From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Black Unicorn <attila@primenet.com
Message Hash: e598fae95c29c27626e1de4880dc78c8ce1167e79cd729a39e1f2e022b157765
Message ID: <199611080145.RAA20080@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 01:46:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 17:46:31 -0800 (PST)
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 17:46:31 -0800 (PST)
To: Black Unicorn <attila@primenet.com
Subject: Re: RICO - (Was: Group order for Secret Power)
Message-ID: <199611080145.RAA20080@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 04:43 PM 11/7/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
>
>I cover RICO because it's a popular prosecution tool,
"popular"? Well, only in a rather stilted point of view!
> because it is
>the predominate vehicle for seizure and forfeiture in federal cases
>(of which remailer and encryption issues are likely to arouse) and
>because it represents a codification of the approach most courts take
>when dealing with seizure cases. In a very real way, RICO represents
>the outer extremes of seizure cases in the United States, and is
>probably, given the complexity of many state laws, the simplest way
>to "grab" something. It also has civil provisions which make
>"private prosecutors" out of you and me.
But the odd thing is, the one entity we can't seem to attack using RICO is
the Federal government, and probably most other governments levels. Looked
at purely objectively, it should be easy to demonstrate that the Federal
government (and its representatives) have engaged in plenty of crime as a
pattern of activity, and certainly enough to rise to the level of the
standards of RICO. (It takes only a few instances of such crime satisfy the
standards of RICO.)
Change the name "Federal Government" to "Organization X," and describe what
it's done, and all the evidence will point to a clear pattern of crime.
Now, okay, it may seem presumptuous of me to even dream of the possibility
of using RICO against the thugs who wrote it. But this country (USA) is
SUPPOSED to be under the rule of law, not men, and there is no reason (other
than, sadly, pessimism or a-priori realism) to conclude that the government
can't be punished when it breaks its own rules. Such punishment could come
by way of mechanisms such as the OKC bombing, or the far more selective
system Assassination Politics (AP). Take your choice.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to November 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”