From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: f3a1eef60d3e783d6fc2a4173469c4adb44a4a3102cc8f6368e117f223a00397
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960216225636.2782A-100000@gak>
Reply To: <m0tncCE-0008xLC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-17 04:54:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 12:54:56 +0800
From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 12:54:56 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Computer unmasks Anonymous writer...
In-Reply-To: <m0tncCE-0008xLC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960216225636.2782A-100000@gak>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 16 Feb 1996, jim bell wrote:
> At 09:20 AM 2/16/96 -0800, Alexander Chislenko wrote:
> > I ran my essays through Word grammar checker a while ago,
> >and was surprised how stable the grammar statistics were.
> >Complexity of the text (grade level) was the same to the decimal point,
> >average length of sentences was consistent, etc.
> >People also use the same styles of smileys or *highlights*, make
> >consistent spelling errors, have their habits of indentation, etc.
>
> What's the next step? Writing a program which "fakes" somebody's style,
> right?
It's been done already. A program was posted here a while ago that could
actually fake a person's writing style by analyzing word patterns. It does
a pretty good job, too. I can e-mail it to anyone who is interested.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
markm@voicenet.com | finger -l for PGP key 0xf9b22ba5
http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/ | bd24d08e3cbb53472054fa56002258d5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMSVSmbZc+sv5siulAQEbTwQAh8+e51WN10DN6P4aLYoWrmLKLN3NWAJa
TW6hvckc/zq8SnFvsRg9TbwLgVon3uxi+OByYyBR98tLEOSKjNVwv/5XZ5M216Zs
UFk/a4fwWq/eJ2qnYkA9ultP7YQjPovJQCI+r+orJ6uLgoMiw4oLCbggpkpqET+X
lADi5zJncaY=
=+wAT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to February 1996
Return to “Sean Gabb <cea01sig@gold.ac.uk>”