1996-07-26 - Re: Fireworks expected, missed at Senate crypto hearing

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: ac7a957cbc8ae9b3ff0453d64928a32dbea38678e70e0c883b5b9ea33fe8f882
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9607260859.A20884-0100000@well>
Reply To: <199607260744.AAA23283@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 19:17:13 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 03:17:13 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 03:17:13 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Fireworks expected, missed at Senate crypto hearing
In-Reply-To: <199607260744.AAA23283@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9607260859.A20884-0100000@well>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, jim bell wrote:

> >Just more of the same, though we heard less about child pornographers and
> >more about terrorists. And Sen. Slate Gorton (R-Wash) jumped on the
> >committee staff for leaning too far *away* from national security interests
> >in their summary of the legislation.
> 
> What does that mean?  As opposed to what?  (Gorton's my Senator, and I'm 
> going to give a little feedback to his local office...)

He criticized the committee staff for not preparing a balanced summary. 
Harsh words, from a Repub.

If his comments yesterday are indicia, he won't vote for Pro-CODE. 

-Declan






Thread