1996-06-21 - Re: Take the money, Harry.

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: nwlibertarians@teleport.com
Message Hash: ec1d824cf4b6643dec9e4d023a1601b1040930380637a7272577ca1c815009b4
Message ID: <199606202051.NAA03879@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-21 02:54:06 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:54:06 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:54:06 +0800
To: nwlibertarians@teleport.com
Subject: Re: Take the money, Harry.
Message-ID: <199606202051.NAA03879@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 01:25 AM 6/20/96 -0800, Tonie Nathan wrote:
>>  Jim, 
>Harry should take the money.  As Ayn Rand said, "Don't let your morality be
>used against you."
>
>   I believe in the philosophy of law.  As long as it's legal, each person
>can take whatever he is legally entitled to from the government's stolen
>money, as long as he/she doesn't ADVOCATE that the coercive tax system be
>retained.   Many will not take grants, or welfare, but they are legally
>entitled to it.  As for the moral entitlement, that is a matter for them to
>work out for themselves. After all, we have to drive on government (tax
>supported) roads, etc.
>
>Tonie

[for the record, Tonie Nathan was the 1976 (?) Libertarian Vice Presidential 
Candidate.  Right, Tonie?]

I think the issue is fairly clear-cut, from a libertarian standpoint, _IF_ 
the money is accepted simply to be returned to the people it was stolen 
from.  That reduces the size of the net theft, produces publicity, and wakes 
the public up.

Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread