1996-10-07 - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?
Header Data
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: 7d91fab278975772a7fe09063f30e501ed3bbd445cdd012e5c1bc7fad0ed12cf
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961007003013.9411B-100000@crl11.crl.com>
Reply To: <199610061727.KAA18789@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-07 09:42:17 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 17:42:17 +0800
Raw message
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 17:42:17 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?
In-Reply-To: <199610061727.KAA18789@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961007003013.9411B-100000@crl11.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Sun, 6 Oct 1996, jim bell wrote:
> One thing I wonder is this: Can the stress indications be removed from a
> voice-containing signal by some sophisticated DSP processing?...
Nope. The PSE, and voice stress analysers in general, measure
stress by the ABSENCE of micro-temors in the voice.
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thread
Return to October 1996
- Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
- Return to “Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>”
- Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
- 1996-10-06 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 03:24:16 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:26:25 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
- 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 17:42:17 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 08:26:49 +0800) - Re: Voice Stress Analysis of Debates? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>