 +0800) - Re: Censorship through proxy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Digital Telephony costs $2

• 1996-08-08 (Thu, 8 Aug 1996 08:42:26 +0800) - Re: Digital Telephony costs $2 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Wee Beasties on Mars

• 1996-08-08 (Thu, 8 Aug 1996 09:49:56 +0800) - Re: Wee Beasties on Mars - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: STEGO GUNS

• 1996-08-08 (Thu, 8 Aug 1996 16:37:15 +0800) - Re: STEGO GUNS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight!

• 1996-08-08 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 02:51:11 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Why should we trust the system?

• 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 12:12:49 +0800) - Why should we trust the system? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 17:08:50 +0800) - Re: Why should we trust the system? - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight!

• 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 13:11:54 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: driver license info, loss of liberty, etc.

• 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 14:51:00 +0800) - Re: driver license info, loss of liberty, etc. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Boom!

• 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 15:12:28 +0800) - Re: Boom! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Oregon DMV database: “Needs a good home”

• 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 17:43:23 +0800) - Oregon DMV database: “Needs a good home” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-09 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 02:05:46 +0800) - PRACTICAL USES FOR DMV RECORDS - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>

Re: Why should we trust the system?

• 1996-08-09 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 06:08:32 +0800) - Re: Why should we trust the system? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight!

• 1996-08-09 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 06:37:25 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching

• 1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 09:32:34 +0800) - Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 11:15:08 +0800) - Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  • 1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 17:11:42 +0800) - Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching - Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>
  • 1996-08-11 (Mon, 12 Aug 1996 05:14:24 +0800) - Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
    • 1996-08-14 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:14:43 +0800) - Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching - ”<pstira@escape.com>” <pstira@escape.com>

Re: John Gilmore on the Radio!

• 1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 10:09:12 +0800) - Re: John Gilmore on the Radio! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching

• 1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 11:51:27 +0800) - Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why should we trust the system?

• 1996-08-10 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 13:11:18 +0800) - Re: Why should we trust the system? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Chemistry question please ..

• 1996-08-10 (Sun, 11 Aug 1996 03:29:19 +0800) - Re: Chemistry question please .. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-12 (Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:45:49 +0800) - Re: Chemistry question please .. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Police prepare stunning end for high-speed car chases

• 1996-08-10 (Sun, 11 Aug 1996 05:19:09 +0800) - Re: Police prepare stunning end for high-speed car chases - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: US Power Outages

• 1996-08-12 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 04:43:12 +0800) - Re: US Power Outages - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: US Power Outages

• 1996-08-12 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 05:52:35 +0800) - Re: US Power Outages - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Unmetered Net Usage

• 1996-08-12 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 06:29:07 +0800) - Re: Unmetered Net Usage - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Article on Electronic Commerce with a few too many assumptions

• 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 08:35:17 +0800) - Re: Article on Electronic Commerce with a few too many assumptions - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:32:40 +0800) - Re: Article on Electronic Commerce with a few too many - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Article on Electronic Commerce with a few too many

• 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:02:16 +0800) - Re: Article on Electronic Commerce with a few too many - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Police prepare stunning end for high-speed car chases

• 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:15:51 +0800) - Re: Police prepare stunning end for high-speed car chases - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches

• 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:53:53 +0800) - Re: “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Police prepare stunning end for high-speed car chases

• 1996-08-13 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 05:23:08 +0800) - Re: Police prepare stunning end for high-speed car chases - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-14 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 12:28:03 +0800) - Whoa there, speederpunks! WAS: Police prepair stunning end.. - cjs@netcom.com (cjs)

Re: [NOISE] “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches

• 1996-08-14 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:31:32 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-15 (Thu, 15 Aug 1996 13:07:58 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Political Burnout

• 1996-08-14 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 13:51:50 +0800) - Political Burnout - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: key escrow idea from David Satelin of MIT Lincoln Labs

• 1996-08-14 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:38:35 +0800) - Re: key escrow idea from David Satelin of MIT Lincoln Labs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-14 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:20:00 +0800) - Re: key escrow idea from David Satelin of MIT Lincoln Labs - Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>

Re: Capital and Taxes

• 1996-08-14 (Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:38:59 +0800) - Re: Capital and Taxes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: key escrow idea from David Satelin of MIT Lincoln Labs

• 1996-08-14 (Thu, 15 Aug 1996 03:46:11 +0800) - Re: key escrow idea from David Satelin of MIT Lincoln Labs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-15 (Thu, 15 Aug 1996 08:46:46 +0800) - Re: key escrow idea from David Satelin of MIT Lincoln Labs - “Douglas R. Floyd” <dfloyd@io.com>

Re: Stopped Clock. Was: Schlafly on Crypto

• 1996-08-15 (Thu, 15 Aug 1996 11:04:10 +0800) - Re: Stopped Clock. Was: Schlafly on Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Schlafly helped defeat ERA, supported Goldwater–where do I sign up?

• 1996-08-15 (Fri, 16 Aug 1996 07:22:00 +0800) - Re: Schlafly helped defeat ERA, supported Goldwater–where do I sign up? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FCC_ups

• 1996-08-17 (Sat, 17 Aug 1996 11:48:14 +0800) - Re: FCC_ups - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Triple DES Encryption Now Available For Telephone Privacy Protection

• 1996-08-17 (Sat, 17 Aug 1996 16:20:21 +0800) - Re: Triple DES Encryption Now Available For Telephone Privacy Protection - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Orbiting Datahavens

• 1996-08-18 (Sun, 18 Aug 1996 13:50:45 +0800) - Re: Orbiting Datahavens - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-18 (Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:13:44 +0800) - Re: Orbiting Datahavens - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  • 1996-08-18 (Sun, 18 Aug 1996 18:48:02 +0800) - Re: Orbiting Datahavens - “Douglas R. Floyd” <dfloyd@io.com>

Re: BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven

• 1996-08-18 (Mon, 19 Aug 1996 02:00:11 +0800) - Re: BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-18 (Mon, 19 Aug 1996 05:12:17 +0800) - Re: BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: FCC_ups

• 1996-08-18 (Mon, 19 Aug 1996 03:39:03 +0800) - Re: FCC_ups - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-20 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 06:18:20 +0800) - Phoneco vs X-Phone - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Stopped Clock. Was: Schlafly on Crypto

• 1996-08-19 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 03:42:22 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Stopped Clock. Was: Schlafly on Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone

• 1996-08-20 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 09:44:44 +0800) - Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:48:27 +0800) - Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11

• 1996-08-20 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:11:49 +0800) - Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Pappieren, bitte! (and Taxes, National Debt)

• 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:35:47 +0800) - Re: Pappieren, bitte! (and Taxes, National Debt) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re:phoneco vs X-phone

• 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:49:52 +0800) - Re:phoneco vs X-phone - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone

• 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:53:41 +0800) - Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: phoneco vs x-phones

• 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 15:18:37 +0800) - Re: phoneco vs x-phones - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CIA Contra Crack and LA Gangs (fwd)

• 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 02:54:15 +0800) - Re: CIA Contra Crack and LA Gangs (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks

• 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 05:47:07 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] Airport legal question

• 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 07:57:31 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Airport legal question - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks

• 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 08:57:56 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13:33:28 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
    • 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:12:15 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: telco’s vs x-phones

• 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:03:37 +0800) - Re: telco’s vs x-phones - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks

• 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:02:26 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 18:35:03 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
  • 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 07:31:52 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>

usenet not working with Agent now.

