From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: 44640cecce808ccfd1d48d591981cff629e8f1c4961b515935ccdcee0aa98e81
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961108030919.17279J-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <199611080145.RAA20080@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 08:14:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power)
In-Reply-To: <199611080145.RAA20080@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961108030919.17279J-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, jim bell wrote:
> At 04:43 PM 11/7/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
>
> >
> >I cover RICO because it's a popular prosecution tool,
>
> "popular"? Well, only in a rather stilted point of view!
No, it is popular. It is the most used federal scheme for large scale
prosecutions. It, aside from those critical of government power to the
degree cypherpunks do, a minority by any measure, is much commended for
its flexibility and convication successes.
> > because it is
> >the predominate vehicle for seizure and forfeiture in federal cases
> >(of which remailer and encryption issues are likely to arouse) and
> >because it represents a codification of the approach most courts take
> >when dealing with seizure cases. In a very real way, RICO represents
> >the outer extremes of seizure cases in the United States, and is
> >probably, given the complexity of many state laws, the simplest way
> >to "grab" something. It also has civil provisions which make
> >"private prosecutors" out of you and me.
>
> But the odd thing is, the one entity we can't seem to attack using RICO is
> the Federal government, and probably most other governments levels. Looked
> at purely objectively, it should be easy to demonstrate that the Federal
> government (and its representatives) have engaged in plenty of crime as a
> pattern of activity, and certainly enough to rise to the level of the
> standards of RICO. (It takes only a few instances of such crime satisfy the
> standards of RICO.)
Incorrect. Employees of the Federal Government can be, and have been,
prosecuted under RICO. Many political corruption cases involve some RICO
aspects. This should make Mr. Bell a big fan of the statute, unless he
just likes the flash of murdering officials instead.
--
Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist Switzerland
Return to November 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”