From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Sandy Sandfort <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 1aeac255535b6e2d4f281b08a75198c6e2081f89d47cabdf21ec2218b2c4d309
Message ID: <199608041735.KAA21449@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-04 19:12:20 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 03:12:20 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 03:12:20 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Stop the presses -- Anti-terrorism bill not that bad
Message-ID: <199608041735.KAA21449@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 08:37 AM 8/4/96 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>
>On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM asked:
>
>> Is there truth to the rumor that poking a file inside the barrel
>> will alter the marks on future test firings?
>I have heard, but have not evidence for, is that with use, these
>characteristic markings change. As a result, putting 200-300
>rounds through a gun at the range is enough to alter its
>identifiable barrel markings sufficiently to defeat forensic
>matching. Don't know, just heard, but it sounds reasonable.
Heard same thing here; it's almost certainly true. It would help if the gun
got a thorough cleaning as well: You can "de-copper" a barrel by plugging
one end, and filling the barrel with an ammonia solution. (this is available
as a commercial product for guns, at wildly-inflated prices. Ordinary
ammonia solution works just as well, cheap.) This dissolves the copper
left from the passage of copper/brass-jacketed bullets. You can tell it's
working: The copper forms the distinctive blue cupramine ion in solution.
BTW, all this changes is the microstructure of the markings: The number of
riflings and the twist of the riflings are, obviously, unchanged.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to August 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-08-04 (Mon, 5 Aug 1996 03:12:20 +0800) - Re: Stop the presses – Anti-terrorism bill not that bad - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>