• 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:43:28 +0800) - usenet not working with Agent now. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-22 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:03:19 +0800) - Re: usenet not working with Agent now. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: telco’s vs x-phones

• 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:22:18 +0800) - Re: telco’s vs x-phones - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks

• 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 14:46:26 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks

• 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 05:33:52 +0800) - Re: Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton Sucks - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials”

• 1996-08-27 (Tue, 27 Aug 1996 14:43:43 +0800) - Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-01 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 08:05:13 +0800) - Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials” - patrickbc@juno.com (patrick b cummings)
    • 1996-09-02 (Mon, 2 Sep 1996 09:29:30 +0800) - Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials” - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1996-09-03 (Tue, 3 Sep 1996 12:23:28 +0800) - Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials” - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re:Edited Edupage, 18 Aug 1996 [SATELLITES]

• 1996-08-27 (Wed, 28 Aug 1996 04:23:54 +0800) - Re:Edited Edupage, 18 Aug 1996 [SATELLITES] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-27 (Wed, 28 Aug 1996 07:49:41 +0800) - Re: Edited Edupage, 18 Aug 1996 [SATELLITES] - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials”

• 1996-08-28 (Wed, 28 Aug 1996 15:24:04 +0800) - Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: MUD anyone?

• 1996-08-29 (Thu, 29 Aug 1996 15:39:45 +0800) - Re: MUD anyone? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Simulations

• 1996-08-30 (Fri, 30 Aug 1996 09:37:33 +0800) - Re: Simulations - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Clinton follies ideas?

• 1996-08-30 (Fri, 30 Aug 1996 12:32:53 +0800) - Re: Clinton follies ideas? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Intel to rule the basic crypto engine market?

• 1996-08-30 (Fri, 30 Aug 1996 14:11:56 +0800) - Re: Intel to rule the basic crypto engine market? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-31 (Sat, 31 Aug 1996 11:32:12 +0800) - Re: Intel to rule the basic crypto engine market? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>

Re: “OuR” Project press release (fwd)

• 1996-08-30 (Sat, 31 Aug 1996 06:26:34 +0800) - Re: “OuR” Project press release (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FLT 800: From the Rumor Mill…But It Makes Sense.. (fwd)

• 1996-09-02 (Mon, 2 Sep 1996 14:16:09 +0800) - Re: FLT 800: From the Rumor Mill…But It Makes Sense.. (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

“Bit Tax” article in EET

• 1996-09-03 (Tue, 3 Sep 1996 09:31:01 +0800) - “Bit Tax” article in EET - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: FLT 800: From the Rumor Mill…But It Makes Sense.. (fwd)

• 1996-09-03 (Tue, 3 Sep 1996 12:25:19 +0800) - Re: FLT 800: From the Rumor Mill…But It Makes Sense.. (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Assassination Politics Question

• 1996-09-03 (Tue, 3 Sep 1996 13:06:28 +0800) - Assassination Politics Question - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Los Angeles Times article on Helsingius and anon.penet.fi

• 1996-09-03 (Tue, 3 Sep 1996 16:01:20 +0800) - Re: Los Angeles Times article on Helsingius and anon.penet.fi - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Modem tax again?

• 1996-09-03 (Tue, 3 Sep 1996 17:02:42 +0800) - Re: Modem tax again? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: POT_hot

• 1996-09-03 (Tue, 3 Sep 1996 18:09:22 +0800) - Re: POT_hot - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Esther Dyson Flap

• 1996-09-03 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 05:48:34 +0800) - Re: The Esther Dyson Flap - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 10:59:22 +0800) - Re: The Esther Dyson Flap - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:53:21 +0800) - Re: The Esther Dyson Flap - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
    • 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:03:00 +0800) - Re: The Esther Dyson Flap - Florian Lengyel <flengyel@dorsai.org>

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?

• 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 11:54:31 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 11:45:09 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
  • 1996-09-04 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 06:25:37 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
    • 1996-09-05 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:41:18 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      • 1996-09-06 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 21:45:10 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - ”<pstira@escape.com>” <pstira@escape.com>

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?

• 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:49:14 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?

• 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 16:09:25 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?

• 1996-09-04 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 04:46:19 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-05 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:38:30 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>

Re: Race Bit: C

• 1996-09-05 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 10:03:26 +0800) - Re: Race Bit: C - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Browne and foreign tyrants

• 1996-09-05 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 10:49:00 +0800) - Browne and foreign tyrants - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?

• 1996-09-05 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 16:14:41 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Herr Schmidt

• 1996-09-06 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 19:01:27 +0800) - Re: Herr Schmidt - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Race Bit: C

• 1996-09-06 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 20:52:17 +0800) - Re: Race Bit: C - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-06 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 21:16:07 +0800) - Re: Race Bit: C - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: Anonymous phone calls (was: What is the EFF doing exactly?)

• 1996-09-06 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 03:28:12 +0800) - Re: Anonymous phone calls (was: What is the EFF doing exactly?) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-06 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 05:07:48 +0800) - Re: Anonymous phone calls (was: What is the EFF doing exactly?) - Flying insect killer <kadafi@netcom.com>

Re: Conservation Laws, Money, Engines, and Ontology (fwd)

• 1996-09-06 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 04:05:37 +0800) - Re: Conservation Laws, Money, Engines, and Ontology (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Race Bit: C

• 1996-09-06 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 05:22:41 +0800) - Re: Race Bit: C - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-06 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 06:40:05 +0800) - Re: Race Bit: C - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>

Re: Subject: Re: Race Bit: C

• 1996-09-07 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 08:10:39 +0800) - Re: Subject: Re: Race Bit: C - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Doing away with govt. people

• 1996-09-07 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 09:57:55 +0800) - Re: Doing away with govt. people - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Cellular phone tracing

• 1996-09-07 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 12:08:32 +0800) - Re: Cellular phone tracing - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-07 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 20:39:54 +0800) - Re: Cellular phone tracing - ”<pstira@escape.com>” <pstira@escape.com>

Re: Race Bit: C

• 1996-09-07 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 15:11:50 +0800) - Re: Race Bit: C - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: What the NSA is patenting

• 1996-09-07 (Sun, 8 Sep 1996 03:10:34 +0800) - Re: What the NSA is patenting - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-08 (Sun, 8 Sep 1996 14:50:28 +0800) - Re: What the NSA is patenting - Troy Varange <varange@crl.com>
    • 1996-09-09 (Mon, 9 Sep 1996 08:33:21 +0800) - Re: What the NSA is patenting - “Douglas R. Floyd” <dfloyd@io.com>

Re: MUD anyone?

• 1996-09-07 (Sun, 8 Sep 1996 06:05:05 +0800) - Re: MUD anyone? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [WAS xs4all.nl] Terrorists

• 1996-09-10 (Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:31:17 +0800) - Re: [WAS xs4all.nl] Terrorists - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: China joins Singapore, Germany, ….

