1996-02-17 - Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer…
Header Data
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: sasha1@netcom.com (Alexander Chislenko)
Message Hash: f5d8a80776fe17ff13a466b55a557cf0c74a2e7177db98597defc38641b49b37
Message ID: <m0tncCE-0008xLC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-17 03:35:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 11:35:08 +0800
Raw message
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 11:35:08 +0800
To: sasha1@netcom.com (Alexander Chislenko)
Subject: Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer...
Message-ID: <m0tncCE-0008xLC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 09:20 AM 2/16/96 -0800, Alexander Chislenko wrote:
> I ran my essays through Word grammar checker a while ago,
>and was surprised how stable the grammar statistics were.
>Complexity of the text (grade level) was the same to the decimal point,
>average length of sentences was consistent, etc.
>People also use the same styles of smileys or *highlights*, make
>consistent spelling errors, have their habits of indentation, etc.
What's the next step? Writing a program which "fakes" somebody's style, right?
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
- Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”
Return to “Sean Gabb <cea01sig@gold.ac.uk>”
- 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 11:35:08 +0800) - Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 12:54:56 +0800) - Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer… - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-02-17 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 04:35:09 +0800) - Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer… - Sean Gabb <cea01sig@gold.ac.uk>