From: “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
To: jimbell@pacifier.com (jim bell)
Message Hash: 6b3832d1e0620eddac717d88810f7716fe78fd6b0aab0a87f7c8547fc3886b6c
Message ID: <199601031508.JAA05085@dal1820.computek.net>
Reply To: <m0tXMnW-0008z2C@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-04 07:19:59 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 15:19:59 +0800
From: "Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]" <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 15:19:59 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com (jim bell)
Subject: Re: Guerilla Internet Service Providers (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <m0tXMnW-0008z2C@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <199601031508.JAA05085@dal1820.computek.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> As a ham, too (N7IJS) I recognize your implicit selection of 2m or 450 MHz.
> But I gently object to this, for reasons that I think will be obvious.
I was thinking of the itenerant frequencies around 151 MHz, but the
bandwidth would be limited. I wasn't thinking of amateur frequencies,
but my fingers sometimes have a mind of their own ;)
> First, technology has been marching on in the last 10-20 years, and
> communications frequencies of 2 GHz and more are technically do-able and
> comparatively empty. (and with modern IC technology, even easy)
I'd love to see plans (or used commercial gear) able to do this - I've
got a point-to-point application that I'd love to set up ...
> Secondly, ham gear tends to be used for long-range communication (miles and
> watts) and generally has little or no ability to frequency hop/time hop or
> to automatically turn down transmitter power to be able to share frequencies
> over short distances (low milliwatts or even microwatts). Those high
> gigahertz frequencies would be ideal for communication over a few blocks
> distance. (Sure, packet has been done for years but it is a still-born
> development; they still think 9600 bps is a "fast" modem speed.)
The opportunities for this sort of thing are amazing. And remember,
there are two types of spread spectrum - the high bandwidth stuff as well
as the frequency hopping stuff.
> I forsee locally-owned boxes that are the equivalent of a wireless phone
> switch implementing re-used freuqency microcells; the cost SHOULD be far
> lower than the current copperline phone systems, once the telephones are
> paid for. And they shouldn't cost much more than current 900 MHz cordless
> telephones, too.
Again, I'd like to see this, too...
- --
Ed Carp, N7EKG Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com
214/993-3935 voicemail/digital pager
800/558-3408 SkyPager
Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key an88744@anon.penet.fi
"Past the wounds of childhood, past the fallen dreams and the broken families,
through the hurt and the loss and the agony only the night ever hears, is a
waiting soul. Patient, permanent, abundant, it opens its infinite heart and
asks only one thing of you ... 'Remember who it is you really are.'"
-- "Losing Your Mind", Karen Alexander and Rick Boyes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMOqb1CS9AwzY9LDxAQGDQQP5AaMaKy6t4q6Xfog19JFAnuqxULH6r6UV
03I2sA+h1/vyM9fAuyUEwlBlKUrA3+tByM3VCn5Q2HH4twxwRRLRSn9peJG7fpnE
pc36wVwqwXHvKslrSFA10Y5lahEzuS7NC+jTYgw6l+VF17yJaPw+dtXlpcsq+SMo
bj3VDH6nVDQ=
=vamo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”