• 1996-09-10 (Wed, 11 Sep 1996 07:05:29 +0800) - Re: China joins Singapore, Germany, …. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Guns Don’t Kill People, IP Does

• 1996-09-11 (Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:47:26 +0800) - Re: Guns Don’t Kill People, IP Does - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Crypto Anachy MUD

• 1996-09-11 (Wed, 11 Sep 1996 15:58:44 +0800) - Re: Crypto Anachy MUD - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

ALERT: Call the Commerce committee! 1-800-962-3524

• 1996-09-12 (Thu, 12 Sep 1996 09:12:28 +0800) - ALERT: Call the Commerce committee! 1-800-962-3524 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Hacking Mobil Telephone System ?

• 1996-09-12 (Thu, 12 Sep 1996 13:19:26 +0800) - Re: Hacking Mobil Telephone System ? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (Fnord) Edupage, 10 September 1996

• 1996-09-12 (Thu, 12 Sep 1996 14:59:45 +0800) - Re: (Fnord) Edupage, 10 September 1996 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-16 (Mon, 16 Sep 1996 10:52:51 +0800) - Re: (Fnord) Edupage, 10 September 1996 - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: Fed appellate judge remarks re anonymity, free speech on the net

• 1996-09-13 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 16:54:49 +0800) - Re: Fed appellate judge remarks re anonymity, free speech on the net - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-13 (Sat, 14 Sep 1996 03:02:41 +0800) - Re: Fed appellate judge remarks re anonymity, free speech on the net - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: Jury Nullification = Voting One’s Conscience

• 1996-09-13 (Sat, 14 Sep 1996 04:48:47 +0800) - Re: Jury Nullification = Voting One’s Conscience - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: 260_0it

• 1996-09-13 (Sat, 14 Sep 1996 05:36:49 +0800) - [Re: 2600it](/archive/1996/09/2748a91a69616f2225a87affe1975b755d074fa34d11c59872957e2b7e80657b) - _jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: 56 kbps modems

• 1996-09-16 (Mon, 16 Sep 1996 08:40:43 +0800) - Re: 56 kbps modems - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Living and the Dead

• 1996-09-16 (Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:37:01 +0800) - Re: The Living and the Dead - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-16 (Tue, 17 Sep 1996 05:41:42 +0800) - Re: The Living and the Dead - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

ComLaw> Down South

• 1996-09-16 (Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:02:33 +0800) - ComLaw> Down South - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.

• 1996-09-17 (Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:27:09 +0800) - RE: Workers Paradise. /Political rant. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Living and the Dead

• 1996-09-17 (Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:52:48 +0800) - Re: The Living and the Dead - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.

• 1996-09-17 (Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:55:26 +0800) - RE: Workers Paradise. /Political rant. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet

• 1996-09-17 (Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:19:15 +0800) - Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-17 (Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:18:12 +0800) - Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet - hallam@ai.mit.edu

Re: Free RSA chip

• 1996-09-21 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 03:00:31 +0800) - Re: Free RSA chip - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: IBM_gak

• 1996-09-21 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 03:05:52 +0800) - Re: IBM_gak - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet

• 1996-09-21 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 03:19:31 +0800) - Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-21 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 04:18:56 +0800) - Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
    • 1996-09-21 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 07:28:00 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Kiddie porn on the Internet - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
    • 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 11:10:57 +0800) - Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
    • 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:58:35 +0800) - Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      • 1996-09-26 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 01:47:19 +0800) - Re: Cuba, Iraq, AP… - Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>

Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet

• 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 09:29:37 +0800) - Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Assassination Politics, was Kiddie porn on the Internet

• 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 09:29:40 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics, was Kiddie porn on the Internet - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 13:21:22 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics, was Kiddie porn on the Internet - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 16:10:37 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics, was Kiddie porn on the Internet - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>

Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release

• 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 09:57:40 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 14:11:14 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
  • 1996-09-23 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 16:56:08 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>

Re: The GAK Momentum is Building…

• 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 11:45:18 +0800) - Re: The GAK Momentum is Building… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 13:30:07 +0800) - Re: The GAK Momentum is Building… - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: USA_exe

• 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 14:17:29 +0800) - Re: USA_exe - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release

• 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 15:38:14 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-22 (Sun, 22 Sep 1996 16:35:06 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - Julian Assange <proff@suburbia.net>

Re: Assassination Politics, was Kiddie porn on the Internet

• 1996-09-22 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 03:00:57 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics, was Kiddie porn on the Internet - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: timmy waxes a widdle on AP

• 1996-09-22 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 03:04:30 +0800) - Re: timmy waxes a widdle on AP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Kill ‘em and let God sort it out, was Re: The GAK Momentum is Building…

• 1996-09-22 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 03:25:12 +0800) - Re: Kill ‘em and let God sort it out, was Re: The GAK Momentum is Building… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]

• 1996-09-22 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 03:38:00 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]

• 1996-09-23 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 11:49:20 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 10:39:05 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
    • 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 15:34:50 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 17:06:16 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
        • 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 08:05:04 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - Dan Harmon <harmon@tenet.edu>
        • 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:59:53 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
          • 1996-09-25 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 03:46:06 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
      • 1996-09-24 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 02:59:02 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>

Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release

• 1996-09-23 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 16:53:34 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: USA_exe

• 1996-09-23 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 06:06:33 +0800) - RE: USA_exe - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]

• 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 15:46:29 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 17:35:14 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
    • 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 19:08:35 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
    • 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:06:16 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  • 1996-09-24 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 02:47:13 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: crypto anarchy vs AP

• 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 17:21:13 +0800) - Re: crypto anarchy vs AP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-24 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 07:19:51 +0800) - Re: crypto anarchy vs AP - Clint Barnett <cbarnett@eciad.bc.ca>

Re: AP [NOISE]

• 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 17:34:15 +0800) - Re: AP [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!]

• 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:31:43 +0800) - Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

• 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:53:26 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-25 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 01:36:01 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: SAY WHAT? [Assassination NOISE]

• 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:12:32 +0800) - Re: SAY WHAT? [Assassination NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]

• 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 12:30:55 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 16:04:25 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: Mitsubishi MISTY LSI

• 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:45:25 +0800) - Re: Mitsubishi MISTY LSI - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

• 1996-09-26 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 04:50:05 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

• 1996-09-26 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 07:32:11 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 08:44:33 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

• 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 13:32:54 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-27 (Sat, 28 Sep 1996 04:47:14 +0800) - VCRS and Crypto - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>

Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]

• 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 14:49:06 +0800) - Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: AP Protocol Failures [NOISE]

• 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:01:53 +0800) - Re: AP Protocol Failures [NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Internet plug pulled on Colombia’s guerrillas

• 1996-09-28 (Sat, 28 Sep 1996 09:41:20 +0800) - Re: Internet plug pulled on Colombia’s guerrillas - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: crypto anarchy vs AP

• 1996-09-28 (Sun, 29 Sep 1996 03:53:56 +0800) - Re: crypto anarchy vs AP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-28 (Sun, 29 Sep 1996 06:29:32 +0800) - Re: crypto anarchy vs AP - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 00:33:28 +0800) - Re: crypto anarchy vs AP - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
  • 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 03:20:44 +0800) - Use of Consumer-grade GPS units in Gulf War - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 05:33:17 +0800) - Re: crypto anarchy vs AP - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: Technical difficulties with AP [AP NOISE]

• 1996-09-29 (Sun, 29 Sep 1996 17:15:14 +0800) - Re: Technical difficulties with AP [AP NOISE] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: crypto anarchy vs AP

• 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 03:05:41 +0800) - Re: crypto anarchy vs AP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard)

• 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 05:25:22 +0800) - Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 05:38:14 +0800) - Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard) - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1996-09-30 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 08:53:34 +0800) - Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: GPS and other Dual-use technologies

• 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 05:35:04 +0800) - Re: GPS and other Dual-use technologies - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard)

• 1996-09-30 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 10:40:01 +0800) - Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Internet plug pulled on Colombia’s guerrillas

• 1996-10-01 (Tue, 1 Oct 1996 13:27:42 +0800) - Re: Internet plug pulled on Colombia’s guerrillas - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: active practice in America

• 1996-10-01 (Tue, 1 Oct 1996 13:38:04 +0800) - Re: active practice in America - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-01 (Tue, 1 Oct 1996 15:23:56 +0800) - [PRIVATE] OJ/police pool for AP - attila <attila@primenet.com>

Re: [NEWS] More internet-tax proposals

• 1996-10-01 (Tue, 1 Oct 1996 14:08:30 +0800) - Re: [NEWS] More internet-tax proposals - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Export laws don’t just affect crypto

• 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 11:57:46 +0800) - Re: Export laws don’t just affect crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Can we kill single DES?

• 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 13:54:30 +0800) - Re: Can we kill single DES? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 18:04:59 +0800) - Re: Can we kill single DES? - attila <attila@primenet.com>

Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late

• 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 14:40:47 +0800) - Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:00:34 +0800) - Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:16:41 +0800) - Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 06:22:05 +0800) - WINDOWS NT ???? - Petr Snajdr <snajdr@pvt.net>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 22:39:03 +0800) - Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Re: Clipper III on the table

• 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 15:00:53 +0800) - Re: Clipper III on the table - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: How might new GAK be enforced?

• 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 15:10:28 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 14:39:38 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>

Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late

• 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 19:49:19 +0800) - Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late

• 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:15:50 +0800) - Re: White House crypto proposal – too little, too late - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: NYT on IBM GAK

• 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:43:54 +0800) - Re: NYT on IBM GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: How might new GAK be enforced?

• 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:03:45 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ITAR satellite provision

• 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 12:59:08 +0800) - Re: ITAR satellite provision - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: REM_ail

• 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 14:21:55 +0800) - Re: REM_ail - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 08:59:05 +0800) - Re: REM_ail - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: Can we kill single DES?

• 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 19:11:35 +0800) - Re: Can we kill single DES? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Flood Warning

• 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 05:48:01 +0800) - Re: Flood Warning - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 09:39:20 +0800) - New location for IBM GAK article - Martin Janzen <janzen@idacom.hp.com>

Re: NYT on IBM GAK

• 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 06:00:19 +0800) - Re: NYT on IBM GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision

• 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 06:20:00 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 16:13:15 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 06:56:42 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
      • 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 10:21:30 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - “Klaus E. vonEbel” <unicorn@schloss.li>

RE: The Right to Keep and Bear Crypto

• 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 07:57:44 +0800) - RE: The Right to Keep and Bear Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Right to Keep and Bear Crypto

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 10:30:54 +0800) - Re: The Right to Keep and Bear Crypto - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Clipper spin [was Re:Flood Warning]

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 11:51:21 +0800) - Re: Clipper spin [was Re:Flood Warning] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 12:45:50 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 18:56:35 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - “Klaus E. vonEbel” <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: support for “crack DES”

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 12:58:04 +0800) - Re: support for “crack DES” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 17:42:04 +0800) - Re: support for “crack DES” - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: gack vs. key escrow vs. key recovery

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 13:59:53 +0800) - Re: gack vs. key escrow vs. key recovery - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The New GAK-Clipper Thing will Fail

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 15:41:02 +0800) - Re: The New GAK-Clipper Thing will Fail - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOISE] ITAR Satellite

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 20:11:28 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] ITAR Satellite - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Macintosh – the Surveillance System for the Rest of Us

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 21:33:39 +0800) - Re: “Macintosh – the Surveillance System for the Rest of Us - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting Clipper III

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 08:41:04 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 09:09:05 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 09:44:31 +0800) - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: MacGAK: Tim has a snit. Again.

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 10:08:22 +0800) - Re: MacGAK: Tim has a snit. Again. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 14:32:27 +0800) - Re: MacGAK: Tim has a snit. Again. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 13:07:03 +0800) - Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 13:32:26 +0800) - Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 15:41:53 +0800) - Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>

Re: The New GAK-Clipper Thing will Fail

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 14:57:20 +0800) - Re: The New GAK-Clipper Thing will Fail - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Electromagnetic Pulse

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 17:35:47 +0800) - Re: Electromagnetic Pulse - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-05 (Sun, 6 Oct 1996 02:54:09 +0800) - Re: Electromagnetic Pulse - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1996-10-05 (Sun, 6 Oct 1996 03:45:11 +0800) - Re: Electromagnetic Pulse - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: anonymous oddsman

• 1996-10-06 (Sun, 6 Oct 1996 09:27:53 +0800) - Re: anonymous oddsman - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction

• 1996-10-06 (Sun, 6 Oct 1996 11:35:00 +0800) - Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-06 (Sun, 6 Oct 1996 18:01:42 +0800) - The Great Reducer: Line of the Year - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-10-07 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 04:18:13 +0800) - Re: The Great Reducer: Line of the Year - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?

• 1996-10-06 (Sun, 6 Oct 1996 14:31:37 +0800) - Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-06 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 02:18:03 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
    • 1996-10-06 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 03:54:20 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1996-10-07 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 07:59:23 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
  • 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 18:09:42 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  • 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 20:33:17 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - cypherpunks@count04.mry.scruznet.com

Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?

• 1996-10-06 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 03:24:16 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:26:25 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
  • 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 17:42:17 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  • 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 08:26:49 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: “Drift net fishing,” GAK, FBI, and NSA

• 1996-10-06 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 05:35:05 +0800) - Re: “Drift net fishing,” GAK, FBI, and NSA - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 11:20:02 +0800) - Re: “Drift net fishing,” GAK, FBI, and NSA - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?

• 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 08:34:05 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Another view of anarchy…

• 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:31:39 +0800) - Re: Another view of anarchy… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP?

• 1996-10-07 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 05:36:00 +0800) - Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 08:45:23 +0800) - Re: Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP? - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 11:10:27 +0800) - Re: Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP? - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  • 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 12:08:00 +0800) - Re: Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?

• 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 08:07:54 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: You can be forced to turn over your encryption keys?

• 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 09:41:41 +0800) - Re: You can be forced to turn over your encryption keys? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction

• 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 13:10:13 +0800) - Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 15:50:59 +0800) - Re: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>

Re: Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP?

