From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5a20141aeae5fe6366238edde4f95d42c00c81bf99c614ea8306c75d8237b3e8
Message ID: <199607040656.XAA09167@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-04 09:47:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 17:47:31 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 17:47:31 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Message pools _are_ in use today!
Message-ID: <199607040656.XAA09167@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 05:25 PM 7/3/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>Someone mentioned the Ku-band dishes that are used by PageSat (or whatever
>it is now called....). My DSS system, which is technically a Ku-band
>receiver, has a digital i/o connector of some sort on the back, and it is
>rumored that this will someday be available for PageSat-like uses. (I have
>a feeling this may be years off, for admin reasons if not technical
>reasons.)
As I understand it, the DSS broadcast (unlike older C-band units) consists
of a single digital stream which contains the highly compressed (MPEG?) data
representing all channels. Being compressed, the data rate needed per
channel varies with the scene and the rate it changes. Even if you add up
a large number of these statistically-varying channels, you'll still get a
fairly wide variation in the needed bit rate per second. The system must
have a substantial amount of headroom to protect against occasional times
when many channels need a lot of bits, headroom that is mostly not being
used, most of the time. If this is correct, then most of this headroom
should be available to piggybacked data traffic on a "space-available"
basis. Probably tens of megabits per second.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to July 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 17:47:31 +0800) - Re: Message pools are in use today! - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>