1996-04-14 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: 0740d5384db4caa2be39169f8f27b8ba92390e1c6b6760f20e34ab0a6bb4c9e5
Message ID: <m0u8Hnr-0008xYC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-14 05:45:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:45:06 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:45:06 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <m0u8Hnr-0008xYC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 09:25 PM 4/9/96 -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:
>At  6:27 PM 4/9/96 -0800, jim bell wrote:
>>At 07:08 PM 4/9/96 -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:
>>>At  3:21 PM 4/9/96 -0800, jim bell wrote:
>>>>And the rest of us are tired of seeing those non-responses!
>>>
>>>I wish to state that Jim Bell does not speak for me.
>>
>>Tell me, what is the most exciting, interesting, and imaginative usage of 
>>"Yadda Yadda Yadda" that _you_ remember, Bill?
>
>This will be my last post on this subject.  Since Jim Bell ALWAYS has to
>have the last word on any given subject, he will continue to try to read
>something into my statement that is not there.  I can not get much clearer
>than:
>
>I have not authorized Jim Bell to speak for me.
>

I seem to recall seeing this message about 4 days ago, when it was 
originally posted.  Somehow it is not me who seems to need to "have the last 
word."  Apparently, not only do you need to have the last word, you need to 
have it TWICE.






Thread