• 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:29:40 +0800) - Re: Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: yellow journalism and Encryption

• 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 10:35:59 +0800) - Re: yellow journalism and Encryption - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Put up or shut up

• 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 12:06:00 +0800) - Re: Put up or shut up - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 17:46:04 +0800) - Creative Wiretap Arguments [Was :Re: Put up or shut up] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-10-12 (Fri, 11 Oct 1996 21:54:04 -0700 (PDT)) - is there no end to AP & Creative Wiretap Arguments? - attila <attila@primenet.com>
  • 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 10:03:57 -0700 (PDT)) - “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:25:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
      • 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 05:54:52 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
        • 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 13:21:19 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
          • 1996-10-11 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 21:06:54 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
    • 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 15:26:49 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@tc.umn.edu>
      • 1996-10-10 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 21:36:43 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
      • 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 16:24:15 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - Scott McGuire <svmcguir@syr.edu>
    • 1996-10-10 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 19:08:04 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1996-10-11 (Fri, 11 Oct 1996 14:02:30 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers - attila <attila@primenet.com>

Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?

• 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 11:18:12 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Jewell shows warrants are frauds

• 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:05:28 -0700 (PDT)) - Jewell shows warrants are frauds - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Creative Wiretap Arguments [Was :Re: Put up or shut up]

• 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Creative Wiretap Arguments [Was :Re: Put up or shut up] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-10 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 19:07:26 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Creative Wiretap Arguments [Was :Re: Put up or shut up] - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>

Re: Binding cryptography - a fraud!

• 1996-10-10 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 19:13:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Binding cryptography - a fraud! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction

• 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 09:55:53 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-11 (Fri, 11 Oct 1996 06:19:15 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: legality of wiretapping: a “key” distinction - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>

Re: AW: Binding cryptography - a fraud!

• 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 10:48:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: AW: Binding cryptography - a fraud! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why not PGP?

• 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 13:42:41 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Why not PGP? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: LET’S MEET DIMITRI

• 1996-10-11 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 17:59:07 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: LET’S MEET DIMITRI - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why not PGP?

• 1996-10-11 (Fri, 11 Oct 1996 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Why not PGP? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-12 (Sat, 12 Oct 1996 00:53:25 -0700 (PDT)) - exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: AW: Binding cryptography - a fraud-detectible alternative to key-esc

• 1996-10-11 (Fri, 11 Oct 1996 13:52:45 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: AW: Binding cryptography - a fraud-detectible alternative to key-esc - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: RE: Binding cryptography - a fraud-detectible alternative to

• 1996-10-13 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: RE: Binding cryptography - a fraud-detectible alternative to - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-14 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 19:41:58 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: Binding cryptography - a fraud-detectible alternative to - cypher@cyberstation.net
    • 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:55:59 -0700 (PDT)) - [A “RIGHT” to strong crypto? Was: RE: Binding cryptography - a fraud-detectible alternative to - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      • 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 15:56:03 -0700 (PDT)) - crypto wish list (was Re: A “RIGHT” to strong crypto?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1996-10-15 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 19:24:54 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: crypto wish list (was Re: A “RIGHT” to strong crypto?) - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
        • 1996-10-15 (Tue, 15 Oct 1996 11:47:45 -0700 (PDT)) - Stego via TCP/IP (was Re: crypto wish list) - Nelson Minar <nelson@media.mit.edu>
          • 1996-10-16 (Tue, 15 Oct 1996 18:38:36 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stego via TCP/IP (was Re: crypto wish list) - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>

Re: is there no end to AP & Creative Wiretap Arguments?

• 1996-10-13 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: is there no end to AP & Creative Wiretap Arguments? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI]

• 1996-10-13 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 15:15:28 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 01:03:14 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 08:42:10 -0700 (PDT)) - Stick to what you know - attila <attila@primenet.com>
    • 1996-10-15 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 20:45:00 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
      • 1996-10-16 (Tue, 15 Oct 1996 18:21:52 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        • 1996-10-16 (Wed, 16 Oct 1996 05:14:05 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
          • 1996-10-16 (Wed, 16 Oct 1996 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: FLY_not

• 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 09:23:07 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: FLY_not - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI]

• 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 12:03:08 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:13:46 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Blinded Identities [was Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI] - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Fuck Cyberpromo

• 1996-10-15 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 19:09:43 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Fuck Cyberpromo - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-15 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 21:11:41 -0700 (PDT)) - Killing Mr. Wallace of “Savetrees”? - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1996-10-15 (Tue, 15 Oct 1996 05:09:01 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Killing Mr. Wallace of “Savetrees”? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1996-10-15 (Tue, 15 Oct 1996 07:25:41 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Killing Mr. Wallace of “Savetrees”? - “Bruce M.” <bkmarsh@feist.com>
      • 1996-10-16 (Tue, 15 Oct 1996 22:14:55 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Killing Mr. Wallace of “Savetrees”? - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
    • 1996-10-16 (Tue, 15 Oct 1996 18:23:50 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Killing Mr. Wallace of “Savetrees”? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

RE: binding cryptography

• 1996-10-15 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 21:31:39 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: binding cryptography - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Your editorial in the 10/14 PCWeek

• 1996-10-17 (Wed, 16 Oct 1996 20:13:46 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Your editorial in the 10/14 PCWeek - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-17 (Wed, 16 Oct 1996 21:40:22 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Your editorial in the 10/14 PCWeek - Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>
    • 1996-10-17 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 08:53:49 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Your editorial in the 10/14 PCWeek - “Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law” <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
      • 1996-10-18 (Fri, 18 Oct 1996 09:31:50 -0700 (PDT)) - RSA 1024bit Key for Export - peng-chiew low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>

Re: EC patent

• 1996-10-18 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 17:39:45 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: EC patent - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Stopping Crime” Necessarily Means Invasiveness

• 1996-10-18 (Fri, 18 Oct 1996 09:26:58 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: “Stopping Crime” Necessarily Means Invasiveness - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Your editorial in the 10/14 PCWeek

• 1996-10-18 (Fri, 18 Oct 1996 10:32:27 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Your editorial in the 10/14 PCWeek - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: is there no end to AP & Creative Wiretap Arguments?

• 1996-10-19 (Sat, 19 Oct 1996 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: is there no end to AP & Creative Wiretap Arguments? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-19 (Sat, 19 Oct 1996 11:08:43 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: is there no end to Murder Politics & Creative Wiretap Arguments? - hallam@ai.mit.edu
    • 1996-10-20 (Sat, 19 Oct 1996 22:08:30 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: is there no end to Murder Politics & Creative Wiretap Arguments? [RANT] - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: is there no end to Murder Politics & Creative Wiretap Arguments?

• 1996-10-19 (Sat, 19 Oct 1996 14:02:12 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: is there no end to Murder Politics & Creative Wiretap Arguments? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Prof Shamir arrested

• 1996-10-21 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 14:35:20 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Prof Shamir arrested - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Question: OTP

• 1996-10-21 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 15:46:36 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Question: OTP - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Usenet and Re: extortion via digital cash

• 1996-10-22 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Usenet and Re: extortion via digital cash - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Stopping the buying of candidates

• 1996-10-22 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 21:25:43 -0700 (PDT)) - Stopping the buying of candidates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-23 (Tue, 22 Oct 1996 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
  • 1996-10-23 (Tue, 22 Oct 1996 20:38:39 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>

Re: Prof Shamir arrested

• 1996-10-22 (Tue, 22 Oct 1996 10:30:15 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Prof Shamir arrested - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Prof Shamir arrested

• 1996-10-22 (Tue, 22 Oct 1996 12:38:51 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Prof Shamir arrested - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Stopping the buying of candidates

• 1996-10-23 (Tue, 22 Oct 1996 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PIS_son

• 1996-10-23 (Tue, 22 Oct 1996 22:29:58 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: PIS_son - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Stopping the buying of candidates

• 1996-10-24 (Wed, 23 Oct 1996 22:55:13 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Stopping the buying of candidates

• 1996-10-24 (Thu, 24 Oct 1996 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Stopping the buying of candidates

• 1996-10-25 (Thu, 24 Oct 1996 17:10:10 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-10-25 (Thu, 24 Oct 1996 21:20:27 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: Stopping the buying of candidates

• 1996-10-25 (Fri, 25 Oct 1996 13:12:07 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Stopping the buying of candidates - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Any Info for Sen. Pressler….

• 1996-11-05 (Mon, 4 Nov 1996 18:56:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Any Info for Sen. Pressler…. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?

• 1996-11-08 (Thu, 7 Nov 1996 17:16:52 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-08 (Thu, 7 Nov 1996 21:40:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible? - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>

Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power)

• 1996-11-08 (Thu, 7 Nov 1996 17:46:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 03:56:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 10:03:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible? - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: Clinton

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:35:34 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Clinton - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:37:21 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power)

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:51:59 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:52:06 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:52:09 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Judge Patel Background

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 13:37:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Judge Patel Background - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: WebTV a “munition”

• 1996-11-09 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 16:51:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WebTV a “munition” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: “Nightmare on Crypto Street, Part 1”

• 1996-11-09 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 22:49:56 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “Nightmare on Crypto Street, Part 1” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell

• 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 11:58:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-10 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 07:19:40 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: Black Unicorn exposed?

• 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 12:00:05 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Black Unicorn exposed? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell

• 1996-11-11 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 20:54:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Dr. Vulis

• 1996-11-11 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 22:40:14 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dr. Vulis - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-11 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 08:00:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dr. Vulis - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: WIPO Treaty: Worse than CDA- Deadline 22 Nov 96

• 1996-11-11 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 22:55:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WIPO Treaty: Worse than CDA- Deadline 22 Nov 96 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-11 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 23:20:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: WIPO Treaty: Worse than CDA- Deadline 22 Nov 96 - attila@primenet.com

Re: How many people killed by there own governments (Was: Re: a retort + a comment + a question = [RANT])

• 1996-11-12 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 18:55:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: How many people killed by there own governments (Was: Re: a retort + a comment + a question = [RANT]) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?]

• 1996-11-12 (Tue, 12 Nov 1996 10:41:20 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-12 (Tue, 12 Nov 1996 14:41:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?] - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
  • 1996-11-13 (Tue, 12 Nov 1996 18:12:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?] - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?]

• 1996-11-13 (Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:58:28 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-13 (Wed, 13 Nov 1996 04:17:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?] - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell

• 1996-11-14 (Wed, 13 Nov 1996 21:52:55 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-14 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:09:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu

Re: Conspiring to commit voodoo

• 1996-11-15 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:27:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Conspiring to commit voodoo - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-16 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 02:26:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Conspiring to commit voodoo - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-11-16 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 10:14:00 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Conspiring to commit voodoo - attila@primenet.com

Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell

• 1996-11-15 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:40:47 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-15 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:57:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu

Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell

• 1996-11-15 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 21:49:59 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-15 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 22:38:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
    • 1996-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 09:00:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
      • 1996-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 09:14:48 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
        • 1996-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 11:28:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
        • 1996-11-17 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 20:59:54 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
          • 1996-11-17 (Sun, 17 Nov 1996 12:43:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu

Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell

• 1996-11-16 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 19:35:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: A Disservice to Mr. Bell - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Patent Fight Could Add to Cost of Inter

• 1996-11-22 (Thu, 21 Nov 1996 17:31:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Patent Fight Could Add to Cost of Inter - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

market for hardware RNG?

• 1996-11-26 (Mon, 25 Nov 1996 21:04:03 -0800 (PST)) - market for hardware RNG? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-11-26 (Tue, 26 Nov 1996 06:09:34 -0800 (PST)) - Re: market for hardware RNG? - Paul Pomes <ppomes@Qualcomm.com>

Re: market for hardware RNG?

• 1996-11-29 (Thu, 28 Nov 1996 23:07:06 -0800 (PST)) - Re: market for hardware RNG? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: market for hardware RNG?

• 1996-11-29 (Fri, 29 Nov 1996 09:47:04 -0800 (PST)) - Re: market for hardware RNG? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: denial of service and government rights

• 1996-12-01 (Sun, 1 Dec 1996 11:48:18 -0800 (PST)) - Re: denial of service and government rights - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-02 (Sun, 1 Dec 1996 23:27:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: denial of service and government rights - attila@primenet.com

Re: Laptops and TEMPEST

• 1996-12-06 (Thu, 5 Dec 1996 17:31:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Laptops and TEMPEST - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: PGP in Russia

• 1996-12-07 (Fri, 6 Dec 1996 18:32:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGP in Russia - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: KRA_gak

• 1996-12-17 (Mon, 16 Dec 1996 19:40:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: KRA_gak - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ITARs effects

• 1996-12-17 (Mon, 16 Dec 1996 19:41:54 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ITARs effects - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Earl Edwin Pitts, $224,000

• 1996-12-19 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 18:54:23 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Earl Edwin Pitts, $224,000 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-19 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 07:16:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Earl Edwin Pitts, $224,000 - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Credentials without Identity–Race Bits

• 1996-12-22 (Sat, 21 Dec 1996 20:02:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Credentials without Identity–Race Bits - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Executing Encrypted Code

• 1996-12-22 (Sun, 22 Dec 1996 11:10:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Executing Encrypted Code - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Ebonics

• 1996-12-23 (Sun, 22 Dec 1996 16:30:20 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Ebonics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-23 (Sun, 22 Dec 1996 20:20:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Ebonics - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1996-12-23 (Mon, 23 Dec 1996 09:27:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Ebonics - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
      • 1996-12-23 (Mon, 23 Dec 1996 10:26:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Ebonics - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: [NOT NOISE] Microsoft Crypto Service Provider API

• 1996-12-23 (Sun, 22 Dec 1996 19:32:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: [NOT NOISE] Microsoft Crypto Service Provider API - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: [NOT NOISE] Microsoft Crypto Service Provider API

• 1996-12-24 (Mon, 23 Dec 1996 18:27:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: [NOT NOISE] Microsoft Crypto Service Provider API - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Untraceable Payments, Extortion, and Other Bad Things

• 1996-12-24 (Mon, 23 Dec 1996 19:26:28 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Untraceable Payments, Extortion, and Other Bad Things - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-24 (Tue, 24 Dec 1996 12:19:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Untraceable Payments, Extortion, and Other Bad Things - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
    • 1996-12-24 (Tue, 24 Dec 1996 15:37:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Untraceable Payments, Extortion, and Other Bad Things - slothrop@poisson.com (J Durbin)

RE: [NOT NOISE] Microsoft Crypto Service Provider API

• 1996-12-24 (Mon, 23 Dec 1996 22:33:22 -0800 (PST)) - RE: [NOT NOISE] Microsoft Crypto Service Provider API - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?

• 1996-12-25 (Tue, 24 Dec 1996 18:06:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 17:52:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
    • 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 22:07:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
  • 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 19:03:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?

• 1996-12-25 (Tue, 24 Dec 1996 19:29:21 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 21:31:35 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: clipper plans 4 sale

• 1996-12-25 (Tue, 24 Dec 1996 21:28:28 -0800 (PST)) - Re: clipper plans 4 sale - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Reflections on the Bernstein ruling

• 1996-12-25 (Tue, 24 Dec 1996 21:28:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Reflections on the Bernstein ruling - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-25 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 12:02:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Reflections on the Bernstein ruling - Carl Johnson <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?

• 1996-12-25 (Tue, 24 Dec 1996 21:47:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 21:44:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: Reflections on the Bernstein ruling

• 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 21:25:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Reflections on the Bernstein ruling - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-26 (Thu, 26 Dec 1996 03:22:47 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Reflections on the Bernstein ruling - Carl Johnson <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?

• 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 23:00:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?

• 1996-12-26 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 23:01:55 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-26 (Thu, 26 Dec 1996 14:25:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>

Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?

• 1996-12-27 (Thu, 26 Dec 1996 17:30:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RUL_let

• 1996-12-28 (Fri, 27 Dec 1996 17:02:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RUL_let - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: cryptoanarchy

• 1996-12-28 (Fri, 27 Dec 1996 19:26:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: cryptoanarchy - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Access fees idea dropped for ISPs?

• 1996-12-29 (Sun, 29 Dec 1996 03:56:36 -0800 (PST)) - Access fees idea dropped for ISPs? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: (Fwd) Re: Mr. May’s Posts. Other Things.

• 1996-12-31 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 18:29:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: (Fwd) Re: Mr. May’s Posts. Other Things. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-31 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 20:54:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: (Fwd) Re: Mr. May’s Posts. Other Things. - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: “Structuring” of Communications a Felony?

• 1996-12-31 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 22:45:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “Structuring” of Communications a Felony? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-12-31 (Tue, 31 Dec 1996 03:53:04 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “Structuring” of Communications a Felony? - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: Timmy’s Lost It: [Was Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice]

• 1997-01-05 (Sat, 4 Jan 1997 17:10:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Timmy’s Lost It: [Was Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice] - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-05 (Sat, 4 Jan 1997 18:41:18 -0800 (PST)) - I’m not arguing for State-supported monopolies! - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>

Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN…..

• 1997-01-05 (Sat, 4 Jan 1997 22:49:26 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-05 (Sun, 5 Jan 1997 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
    • 1997-01-05 (Sun, 5 Jan 1997 14:30:09 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 00:46:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
  • 1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 01:37:01 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN…..

• 1997-01-05 (Sun, 5 Jan 1997 14:40:06 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 00:46:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: High-tech tracking by police raises legal outcry

• 1997-01-07 (Tue, 7 Jan 1997 00:57:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: High-tech tracking by police raises legal outcry - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Upcoming DES Challenge

• 1997-01-08 (Tue, 7 Jan 1997 23:05:48 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The Upcoming DES Challenge - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Private Idaho source code now available

• 1997-01-12 (Sat, 11 Jan 1997 21:53:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Private Idaho source code now available - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-13 (Mon, 13 Jan 1997 14:14:58 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Private Idaho source code now available - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)

Re: Newt’s phone calls

• 1997-01-15 (Tue, 14 Jan 1997 19:27:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Newt’s phone calls - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Newt’s phone calls

• 1997-01-15 (Tue, 14 Jan 1997 20:28:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Newt’s phone calls - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-16 (Wed, 15 Jan 1997 20:04:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Newt’s phone calls - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try?

• 1997-01-15 (Tue, 14 Jan 1997 20:28:20 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-15 (Tue, 14 Jan 1997 23:38:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try? - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: Debunking rumors – Re: ARKANSAS BANS PHONE SCRAMBLERS

• 1997-01-17 (Thu, 16 Jan 1997 21:14:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Debunking rumors – Re: ARKANSAS BANS PHONE SCRAMBLERS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Interesting item from Nwlibertarians@teleport.com

• 1997-01-21 (Mon, 20 Jan 1997 18:57:42 -0800 (PST)) - Interesting item from Nwlibertarians@teleport.com - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Interesting item from Nwlibertarians@teleport.com

• 1997-01-21 (Mon, 20 Jan 1997 20:25:51 -0800 (PST)) - Interesting item from Nwlibertarians@teleport.com - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try?

• 1997-01-21 (Mon, 20 Jan 1997 22:32:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-21 (Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:20:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try? - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try?

• 1997-01-21 (Tue, 21 Jan 1997 06:57:39 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RSA challenge: is it legal to try? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Scandinavian Goverments provide PGP to postal customers…

• 1997-01-26 (Sat, 25 Jan 1997 22:07:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Scandinavian Goverments provide PGP to postal customers… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Scandinavian Goverments provide PGP to postal customers…

• 1997-01-26 (Sat, 25 Jan 1997 22:55:58 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Scandinavian Goverments provide PGP to postal customers… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Cellular location…

• 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 16:41:59 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cellular location… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:00:49 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 18:00:32 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 18:44:58 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
      • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 19:50:40 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
        • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:07:07 -0800 (PST)) - Assination - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
  • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 18:11:04 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 18:31:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - Nurdane Oksas <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
      • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 19:50:13 -0800 (PST)) - Happy birthday to Oksas - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
        • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:44:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Happy birthday to Oksas - Nurdane Oksas <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
    • 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 19:30:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Cellular location…

• 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:10:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cellular location… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: David Kahn advocates GAK

• 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:52:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: David Kahn advocates GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 18:27:55 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: David Kahn advocates GAK

• 1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 18:28:01 -0800 (PST)) - Re: David Kahn advocates GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

• 1997-01-27 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:17:52 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-28 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 04:34:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - aga <aga@dhp.com>

Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

• 1997-01-27 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:52:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

• 1997-01-27 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:52:34 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-28 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 22:48:00 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-28 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 23:06:58 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-28 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 23:10:54 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

• 1997-01-29 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 19:44:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-29 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 08:20:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - aga <aga@dhp.com>

Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

• 1997-01-29 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 20:11:02 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:33:04 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:28:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:42:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:42:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:58:59 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: RC5-12/32/5 contest solved

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:43:26 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RC5-12/32/5 contest solved - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:56:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:57:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: RC5-12/32/5 contest solved

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 21:11:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: RC5-12/32/5 contest solved - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Sovreign Right of Lawful Access

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 22:55:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sovreign Right of Lawful Access - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Sovreign Right of Lawful Access

• 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 23:10:39 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sovreign Right of Lawful Access - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-30 (Wed, 29 Jan 1997 23:46:52 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sovreign Right of Lawful Access - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 10:38:07 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 10:38:18 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 12:08:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list - aga <aga@dhp.com>
  • 1997-02-01 (Fri, 31 Jan 1997 21:32:06 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 10:39:47 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:13:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:13:48 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:13:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:15:43 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: uae_1.html

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:48:34 -0800 (PST)) - Re: uae_1.html - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 15:57:23 -0800 (PST)) - Re: uae_1.html - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:48:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-01-31 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 16:06:59 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: uae_1.html

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 12:11:35 -0800 (PST)) - Re: uae_1.html - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 12:13:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 12:15:51 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-01 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 10:33:35 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-01 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 10:55:27 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-01 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 10:55:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-01 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 11:41:13 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment

• 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 17:56:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 19:51:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>

Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment

• 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 18:29:37 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel & the 1st Amendment - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Libel, Times v. Sullivan

• 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 19:14:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel, Times v. Sullivan - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 20:34:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel, Times v. Sullivan - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: Libel, Times v. Sullivan

• 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 19:40:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Libel, Times v. Sullivan - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 20:36:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 21:43:40 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater

• 1997-02-02 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 10:48:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater

• 1997-02-02 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 14:25:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 17:14:54 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 17:40:35 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
      • 1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 21:30:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 18:31:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
      • 1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 18:59:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
        • 1997-02-04 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 00:29:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

VOICE STRESS ANALYSIS

• 1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:26:27 -0800 (PST)) - VOICE STRESS ANALYSIS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

VOICE STRESS ANALYSIS

• 1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 22:26:01 -0800 (PST)) - VOICE STRESS ANALYSIS - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater

• 1997-02-03 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 00:38:05 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Free & Open Society & toleration (fwd)

• 1997-02-03 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 00:39:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Free & Open Society & toleration (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Free & Open Society & toleration (fwd)

• 1997-02-03 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 07:11:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Free & Open Society & toleration (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater

• 1997-02-03 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 07:12:46 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Embarrass a Marylander, Go to Jail

• 1997-02-04 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:45:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Embarrass a Marylander, Go to Jail - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: GAK cracking?

• 1997-02-04 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:45:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: GAK cracking? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Embarrass a Marylander, Go to Jail

• 1997-02-04 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 20:11:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Embarrass a Marylander, Go to Jail - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: GAK cracking?

• 1997-02-04 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 20:13:01 -0800 (PST)) - Re: GAK cracking? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Getting into MIT is impossible

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 18:14:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Getting into MIT is impossible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List”

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 19:04:02 -0800 (PST)) - Re: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: More on Cellular Encryption Docs

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 20:58:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on Cellular Encryption Docs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-05 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 02:53:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on Cellular Encryption Docs - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 21:10:50 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List”

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:26:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Getting into MIT is impossible

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:28:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Getting into MIT is impossible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-05 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:37:28 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Getting into MIT is impossible - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: More on Cellular Encryption Docs

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:41:11 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on Cellular Encryption Docs - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:41:22 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: New X-Ray Imager

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:44:26 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New X-Ray Imager - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible

• 1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:44:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-05 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:12:00 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@primenet.com>
    • 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 23:31:47 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: New X-Ray Imager

• 1997-02-05 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 07:26:07 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New X-Ray Imager - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible

• 1997-02-05 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 07:26:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 23:17:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: Getting into MIT is impossible

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:03:51 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Getting into MIT is impossible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:23:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Getting into MIT is impossible

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 19:40:51 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Getting into MIT is impossible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 19:57:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 20:00:32 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 20:00:54 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:25:59 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:41:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ITAR and Paper ROM

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 22:04:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ITAR and Paper ROM - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ITAR and Paper ROM

• 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 22:10:55 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ITAR and Paper ROM - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”)

• 1997-02-07 (Thu, 6 Feb 1997 18:38:11 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”)

• 1997-02-07 (Thu, 6 Feb 1997 19:41:07 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”)

• 1997-02-07 (Thu, 6 Feb 1997 23:42:26 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”)

• 1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 06:56:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Blessing in Disguise? (H.R. 98, the “Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997”) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Enlightened commentary on Netizen.

• 1997-02-08 (Sat, 8 Feb 1997 14:43:02 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Enlightened commentary on Netizen. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ISPs vs Bells - Email FCC

• 1997-02-09 (Sat, 8 Feb 1997 20:47:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ISPs vs Bells - Email FCC - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible

• 1997-02-09 (Sat, 8 Feb 1997 20:47:46 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-09 (Sun, 9 Feb 1997 09:13:42 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

ComLaw> URGENT!! SET UP IN PROGRESS!! (fwd)

• 1997-02-09 (Sun, 9 Feb 1997 15:55:29 -0800 (PST)) - ComLaw> URGENT!! SET UP IN PROGRESS!! (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Enlightened commentary on Netizen.

• 1997-02-11 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:11:37 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Enlightened commentary on Netizen. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible

• 1997-02-11 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:12:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: John’s: In anarchy -everyone responsible - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: ISPs vs Bells - Email FCC

• 1997-02-11 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:12:18 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ISPs vs Bells - Email FCC - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

ComLaw> URGENT!! SET UP IN PROGRESS!! (fwd)

• 1997-02-11 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:27:16 -0800 (PST)) - ComLaw> URGENT!! SET UP IN PROGRESS!! (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

RE: Fighting the cybercensor

• 1997-02-11 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:27:23 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Fighting the cybercensor - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-13 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 21:26:21 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-13 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 22:29:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-13 (Thu, 13 Feb 1997 07:11:01 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - Pete Capelli <pete@ubisg.com>

Re: More on digital postage

• 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 20:40:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 20:40:07 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:08:37 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - “Peter J. Capelli” <pete@idaho.ubisg.com>

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 20:40:59 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 22:38:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 23:25:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      • 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 23:31:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
        • 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 09:24:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  • 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:12:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - “Peter J. Capelli” <pete@idaho.ubisg.com>

Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK

• 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 21:47:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:41:01 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: More on digital postage

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:41:09 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 09:21:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  • 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:21:55 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - “Peter J. Capelli” <pete@idaho.ubisg.com>
  • 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:47:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-02-16 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 18:14:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  • 1997-02-16 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 22:25:23 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - omegam@cmq.com

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:41:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:41:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Letter Re: Kahn Supporting GAK - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: More on digital postage

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:04:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-16 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 18:11:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

Re: More on digital postage

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 11:11:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 15:58:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

Re: More on digital postage

• 1997-02-16 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 18:34:00 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: More on digital postage

• 1997-02-16 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 22:44:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: More on digital postage - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Science Generations, II

• 1997-02-18 (Mon, 17 Feb 1997 18:57:59 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The Science Generations, II - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: The Science Generations, II

• 1997-02-18 (Mon, 17 Feb 1997 20:02:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The Science Generations, II - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics

• 1997-02-19 (Tue, 18 Feb 1997 19:38:51 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics

• 1997-02-19 (Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:26:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-19 (Tue, 18 Feb 1997 23:38:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-19 (Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:38:09 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

• 1997-02-19 (Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:57:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: Dark Times Ahead

• 1997-02-23 (Sun, 23 Feb 1997 14:48:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dark Times Ahead - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

Re: CIA Lie

• 1997-02-24 (Sun, 23 Feb 1997 17:08:00 -0800 (PST)) - Re: CIA Lie - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1997-02-24 (Sun, 23 Feb 1997 17:48:07 -0800 (PST)) - Re: CIA Lie - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>